624 - Vitiligo biomarker CXCL10 correlates with clinical response in the phase 2 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction/Background Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation of the selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and is the first and only repigmentation treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission for nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ≥12 years old. Objectives To evaluate treatment-associated changes in biomarkers among patients with vitiligo, correlate changes in key biomarkers with efficacy, and assess the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream. Methods The phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled TRuE-V mechanism of action study (NCT04896385) was conducted in adult patients (≥18 years) with vitiligo ≤50% of total body surface area. Patients were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream for 24 weeks, after which all patients could apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through Week 52. Changes from baseline in local and systemic immune biomarkers, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), were evaluated at Weeks 4, 12, and 24. The relative expression of >3000 serum protein analytes was assessed using the Olink Explore platform, and a validated Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay was used to confirm absolute levels of serum CXCL10. Relative CXCL10 expression was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from isolated biopsy samples. Punch biopsies (2.5 mm) were taken from lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline and lesional skin (even if the lesion had cleared) at Weeks 12, 24, and 40. Treatment efficacy was determined by the percentage change from baseline in facial and total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI and T-VASI, respectively). Safety was evaluated by the frequency and severity of adverse events. Results The study enrolled 60 patients (ruxolitinib cream, n=41; vehicle, n=19). Patients’ mean (SD) age was 44.7 (12.8) years, 56.7% were male, and 53.3% had lighter skin (Fitzpatrick skin types I–III). At baseline, patients had a median (range) disease duration of 12.0 (0.1–52.9) years and mean (SD) F-VASI and T-VASI scores of 1.1 (0.6) and 12.1 (9.4), respectively. Olink Explore identified few differentially expressed proteins in patient sera (adjusted P<0.05 and log2 fold change >1.25), including CXCL10, SH2D1A, and granzyme B. As early as Week 12, serum CXCL10 levels (in MSD assay) were significantly reduced in ruxolitinib cream–treated patients compared with baseline. Skin CXCL10 levels were similar in lesional and nonlesional skin at baseline but were significantly lowered in lesional skin at Week 12 with ruxolitinib cream. In ruxolitinib cream–treated patients, significant mean [SD] percentage reductions from baseline were seen in F-VASI scores at Week 12 (–32.9 [33.6]) and in T-VASI scores at Week 24 (–21.2 [18.5]). Further, T-VASI scores significantly correlated with a change in serum CXCL10 levels between baseline and Week 24. Most systemic proteins did not correlate or only weakly correlated with F-VASI and T-VASI scores. Through Week 24, 46.3% of 41 patients who applied ruxolitinib cream reported treatment-emergent adverse events (none serious), the most common being COVID-19 (9.8%), application site acne (4.9%), and application site rash (4.9%). Conclusions Taken together, these data are consistent with the role of the interferon-gamma:CXCL10 axis as a central mediator of vitiligo pathogenesis. Serum CXCL10 levels decreased significantly in patients who applied ruxolitinib cream, which correlated with improvement in T-VASI scores. Additionally, skin CXCL10 levels were significantly reduced after 12 weeks of ruxolitinib cream treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".