MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400237119 · doi:10.4103/ija.ija_519_24

Ketamine sedation in critically ill patients: Past, present and future

2024· editorial· en· W4400237119 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Sameer Sharif, Jay Prakash, Bram Rochwerg

Notice bibliographique

RevueIndian Journal of Anaesthesia · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityImpact
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineKetamineSedationAnesthesiaPropofolDissociativePhencyclidineIntensive care unitDeliriumOpioidAnalgesicFentanylGeneral anaesthesiaNMDA receptorIntensive care medicinePharmacologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When it comes to sedation modalities for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), the available options have not immensely increased over the past 60–70 years.[1] The first drugs used to sedate critically ill patients came from anaesthesia and included agents used for both general anaesthesia and short-term sedation during regional anaesthesia.[2] The Food and Drug Administration approved ketamine, a derivative of phencyclidine, in 1970 after it was first identified in 1965. Still, adverse effects, including an intense and prolonged emergence delirium, limited its use.[3] Ketamine has historically been referred to as a ‘dissociative anaesthetic’, a term that describes how distinct brain regions are ‘dissociated’ from one another when simultaneously activated (such as the hippocampus and frontal cortex) or suppressed (such as the thalamus).[4] Ketamine functions as an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, an advantageous mechanism compared to other agents, providing analgesia and anaesthesia.[5] In addition, it has sympathomimetic properties thought to be secondary to a reduction in catecholamine reuptake and interacts with the mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors.[5] Fast forward to the present, ketamine is used to induce anaesthesia in operating rooms, as an analgesic agent in perioperative and postoperative patients, as well as in patients experiencing chronic pain.[6] Ketamine maintains relatively stable haemodynamics and has less impact on respiratory drive than other induction agents. Hence, it is frequently used in critically ill patients to ease endotracheal intubation.[7] In the emergency department and ICU setting, ketamine has been used for severe agitation (intramuscular dosing at 5 mg/kg),[8] delayed sequence intubation[9] and periprocedural sedation.[10,11] Ketamine is also sometimes used in the ICU as a continuous infusion in the management of refractory status epilepticus[12] and severe bronchospasm.[13] While transient bolus dosing of ketamine in the emergency department and operating room is well established and supported by the literature, there is not much data examining its use as a continuous sedative in the ICU.[14] The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was a tipping point for many ICU clinicians, providing an impetus to broaden their selection of continuous sedatives owing to the high sedation needs of these patients and the international drug shortages that forced the consideration of non-traditional sedation agents, including ketamine.[15] A prior survey of intensivists in Canada found that while ICU clinicians may consider ketamine infusions for severe asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome and refractory pain, its use is not widespread and concerns about increased delirium limit it.[16] Surveys in other countries, including Germany and the USA, have not only demonstrated consistent findings but also indicated that there is increased interest in the use of ketamine for wider ICU-based indications.[16-18] Another potential explanation for this increase in ketamine interest in the ICU setting may be the increasing number of emergency physicians and anaesthesiologists training in critical care, a group of physicians with a reputation for being more comfortable with this drug and its use in the acute setting.[19] While sparse, data examining the efficacy and safety of using ketamine in the ICU is increasing. A recent scoping review examining continuous ketamine infusion for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in the ICU found nine eligible prospective randomised studies.[20] These randomised studies were all small, with sample sizes ranging from 25 to 160 patients, ketamine infusion doses ranging from 0.06 to 4.9 mg/kg/h and duration of infusion ranging from 9 h to 8 days.[20] Of these nine studies, only two were blinded, leading the authors to conclude that currently there exists a lack of high-quality, well-designed studies investigating the use of a continuous ketamine infusion in the ICU. These conclusions were echoed in two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine use in critically ill patients.[20,21] Interestingly, one also found that ketamine may decrease the need for other sedatives[22] and the other found that it may decrease delirium.[21] That being said, based on the existing low-quality data that we do have, ketamine appears to be safe and well-tolerated in critically ill patients.[20-22] Given this renewed interest in ketamine, future studies need to focus on its use as a continuous infusion in critically ill patients. Specifically, significant uncertainty regarding the frequency and seriousness of ketamine emergence reactions and their impact on long-term outcomes persists. How will ketamine use impact delirium? On one hand, an increase in emergence reactions may increase delirium, while on the other, evidence shows that ketamine use may reduce delirium.[21,22] Given the increasing frailty of the ICU population and their proclivity for developing delirium, this remains a significant concern that must be addressed before ketamine is used more widely. Given the sympathomimetic effects of the drug, there is also uncertainty in how it may affect haemodynamics or potentially impact vasopressor use or frequency of arrhythmias in critically ill patients. To address some of these concerns, randomised controlled trials are needed to explore the use of ketamine as an adjunctive infusion in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. We expect that in the near future, we will have insight into the efficacy and safety of ketamine as a continuous sedative, which will inform its application in critically ill patients in the years to come.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,429
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIndian Journal of AnaesthesiaMême sujetAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsTravaux en français237 207