724 - A phase 2b, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezpegaldesleukin in adults with severe to very-severe alopecia areata
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction & Objectives Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder resulting in patchy, non-scaring hair loss. The pathogenesis for AA involves loss of immune privilege for the hair follicle through overactivity of the Th1 and Th17 cells and dysfunction of regulatory T cells (Treg).1 Rezpegaldesleukin (REZPEG: NKTR-358) is a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated recombinant human interleukin 2 (rhIL-2) with the ability to selectively promote the activation and up-to 12-fold expansion of Tregs, while having relatively minimal effect on conventional T cells (Tcons).2 REZPEG is a biologic therapy and represents a potential novel therapeutic approach for patients with severe to very-severe AA. There are currently no biologic therapies approved for the treatment of AA. REZPEG has previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematous. Specifically, a Phase 1b study of REZPEG for patients with moderate-to-severe AD demonstrated a rapid time to response (2-4 weeks) during induction therapy and a prolonged durability of response, i.e., throughout the 36-week follow-up after cessation of therapy. These results support further development of REZPEG for patients with moderate to severe AD (phase 2b study ongoing, NCT06136741) and other inflammatory skin diseases, including AA. Objective Evaluate the efficacy and safety of REZPEG in patients with severe alopecia areata. Materials & Methods We are conducting a Phase 2b, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter study of REZPEG vs placebo for JAK-inhibitor naïve patients with severe to very severe AA. Eligibility requires adult males (aged 18-60 years) or adult females (aged 18-70) with severe to very severe AA with the following inclusion criteria: baseline Severity Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≥ 50, stable hair loss for 6-months, current episode of severe AA of less than 8-years, and no hair loss from causes other than AA. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 3:3:2 ratio to 2 different REZPEG dosing regimens vs. placebo, administered subcutaneously, during the treatment period and all patients will undergo an extended follow-up. The primary endpoint for this study is the percent change from baseline in SALT score at end of treatment period. Key secondary/exploratory endpoints include the following: percent change from baseline in SALT score at other assessed timepoints, proportions with ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% reduction in SALT at end of treatment period and other assessed timepoints, proportion of patients with absolute SALT score ≤ 10, ≤ 20, ≤ 30, ≤ 50 at end of treatment period and other assessed timepoints, safety/tolerability, various patient reported outcomes (PROs), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results Trial ongoing (NCT 06340360). Conclusion REZPEG is a novel regulatory T cell stimulating therapy that may confer prolonged therapeutic benefit for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions, including AA and AD. This phase 2b trial is evaluating the efficacy and safety of multiple dosing regimens of REZPEG in JAK-inhibitor and biologic-therapy naïve patients with severe to very severe alopecia areata.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».