O39 Second-line treatment in recurrent primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation: an international multicentre study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims One in three people who undergo liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) develop disease recurrence. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) given prophylactically post-LT has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent PBC (rPBC); and when administered as first-line treatment, slows liver disease progression. The aim of this international, multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of currently available second-line treatments (SLTs) in the context of rPBC. Method We collected demographic, clinical and laboratory data from patients (pts) with PBC who underwent liver transplantation from 1999 to 2023, across six centres in Europe and North America. Eligible pts had biopsy proven disease recurrence, in the absence of biochemical dysfunction attributable to post-LT biliary strictures, hepatic arterial complications or allograft rejection, and who were treated with SLTs (obeticholic acid [OCA] or fibric acid derivatives [FA derivatives]). Biochemical trends, alongside discontinuation rates and tolerability data was accrued over a 12-month period from the point of starting second-line therapy. Results Over the course of the study, 21 individuals with rPBC were treated with SLT (10 OCA, 11 FA derivatives). In all, 15 study pts were women, with a median age of PBC diagnosis and at time of LT of 41y (IQR 35–49) and 46y (IQR 39–51), respectively. All pts were offered UDCA post-LT; however, nine were deemed UDCA-intolerant and discontinued therapy prior to starting SLT. The median time from transplantation to rPBC was 1035 days (IQR 684–1531 days; earliest diagnosis being made 183 days post-LT). The median transient elastography score at time of PBC recurrence was 8.80 (IQR 6.30–12.2) kPa. In total, 16, 14 and 14 pts completed 3, 6 and 12 months of follow up on SLT. Five pts discontinued OCA due to concerns over liver disease progression (n=3), drug intolerance (n=1) or pruritus (n=1). Four pts discontinued FA derivatives due to renal dysfunction (n=2) or concerns over liver disease progression (n=2). Three pts were referred for re-transplantation and 5 patients died (4 liver-related deaths). At 3, 6 and 12 months of OCA treatment, median percentage reduction in serum ALT from baseline were 8.3% (4.6%-11.5%; p=0.08), 42.4% (31.6%-51.3%; p=0.02), 30.3% (21.4%-45.4%; p=0.40) whereas median reduction in serum ALP were 17.8% (11.5%-24.6%; p=0.38), 30% (19%-39.4%; p=0.22) and 3.9% (1.4%-6.7%; p=0.40) at 12 months. In turn, median ALT reduction in the FA derivative group at 3, 6 and 12 months were 8%(4.1%-11.7%; p= 0.1), 16.2% (7.6%-25.6%; p=-0.19) and 8.1% (3.9%-17.4%; p=0.65) and for ALP were 25% (11.4–37.3%; p=0.03), 34.84% (25.6%-49.1%; p=0.01) and 34.8% (27.6%-45.4%; p=0.05), respectively. Conclusions This is the first, real world study assessing SLT in rPBC. Both OCA and FA derivatives appear safe after LT in rPBC and resulted in reduction in biochemical parameters with similar discontinuation rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".