MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400296520 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae108.656

P-289 Optimising the detection of obliterated Pouch of Douglas for endometriosis diagnosis, by combining unpaired endometriosis ultrasounds and magnetic resonance imaging using Artificial Intelligence

2024· article· en· W4400296520 on OpenAlexaff
Jodie Avery, Hu Wang, Mathew Leonardi, Steven Knox, Alison Deslandes, Minh‐Son To, Gustavo Carneiro, G. Condous, M. Louise Hull

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisMagnetic resonance imagingPouchMedicineRadiologyGynecologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Can we improve the diagnostic accuracy of the detection of POD obliteration in endometriosis magnetic resonance imaging, by leveraging results from unpaired eTVUS data sets? Summary answer We illustrate effective multimodal analysis methods improve POD obliteration detection accuracy from eMRI datasets, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 65.0% to 90.6%. What is known already Traditionally, women investigated for pelvic pain and endometriosis, wait 6.4 years for laparoscopic diagnosis. There is a need for a more timely, non-invasive, accessible diagnostic tool. IMAGENDO is designed to combine eTVUS and eMRI using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to address this delay. We have previously demonstrated detection of pelvic endometriosis, including Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration, has a 95% specificity from endometriosis ultrasounds (eTVUS) and 72% from endometriosis magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI). This preliminary data has shown our novel multimodal AI approach, using imaging data from eTVUS and eMRIs, can improve diagnostic accuracy when detecting POD obliteration in endometriosis. Study design, size, duration The IMAGENDO study is a program of research designed to create a new diagnostic algorithm for endometriosis. The first part of the study describes the development of our initial algorithm using retrospective cross sectional transvaginal ultrasounds (n = 749), and magnetic resonance images (n = 89 private, n = 8984 public) from 9822 participants overall aged 18 to 45 years, collected between September 2011 and September 2022. Participants/materials, setting, methods Using public MRIs, we pre-trained a machine learning model, and fine-tuned the algorithm using private eMRIs to detect POD obliteration. Then unpaired eTVUSs were introduced to further improve our diagnostic model. We used a machine learning method known as Masked Autoencoder pretraining, which is unsupervised learning reconstructing masked data to generate a larger dataset. Then we embedded the data, compressing a large dataset into a small representation with the most salient features. Main results and the role of chance Scant training samples limited the generalisability of a 3D Vision Transformer to classify POD obliteration from MRI volumes, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 65.0%. However, the masked auto-encoder pre-training partially mitigates this issue, improving the AUC to 87.2%. Adding knowledge distillation, and training a 3D Vision Transformer from scratch on such a small dataset is still challenging, with an AUC of 66.7%. However, adding both together: The knowledge distillation performance of 3D Vision Transformer with masked auto-encoder pre-training reaches an AUC of 77.2%, worse than without knowledge distillation, with an AUC of 87.2%. This could be due to the excessive domain shift between the pre-training dataset and TVUS dataset. However, fine-tuning the model from masked auto-encoder pre-training, the model improves accuracy from AUC=87.2% to AUC=90.6%. With all the steps using unmatched imaging from an alternative modality, this model ultimately demonstrated improvement in the AUC from 65% to 90% on our private MRI dataset. This is the first POD obliteration detection method that distils knowledge from TVUS to MRI using unpaired data, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy of endometriosis from MRI; and the first machine learning method automatically detecting POD obliteration from MRI data to diagnose endometriosis. Limitations, reasons for caution Our eMRI datasets had some confounding problems, present as a result of artefacts, mislabelling, and misreporting. These were resolved using model checking, student auditing and expert radiology review. We will further test our algorithm with a diagnostic test accuracy study on at least two test cohorts. Wider implications of the findings Pre-training using digital data from different imaging modalities can improve the diagnosis of endometriosis especially when either imaging modality is missing. Provided specialist scanning is available, women with endometriosis will be able to obtain faster diagnosis prior to surgery. Trial registration number ACTRN12623000646640

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207