Bibliographic record
Abstract
As I was studying French in grade school, my parents encouraged me to buy a couple Francophonic comic books on a summer trip to Canada. One was Tintin magazine, containing a variety of comic strips and their characters. The other—Star Cine Vaillance, depicting a (disturbingly relevant in 2024) movie about Israelis fighting Arabs—was a photonovel. Published in Paris although edited in Rome, it was available in Belgium, Canada, and Switzerland.Belgium was a center of magazine publishing, and the book’s foreword, “Time Traveling in a Lost World,” discusses the range of Belgian photonovels and their publishers. Their ephemerality meant a failure until recently to be properly collected and archived, but now they’re well represented in the digitized Photo-Lit collection. From 1954 to 1985, more than 600 photonovels appeared in women’s magazines, with tales that appealed to modern women, not shy to mention divorce, abortion, and domestic violence. Their target audience was middle-class and working women in a time of changing roles. Shop and office employees and housewives could be depicted as stylish, flirtatious, or independent.These melodramas for women’s weekly magazines were criticized by the Catholic Church and the government as immoral, perhaps communist. The communists criticized them as lacking class consciousness and being too individualistic. There were often two versions of a photonovel, both Francophone and in Dutch. Titles were often changed in translation.Film stills from Giubbe Rosse, a 1940 Cecil DeMille western, were assembled into an early example of the format. In 1946, some stories that had originated in Rome were hand-drawn in Belgium. In 1950, photonovels appeared in France, and in Belgium in 1954. In cinematic style, “Rendez Vous” (1954) listed the actors in their roles at the beginning, while italic text in all caps was superimposed upon the photographs. Word balloons began to appear on the photographs in about 1960. A 1957 story in the magazine Ons Volk was shot in the Grand Place, Brussels. They weren’t all fictitious— aviator Jacqueline Auriol was profiled in a 1956 story, and bicyclist Eddy Merckx in a Sportif ’68/Sport ’68 feature that year.The chapter “Making Photonovels” follows the process from script to drawn storyboards to shots. Photographer Jean Lepeltier shot 80 photonovels, Hubert Serra directed 184, and Richard Keller 46 of them (including one for Femmes D’aujourd’hui magazine, published in color in the early 1980s). Keller was popular enough to appear in a contest “Voulez Vous Tourner Avec Moi?” in 1960, where the winner would appear in a Roma-Film photonovel. Two female readers won and were teamed with French actor Jean-Claude Pascal for the shoot.Layout was important, as was the proper balance of large and small photographs on the page, often shot by well-known photographers. Besides advertisements, the design and illustrations in the magazines are characteristic of their decades. The rotogravure printing process produced some grain (which this reader thinks adds an old-movie visual cachet). The print shop S.A.R., or S.A. de Rotagravure d’Art, was proud of their women’s magazine clients that featured photonovels.With The Belgian Photonovel, Clarissa Colangelo has given us a fine, thorough, yet readable chronicle of this area of publishing history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".