MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401436098 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae266.008

624 - Vitiligo biomarker CXCL10 correlates with clinical response in the phase 2 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study

2024· article· en· W4401436098 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Passeron, Mark Lebwohl, Charles Lynde, Maryam Shayesteh Alam, Vivian Laquer, Jennifer Beecker, Anand K. Ganesan, Angelina Volkova, Babak Soltanalizadeh, Deanna Kornacki, Susan Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsBarrie Urology GroupLynde Centre for Dermatology
FundersAstellas PharmaLEO PharmaGaldermaIncyteCelgeneSanofiAmgenPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsVitiligoMedicineRuxolitinibTolerabilityBiomarkerInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialClinical trialDermatologyGastroenterologyOncologyAdverse effectMyelofibrosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation of the selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and is the first and only repigmentation treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission for nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ≥12 years old. Objectives To evaluate treatment-associated changes in biomarkers among patients with vitiligo, correlate changes in key biomarkers with efficacy, and assess the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream. Methods The phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study (NCT04896385) was conducted in adult patients (≥18 years) with vitiligo ≤50% of total body surface area. Patients were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream for 24 weeks, after which all patients could apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through Week 52. Changes from baseline in local and systemic immune biomarkers, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), were evaluated at Weeks 4, 12, and 24. The relative expression of >3000 serum protein analytes was assessed using the Olink Explore platform, and a validated Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay was used to confirm absolute levels of serum CXCL10. Relative CXCL10 expression was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from isolated biopsy samples. Punch biopsies (2.5 mm) were taken from lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline and lesional skin (even if the lesion had cleared) at Weeks 12, 24, and 40. Treatment efficacy was determined by the percentage change from baseline in facial and total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI and T-VASI, respectively). Safety was evaluated by the frequency and severity of adverse events. Results The study enrolled 60 patients (ruxolitinib cream, n=41; vehicle, n=19). Patients’ mean (SD) age was 44.7 (12.8) years, 56.7% were male, and 53.3% had lighter skin (Fitzpatrick skin types I–III). At baseline, patients had a median (range) disease duration of 12.0 (0.1–52.9) years and mean (SD) F-VASI and T-VASI scores of 1.1 (0.6) and 12.1 (9.4), respectively. Olink Explore identified few differentially expressed proteins in patient sera (adjusted P<0.05 and log2 fold change >1.25), including CXCL10, SH2D1A, and granzyme B. As early as Week 12, serum CXCL10 levels (in MSD assay) were significantly reduced in ruxolitinib cream–treated patients compared with baseline. Skin CXCL10 levels were similar in lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline but were significantly lowered in lesional skin at Week 12 with ruxolitinib cream. In ruxolitinib cream–treated patients, significant mean [SD] percentage reductions from baseline were seen in F-VASI scores at Week 12 (–32.9 [33.6]) and in T-VASI scores at Week 24 (–21.2 [18.5]). Further, T-VASI scores significantly correlated with a change in serum CXCL10 levels between baseline and Week 24. Most systemic proteins did not correlate or only weakly correlated with F-VASI and T-VASI scores. Through Week 24, 46.3% of 41 patients who applied ruxolitinib cream reported treatment-emergent adverse events (none serious), the most common being COVID-19 (9.8%), application site acne (4.9%), and application site rash (4.9%). Conclusions Taken together, these data are consistent with the role of the interferon-gamma:CXCL10 axis as a central mediator of vitiligo pathogenesis. Serum CXCL10 levels decreased significantly in patients who applied ruxolitinib cream, which correlated with improvement in T-VASI scores. Additionally, skin CXCL10 levels were significantly reduced after 12 weeks of ruxolitinib cream treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207