MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400296520 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae108.656

P-289 Optimising the detection of obliterated Pouch of Douglas for endometriosis diagnosis, by combining unpaired endometriosis ultrasounds and magnetic resonance imaging using Artificial Intelligence

2024· article· en· W4400296520 sur OpenAlexaff
Jodie Avery, Hu Wang, Mathew Leonardi, Steven Knox, Alison Deslandes, Minh‐Son To, Gustavo Carneiro, G. Condous, M. Louise Hull

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEndometriosisMagnetic resonance imagingPouchMedicineRadiologyGynecologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Can we improve the diagnostic accuracy of the detection of POD obliteration in endometriosis magnetic resonance imaging, by leveraging results from unpaired eTVUS data sets? Summary answer We illustrate effective multimodal analysis methods improve POD obliteration detection accuracy from eMRI datasets, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 65.0% to 90.6%. What is known already Traditionally, women investigated for pelvic pain and endometriosis, wait 6.4 years for laparoscopic diagnosis. There is a need for a more timely, non-invasive, accessible diagnostic tool. IMAGENDO is designed to combine eTVUS and eMRI using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to address this delay. We have previously demonstrated detection of pelvic endometriosis, including Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration, has a 95% specificity from endometriosis ultrasounds (eTVUS) and 72% from endometriosis magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI). This preliminary data has shown our novel multimodal AI approach, using imaging data from eTVUS and eMRIs, can improve diagnostic accuracy when detecting POD obliteration in endometriosis. Study design, size, duration The IMAGENDO study is a program of research designed to create a new diagnostic algorithm for endometriosis. The first part of the study describes the development of our initial algorithm using retrospective cross sectional transvaginal ultrasounds (n = 749), and magnetic resonance images (n = 89 private, n = 8984 public) from 9822 participants overall aged 18 to 45 years, collected between September 2011 and September 2022. Participants/materials, setting, methods Using public MRIs, we pre-trained a machine learning model, and fine-tuned the algorithm using private eMRIs to detect POD obliteration. Then unpaired eTVUSs were introduced to further improve our diagnostic model. We used a machine learning method known as Masked Autoencoder pretraining, which is unsupervised learning reconstructing masked data to generate a larger dataset. Then we embedded the data, compressing a large dataset into a small representation with the most salient features. Main results and the role of chance Scant training samples limited the generalisability of a 3D Vision Transformer to classify POD obliteration from MRI volumes, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 65.0%. However, the masked auto-encoder pre-training partially mitigates this issue, improving the AUC to 87.2%. Adding knowledge distillation, and training a 3D Vision Transformer from scratch on such a small dataset is still challenging, with an AUC of 66.7%. However, adding both together: The knowledge distillation performance of 3D Vision Transformer with masked auto-encoder pre-training reaches an AUC of 77.2%, worse than without knowledge distillation, with an AUC of 87.2%. This could be due to the excessive domain shift between the pre-training dataset and TVUS dataset. However, fine-tuning the model from masked auto-encoder pre-training, the model improves accuracy from AUC=87.2% to AUC=90.6%. With all the steps using unmatched imaging from an alternative modality, this model ultimately demonstrated improvement in the AUC from 65% to 90% on our private MRI dataset. This is the first POD obliteration detection method that distils knowledge from TVUS to MRI using unpaired data, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy of endometriosis from MRI; and the first machine learning method automatically detecting POD obliteration from MRI data to diagnose endometriosis. Limitations, reasons for caution Our eMRI datasets had some confounding problems, present as a result of artefacts, mislabelling, and misreporting. These were resolved using model checking, student auditing and expert radiology review. We will further test our algorithm with a diagnostic test accuracy study on at least two test cohorts. Wider implications of the findings Pre-training using digital data from different imaging modalities can improve the diagnosis of endometriosis especially when either imaging modality is missing. Provided specialist scanning is available, women with endometriosis will be able to obtain faster diagnosis prior to surgery. Trial registration number ACTRN12623000646640

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,494
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,870

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetEndometriosis Research and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207