MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401166941 · doi:10.1162/leon_r_02571

The Belgian Photonovel, 1954–1985

2024· article· en· W4401166941 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mike Mosher

Notice bibliographique

RevueLeonardo · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As I was studying French in grade school, my parents encouraged me to buy a couple Francophonic comic books on a summer trip to Canada. One was Tintin magazine, containing a variety of comic strips and their characters. The other—Star Cine Vaillance, depicting a (disturbingly relevant in 2024) movie about Israelis fighting Arabs—was a photonovel. Published in Paris although edited in Rome, it was available in Belgium, Canada, and Switzerland.Belgium was a center of magazine publishing, and the book’s foreword, “Time Traveling in a Lost World,” discusses the range of Belgian photonovels and their publishers. Their ephemerality meant a failure until recently to be properly collected and archived, but now they’re well represented in the digitized Photo-Lit collection. From 1954 to 1985, more than 600 photonovels appeared in women’s magazines, with tales that appealed to modern women, not shy to mention divorce, abortion, and domestic violence. Their target audience was middle-class and working women in a time of changing roles. Shop and office employees and housewives could be depicted as stylish, flirtatious, or independent.These melodramas for women’s weekly magazines were criticized by the Catholic Church and the government as immoral, perhaps communist. The communists criticized them as lacking class consciousness and being too individualistic. There were often two versions of a photonovel, both Francophone and in Dutch. Titles were often changed in translation.Film stills from Giubbe Rosse, a 1940 Cecil DeMille western, were assembled into an early example of the format. In 1946, some stories that had originated in Rome were hand-drawn in Belgium. In 1950, photonovels appeared in France, and in Belgium in 1954. In cinematic style, “Rendez Vous” (1954) listed the actors in their roles at the beginning, while italic text in all caps was superimposed upon the photographs. Word balloons began to appear on the photographs in about 1960. A 1957 story in the magazine Ons Volk was shot in the Grand Place, Brussels. They weren’t all fictitious— aviator Jacqueline Auriol was profiled in a 1956 story, and bicyclist Eddy Merckx in a Sportif ’68/Sport ’68 feature that year.The chapter “Making Photonovels” follows the process from script to drawn storyboards to shots. Photographer Jean Lepeltier shot 80 photonovels, Hubert Serra directed 184, and Richard Keller 46 of them (including one for Femmes D’aujourd’hui magazine, published in color in the early 1980s). Keller was popular enough to appear in a contest “Voulez Vous Tourner Avec Moi?” in 1960, where the winner would appear in a Roma-Film photonovel. Two female readers won and were teamed with French actor Jean-Claude Pascal for the shoot.Layout was important, as was the proper balance of large and small photographs on the page, often shot by well-known photographers. Besides advertisements, the design and illustrations in the magazines are characteristic of their decades. The rotogravure printing process produced some grain (which this reader thinks adds an old-movie visual cachet). The print shop S.A.R., or S.A. de Rotagravure d’Art, was proud of their women’s magazine clients that featured photonovels.With The Belgian Photonovel, Clarissa Colangelo has given us a fine, thorough, yet readable chronicle of this area of publishing history.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,731
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLeonardoMême sujetHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesTravaux en français237 207