MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400297015 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae108.788

P-439 Analysis of Products of Conception (POC) using Whole Genome Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in pregnancy loss after euploid or mosaic embryo transfer

2024· article· en· W4400297015 sur OpenAlexaffabout
S Chen, Rina Abramov, Mitko Madjunkov, C.L. Librach, Svetlana Madjunkova

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensCReATe Fertility Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmbryo transferBiologyPloidyProducts of conceptionEmbryoGenomeMosaicWhole genome sequencingPregnancyGeneticsGestation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question What is the outcome of genetic assessment for fetal chromosomal aberrations in miscarriages after euploid/mosaic embryo transfers (ET)? Summary answer POC testing should be recommended in patients with E/M-ET to screen for chromosomal aberrations occurring post-implantation or beyond the detection limit of PGT-A testing What is known already Spontaneous abortion is the most common complication of pregnancy, affecting approximately 15% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Although the etiology is diverse, fetal chromosomal aberrations account for 50-70% of first trimester miscarriages. Assessment of the fetal chromosomal composition is recommended by ACOG guidelines and aids in counselling and management of patients’ reproductive options. The value of this assessment in patients with miscarriage after euploid/mosaic ET has not evaluated. At the same time there is generally a lack of follow-up studies to examine the accuracy of PGT-A testing and investigate the rates of post-implantation errors causing miscarriage. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study had REB approval. This study was performed at the CReATe Fertility Centre and its Reproductive Genetics Laboratory in Toronto, Canada, between January 2019-December 2023.We evaluated the molecular karyotype of POC samples from first trimester <12GW miscarriages after ART: IVF-PGT-group euploid (E) and mosaic (M) embryo transfers (ET) and IVF-group; IUI and natural conception-NC groups; while controlling for maternal cell contamination (MCC) by high-resolution whole genome NGS. Participants/materials, setting, methods 549 POC samples from early miscarriages after fertility treatment were obtained by suction-dilatation-and curettage. Selection of fetal tissue/chorionic villi (4 representative samples for each case) was performed under a dissecting microscope. Maternal and paternal DNA was obtained to test for MCC. MCC was determined by testing maternal/gestational carrier and fetal DNA (fDNA) with highly informative STRs (AmpFLSTR Identifiler kit). Whole genome low-pass NGS (0.1xcoverage) was performed using the Illumina platform and analyzed with NxClinical Software. Main results and the role of chance Fetal tissue was obtained from 90.7% (498/549) of tested samples and the rest had MCC (9.3%, 51/549): IVF-PGT-A(n = 183), IVF(n = 92), IUI(n = 46) and NC(n = 173). The overall mean maternal age was 37±3.2years. The average gestational age at D&C was 8w4d (range 5w-12w6d). Overall, NGS analysis of fDNA showed 44.6% male and 55.3% female fetuses, 57.6% (287/498) were euploid, 39.5% (197/498) were aneuploid and 1.8% (9/498) were mosaic. In IVF-PGT-A group there were 169 POC from euploid ET and 14 from mosaic ET. 98.2% (n = 166/169) of POCs from IVF-PGT-A euploid-ETs were confirmed as euploid, and 3 had confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (trisomy-11, trisomy-4, monosomy-X). POC from mosaic-ET (n = 14), showed CPM in 3/14(21.4%): TE mosaicism was confirmed in 1/14(7.1%), 2/14(14.3%) had CPM differing from the PGT-A result, 11/14(78.6%) were euploid. POC euploidy rate in IVF (no PGT-A) group was 59.8%(55/92), in IUI 34.8%(16/46) and in NC 24.3%(42/173). In NC group CPM was detected in 1.7%(3/173). The frequency of aberrations detected in POC(n = 197) were: T22, 16.5%; T16,12.9%; T15, 11.3%; T20, 5.2%; T8, 3.6%; T7, T9 and T13, 3.1%; T10 and T14, 2.6%; T18 and T21, 2.1%; T12, 1.5%; 1% of each T2, T4 and T11; monosomy-X,6.7% and 11.3% triploid (69,XXY or 69,XXX). Limitations, reasons for caution MCC is relatively high in POC samples from early pregnancies (9.3%) and controlling for it is warranted. Although 4 representative samples of placental tissue were tested, the true extent and existence of CPM may not be captured correctly. Wider implications of the findings NGS analysis of POC from first trimester miscarriages after fertility treatment would improve diagnostic accuracy, and could aid in patient counselling and management. We observed high PGT-A accuracy (100% for gender) and 98.2% for fetal ploidy with CPM rate of 1.8% (which is lower than observed after CVS (4%)). Trial registration number not applicable

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,328
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,537

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,109
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsTravaux en français237 207