Ketamine sedation in critically ill patients: Past, present and future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When it comes to sedation modalities for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), the available options have not immensely increased over the past 60–70 years.[1] The first drugs used to sedate critically ill patients came from anaesthesia and included agents used for both general anaesthesia and short-term sedation during regional anaesthesia.[2] The Food and Drug Administration approved ketamine, a derivative of phencyclidine, in 1970 after it was first identified in 1965. Still, adverse effects, including an intense and prolonged emergence delirium, limited its use.[3] Ketamine has historically been referred to as a ‘dissociative anaesthetic’, a term that describes how distinct brain regions are ‘dissociated’ from one another when simultaneously activated (such as the hippocampus and frontal cortex) or suppressed (such as the thalamus).[4] Ketamine functions as an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, an advantageous mechanism compared to other agents, providing analgesia and anaesthesia.[5] In addition, it has sympathomimetic properties thought to be secondary to a reduction in catecholamine reuptake and interacts with the mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors.[5] Fast forward to the present, ketamine is used to induce anaesthesia in operating rooms, as an analgesic agent in perioperative and postoperative patients, as well as in patients experiencing chronic pain.[6] Ketamine maintains relatively stable haemodynamics and has less impact on respiratory drive than other induction agents. Hence, it is frequently used in critically ill patients to ease endotracheal intubation.[7] In the emergency department and ICU setting, ketamine has been used for severe agitation (intramuscular dosing at 5 mg/kg),[8] delayed sequence intubation[9] and periprocedural sedation.[10,11] Ketamine is also sometimes used in the ICU as a continuous infusion in the management of refractory status epilepticus[12] and severe bronchospasm.[13] While transient bolus dosing of ketamine in the emergency department and operating room is well established and supported by the literature, there is not much data examining its use as a continuous sedative in the ICU.[14] The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was a tipping point for many ICU clinicians, providing an impetus to broaden their selection of continuous sedatives owing to the high sedation needs of these patients and the international drug shortages that forced the consideration of non-traditional sedation agents, including ketamine.[15] A prior survey of intensivists in Canada found that while ICU clinicians may consider ketamine infusions for severe asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome and refractory pain, its use is not widespread and concerns about increased delirium limit it.[16] Surveys in other countries, including Germany and the USA, have not only demonstrated consistent findings but also indicated that there is increased interest in the use of ketamine for wider ICU-based indications.[16-18] Another potential explanation for this increase in ketamine interest in the ICU setting may be the increasing number of emergency physicians and anaesthesiologists training in critical care, a group of physicians with a reputation for being more comfortable with this drug and its use in the acute setting.[19] While sparse, data examining the efficacy and safety of using ketamine in the ICU is increasing. A recent scoping review examining continuous ketamine infusion for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in the ICU found nine eligible prospective randomised studies.[20] These randomised studies were all small, with sample sizes ranging from 25 to 160 patients, ketamine infusion doses ranging from 0.06 to 4.9 mg/kg/h and duration of infusion ranging from 9 h to 8 days.[20] Of these nine studies, only two were blinded, leading the authors to conclude that currently there exists a lack of high-quality, well-designed studies investigating the use of a continuous ketamine infusion in the ICU. These conclusions were echoed in two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine use in critically ill patients.[20,21] Interestingly, one also found that ketamine may decrease the need for other sedatives[22] and the other found that it may decrease delirium.[21] That being said, based on the existing low-quality data that we do have, ketamine appears to be safe and well-tolerated in critically ill patients.[20-22] Given this renewed interest in ketamine, future studies need to focus on its use as a continuous infusion in critically ill patients. Specifically, significant uncertainty regarding the frequency and seriousness of ketamine emergence reactions and their impact on long-term outcomes persists. How will ketamine use impact delirium? On one hand, an increase in emergence reactions may increase delirium, while on the other, evidence shows that ketamine use may reduce delirium.[21,22] Given the increasing frailty of the ICU population and their proclivity for developing delirium, this remains a significant concern that must be addressed before ketamine is used more widely. Given the sympathomimetic effects of the drug, there is also uncertainty in how it may affect haemodynamics or potentially impact vasopressor use or frequency of arrhythmias in critically ill patients. To address some of these concerns, randomised controlled trials are needed to explore the use of ketamine as an adjunctive infusion in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. We expect that in the near future, we will have insight into the efficacy and safety of ketamine as a continuous sedative, which will inform its application in critically ill patients in the years to come.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".