624 - Vitiligo biomarker CXCL10 correlates with clinical response in the phase 2 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction/Background Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation of the selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and is the first and only repigmentation treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission for nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ≥12 years old. Objectives To evaluate treatment-associated changes in biomarkers among patients with vitiligo, correlate changes in key biomarkers with efficacy, and assess the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream. Methods The phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study (NCT04896385) was conducted in adult patients (≥18 years) with vitiligo ≤50% of total body surface area. Patients were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream for 24 weeks, after which all patients could apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through Week 52. Changes from baseline in local and systemic immune biomarkers, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), were evaluated at Weeks 4, 12, and 24. The relative expression of >3000 serum protein analytes was assessed using the Olink Explore platform, and a validated Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay was used to confirm absolute levels of serum CXCL10. Relative CXCL10 expression was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from isolated biopsy samples. Punch biopsies (2.5 mm) were taken from lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline and lesional skin (even if the lesion had cleared) at Weeks 12, 24, and 40. Treatment efficacy was determined by the percentage change from baseline in facial and total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI and T-VASI, respectively). Safety was evaluated by the frequency and severity of adverse events. Results The study enrolled 60 patients (ruxolitinib cream, n=41; vehicle, n=19). Patients’ mean (SD) age was 44.7 (12.8) years, 56.7% were male, and 53.3% had lighter skin (Fitzpatrick skin types I–III). At baseline, patients had a median (range) disease duration of 12.0 (0.1–52.9) years and mean (SD) F-VASI and T-VASI scores of 1.1 (0.6) and 12.1 (9.4), respectively. Olink Explore identified few differentially expressed proteins in patient sera (adjusted P<0.05 and log2 fold change >1.25), including CXCL10, SH2D1A, and granzyme B. As early as Week 12, serum CXCL10 levels (in MSD assay) were significantly reduced in ruxolitinib cream–treated patients compared with baseline. Skin CXCL10 levels were similar in lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline but were significantly lowered in lesional skin at Week 12 with ruxolitinib cream. In ruxolitinib cream–treated patients, significant mean [SD] percentage reductions from baseline were seen in F-VASI scores at Week 12 (–32.9 [33.6]) and in T-VASI scores at Week 24 (–21.2 [18.5]). Further, T-VASI scores significantly correlated with a change in serum CXCL10 levels between baseline and Week 24. Most systemic proteins did not correlate or only weakly correlated with F-VASI and T-VASI scores. Through Week 24, 46.3% of 41 patients who applied ruxolitinib cream reported treatment-emergent adverse events (none serious), the most common being COVID-19 (9.8%), application site acne (4.9%), and application site rash (4.9%). Conclusions Taken together, these data are consistent with the role of the interferon-gamma:CXCL10 axis as a central mediator of vitiligo pathogenesis. Serum CXCL10 levels decreased significantly in patients who applied ruxolitinib cream, which correlated with improvement in T-VASI scores. Additionally, skin CXCL10 levels were significantly reduced after 12 weeks of ruxolitinib cream treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».