MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401519610 · doi:10.46690/elder.2024.02.04

How leaders’ empowering behavior influences teacher’s positive voice behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy and burnout

2024· article· en· W4401519610 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ao Liang, Sudan Wu, Shuya Xiao, Tianyang Wen, Jacob Oppong Nkansah

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducation and lifelong development research. · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCommunication in Education and Healthcare
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyBurnoutSocial psychologySelf-efficacyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study examines the psychological process by which delegative leadership affects subordinates' positive voice behavior in the context of educational management. The theoretical model proposes that teachers' self-efficacy and burnout mediate the relationship between school managers' empowering behavior and teachers' positive voice behavior. Based on 351 samples from primary schools in Shenzhen, China, the findings support the mediating role of teachers' self-efficacy in partially explaining the effect of school managers' empowering behavior. This study elucidates the psychological process through which delegative leadership influences teachers' positive voice behavior and provides practical suggestions for school leaders/managers to deepen their understanding of how to help employees express their opinions in organizations. Cited as: Liang, A., Wu, S., Xiao, S., Wen, T., Nkansah, J. (2024). How leaders’ empowering behavior influences teacher’s positive voice behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy and burnout. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 1(2): 82-91. https://doi.org/10.46690/elder.2024.02.04 References: Afzal, S., Arshad, M., Saleem, S., & Farooq, O. (2019). The impact of perceived supervisor support on employees’ turnover intention and task performance: Mediation of self-efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 38(5), 369-382. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 90(5), 945–955. Ali, M., Lei, S. H. E. N., Jie, Z. S., & Rahman, M. A. (2018). Empowering leadership and employee performance: A mediating role of thriving at work. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 9(2), 1-14. Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487-511. Ashtari, Z., Farhady, Y., & Khodaee, M. R. (2009). Relationship between job burnout and work performance in a sample of Iranian mental health staff. African Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 71-74. Atik, S., & Celik, O. T. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between school principals’ empowering leadership style and teachers’ job satisfaction: The role of trust and psychological empowerment. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 177-193. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs. London. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. Biemann, T., Kearney, E., & Marggraf, K. (2015). Empowering leadership and managers’ career perceptions: Examining effects at both the individual and the team level. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 775-789. Çavuş, M.F., & Demir, Y. (2010). The impacts of structural and psychological empowerment on burnout:A research on staff nurses in Turkish state hospitals. Canadian Social Science, 6(4), 63-72. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 602-616. Chughtai, M. S., & Rizvi, S. T. H. (2020). Empowering leadership and occupational burnout: A moderated mediation model of employee optimism, employee hardiness and job crafting. NICE Research Journal, 13(1), 122-157. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. Davis, J., & Wilson, S. M. (2000). Principals’ efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6), 349-353. Dağlı, E., & Kalkan, F. (2021). The relationship between empowering leadership behaviors of school principals and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and job satisfaction levels.TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. De Simone, S., Planta, A., & Cicotto, G. (2018). The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses’ turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 130-140. Dorji, P., & Soranastaporn, S. (2015, December). A study of teacher empowerment as perceived by ESL teachers in central Bhutan. In The 6th National Graduate Conference. Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 514-525. Febrian, W. D. (2024). The effectiveness of delegation leadership and servant leadership in law firms. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 5(4), 830-838. Friedman, I. A. (1999). Turning our schools into a healthier workplace: Bridging between professional self-efficacy and professional demands. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 166–175). Cambridge University Press. Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). Teacher burnout: A review of sources and ramifications. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 6(1), 24-39. Gilbert, S., Laschinger, H. K., & Leiter, M. (2010). The mediating effect of burnout on the relationship between structural empowerment and organizational citizenship behaviours. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(3), 339-348. Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11-34. Hersey, P. (1976). Situational leadership: some aspects of its influence on organizational development. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley. Jaffery, H., & Farooq, H. (2015). The impact of structural empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior-organization and job performance: A mediating role of burnout. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 273-288. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063, pp. 218-226). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Lomdon. Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Engagement and emotional exhaustion in teachers: Does the school context make a difference? Applied Psychology, 57(Suppl 1), 127-151. Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 466-478. Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934-945. Lai, M. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Self-efficacy, effort, job performance, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: The effect of personalcharacteristics on organization performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 387. Liu, Y. (2015). The review of empowerment leadership. Open Journal of Business and Management, 3(04), 476-482. Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202. Mudallal, R. H., Othman, W. A. M., & Al Hassan, N. F. (2017). Nurses’ burnout: the influence of leader empowering behaviors, work conditions, and demographic traits. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 54, 0046958017724944. Muhammad, N., & Chaudhary, A. H. (2020). Relationship of teachers’ empowerment and organizational commitment at secondary school level in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 69-80. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234. Nong, L., Ye, J. H., & Hong, J. C. (2022). The impact of empowering leadership on preschool teachers’ job well-being in the context of COVID-19: A perspective based on job demands-resources model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895664. Nikolaou, I., Vakola, M., & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37(6), 666-679. Peng, Y., & Mao, C. (2015). The impact of person–job fit on job satisfaction: the mediator role of Self efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 805-813. Pihie, Z. A. L., & Bagheri, A. (2013). Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediation effect of self-regulation. Vocations and Learning, 6, 385-401. Raub, S., & Liao, H. (2012). Doing the right thing without being told: Joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 651-667. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163. Sanchez-Gomez, M., & Breso, E. (2020). In pursuit of work performance: Testing the contribution of emotional intelligence and burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5373. Saloviita, T., & Pakarinen, E. (2021). Teacher burnout explained: Teacher-, student-, and organisation-level variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103221. Schermuly, I., Fellgiebel, A., Wagner, S., Yakushev, I., Stoeter, P., Schmitt, R., Knickenberg, R. J., Bleichner, F., & Beutel, M. E. (2010). Association between cingulum bundle structure and cognitive performance: An observational study in major depression. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 25(6), 355-360. Schmidt, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2010). The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 572-581. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Operant conditioning. The Encyclopedia of Education, 7, 29-33. Thomas, C. H., & Lankau, M. J. (2009). Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Human Resource Management, 48(3), 417-432. Tsai, K. H., Chang, H. C., & Peng, C. Y. (2016). Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: a moderated mediation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 445-463. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226. Warsono, H., & Riduwan, A. (2019). The effect of autocratic, participative, and delegation leadership on work motivation of Indonesian navy personnel. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 7(5), 475-482. Wasserman, E., Ben-eli, S., Yehoshua, O., & Gal, R. (2016). Relationship between the principal’s leadership style and teacher motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(10), 180-192. Xiang, C.C. & Long, L.R. (2013). Participative leadership and employee voice: The mediating role of positive impression management motivation. Management Review, 25(7), 156-166. (in Chinese) Yan, Z. (2018). How to promote employee voice behavior: Analysis based on leadership style perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 10(1), 1814-1823. Yoo, J. (2017). Customer power and frontline employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of psychological empowerment. 51 (1), 238-256. Zhang, S., Bowers, A. J., & Mao, Y. (2021). Authentic leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of interpersonal trust. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 768–785.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,593
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,438

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,096
Tête enseignante GPT0,468
Écart entre enseignants0,373 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducation and lifelong development research.Même sujetCommunication in Education and HealthcareTravaux en français237 207