O39 Second-line treatment in recurrent primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation: an international multicentre study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and Aims One in three people who undergo liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) develop disease recurrence. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) given prophylactically post-LT has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent PBC (rPBC); and when administered as first-line treatment, slows liver disease progression. The aim of this international, multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of currently available second-line treatments (SLTs) in the context of rPBC. Method We collected demographic, clinical and laboratory data from patients (pts) with PBC who underwent liver transplantation from 1999 to 2023, across six centres in Europe and North America. Eligible pts had biopsy proven disease recurrence, in the absence of biochemical dysfunction attributable to post-LT biliary strictures, hepatic arterial complications or allograft rejection, and who were treated with SLTs (obeticholic acid [OCA] or fibric acid derivatives [FA derivatives]). Biochemical trends, alongside discontinuation rates and tolerability data was accrued over a 12-month period from the point of starting second-line therapy. Results Over the course of the study, 21 individuals with rPBC were treated with SLT (10 OCA, 11 FA derivatives). In all, 15 study pts were women, with a median age of PBC diagnosis and at time of LT of 41y (IQR 35–49) and 46y (IQR 39–51), respectively. All pts were offered UDCA post-LT; however, nine were deemed UDCA-intolerant and discontinued therapy prior to starting SLT. The median time from transplantation to rPBC was 1035 days (IQR 684–1531 days; earliest diagnosis being made 183 days post-LT). The median transient elastography score at time of PBC recurrence was 8.80 (IQR 6.30–12.2) kPa. In total, 16, 14 and 14 pts completed 3, 6 and 12 months of follow up on SLT. Five pts discontinued OCA due to concerns over liver disease progression (n=3), drug intolerance (n=1) or pruritus (n=1). Four pts discontinued FA derivatives due to renal dysfunction (n=2) or concerns over liver disease progression (n=2). Three pts were referred for re-transplantation and 5 patients died (4 liver-related deaths). At 3, 6 and 12 months of OCA treatment, median percentage reduction in serum ALT from baseline were 8.3% (4.6%-11.5%; p=0.08), 42.4% (31.6%-51.3%; p=0.02), 30.3% (21.4%-45.4%; p=0.40) whereas median reduction in serum ALP were 17.8% (11.5%-24.6%; p=0.38), 30% (19%-39.4%; p=0.22) and 3.9% (1.4%-6.7%; p=0.40) at 12 months. In turn, median ALT reduction in the FA derivative group at 3, 6 and 12 months were 8%(4.1%-11.7%; p= 0.1), 16.2% (7.6%-25.6%; p=-0.19) and 8.1% (3.9%-17.4%; p=0.65) and for ALP were 25% (11.4–37.3%; p=0.03), 34.84% (25.6%-49.1%; p=0.01) and 34.8% (27.6%-45.4%; p=0.05), respectively. Conclusions This is the first, real world study assessing SLT in rPBC. Both OCA and FA derivatives appear safe after LT in rPBC and resulted in reduction in biochemical parameters with similar discontinuation rates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».