MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401519610 · doi:10.46690/elder.2024.02.04

How leaders’ empowering behavior influences teacher’s positive voice behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy and burnout

2024· article· en· W4401519610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ao Liang, Sudan Wu, Shuya Xiao, Tianyang Wen, Jacob Oppong Nkansah

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and lifelong development research. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCommunication in Education and Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyBurnoutSocial psychologySelf-efficacyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the psychological process by which delegative leadership affects subordinates' positive voice behavior in the context of educational management. The theoretical model proposes that teachers' self-efficacy and burnout mediate the relationship between school managers' empowering behavior and teachers' positive voice behavior. Based on 351 samples from primary schools in Shenzhen, China, the findings support the mediating role of teachers' self-efficacy in partially explaining the effect of school managers' empowering behavior. This study elucidates the psychological process through which delegative leadership influences teachers' positive voice behavior and provides practical suggestions for school leaders/managers to deepen their understanding of how to help employees express their opinions in organizations. Cited as: Liang, A., Wu, S., Xiao, S., Wen, T., Nkansah, J. (2024). How leaders’ empowering behavior influences teacher’s positive voice behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy and burnout. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 1(2): 82-91. https://doi.org/10.46690/elder.2024.02.04 References: Afzal, S., Arshad, M., Saleem, S., & Farooq, O. (2019). The impact of perceived supervisor support on employees’ turnover intention and task performance: Mediation of self-efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 38(5), 369-382. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 90(5), 945–955. Ali, M., Lei, S. H. E. N., Jie, Z. S., & Rahman, M. A. (2018). Empowering leadership and employee performance: A mediating role of thriving at work. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 9(2), 1-14. Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487-511. Ashtari, Z., Farhady, Y., & Khodaee, M. R. (2009). Relationship between job burnout and work performance in a sample of Iranian mental health staff. African Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 71-74. Atik, S., & Celik, O. T. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between school principals’ empowering leadership style and teachers’ job satisfaction: The role of trust and psychological empowerment. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 177-193. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs. London. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. Biemann, T., Kearney, E., & Marggraf, K. (2015). Empowering leadership and managers’ career perceptions: Examining effects at both the individual and the team level. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 775-789. Çavuş, M.F., & Demir, Y. (2010). The impacts of structural and psychological empowerment on burnout:A research on staff nurses in Turkish state hospitals. Canadian Social Science, 6(4), 63-72. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 602-616. Chughtai, M. S., & Rizvi, S. T. H. (2020). Empowering leadership and occupational burnout: A moderated mediation model of employee optimism, employee hardiness and job crafting. NICE Research Journal, 13(1), 122-157. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. Davis, J., & Wilson, S. M. (2000). Principals’ efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6), 349-353. Dağlı, E., & Kalkan, F. (2021). The relationship between empowering leadership behaviors of school principals and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and job satisfaction levels.TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. De Simone, S., Planta, A., & Cicotto, G. (2018). The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses’ turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 130-140. Dorji, P., & Soranastaporn, S. (2015, December). A study of teacher empowerment as perceived by ESL teachers in central Bhutan. In The 6th National Graduate Conference. Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 514-525. Febrian, W. D. (2024). The effectiveness of delegation leadership and servant leadership in law firms. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 5(4), 830-838. Friedman, I. A. (1999). Turning our schools into a healthier workplace: Bridging between professional self-efficacy and professional demands. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 166–175). Cambridge University Press. Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). Teacher burnout: A review of sources and ramifications. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 6(1), 24-39. Gilbert, S., Laschinger, H. K., & Leiter, M. (2010). The mediating effect of burnout on the relationship between structural empowerment and organizational citizenship behaviours. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(3), 339-348. Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11-34. Hersey, P. (1976). Situational leadership: some aspects of its influence on organizational development. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley. Jaffery, H., & Farooq, H. (2015). The impact of structural empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior-organization and job performance: A mediating role of burnout. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 273-288. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063, pp. 218-226). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Lomdon. Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Engagement and emotional exhaustion in teachers: Does the school context make a difference? Applied Psychology, 57(Suppl 1), 127-151. Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 466-478. Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934-945. Lai, M. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Self-efficacy, effort, job performance, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: The effect of personalcharacteristics on organization performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 387. Liu, Y. (2015). The review of empowerment leadership. Open Journal of Business and Management, 3(04), 476-482. Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202. Mudallal, R. H., Othman, W. A. M., & Al Hassan, N. F. (2017). Nurses’ burnout: the influence of leader empowering behaviors, work conditions, and demographic traits. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 54, 0046958017724944. Muhammad, N., & Chaudhary, A. H. (2020). Relationship of teachers’ empowerment and organizational commitment at secondary school level in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 69-80. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234. Nong, L., Ye, J. H., & Hong, J. C. (2022). The impact of empowering leadership on preschool teachers’ job well-being in the context of COVID-19: A perspective based on job demands-resources model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895664. Nikolaou, I., Vakola, M., & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37(6), 666-679. Peng, Y., & Mao, C. (2015). The impact of person–job fit on job satisfaction: the mediator role of Self efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 805-813. Pihie, Z. A. L., & Bagheri, A. (2013). Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediation effect of self-regulation. Vocations and Learning, 6, 385-401. Raub, S., & Liao, H. (2012). Doing the right thing without being told: Joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 651-667. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163. Sanchez-Gomez, M., & Breso, E. (2020). In pursuit of work performance: Testing the contribution of emotional intelligence and burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5373. Saloviita, T., & Pakarinen, E. (2021). Teacher burnout explained: Teacher-, student-, and organisation-level variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103221. Schermuly, I., Fellgiebel, A., Wagner, S., Yakushev, I., Stoeter, P., Schmitt, R., Knickenberg, R. J., Bleichner, F., & Beutel, M. E. (2010). Association between cingulum bundle structure and cognitive performance: An observational study in major depression. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 25(6), 355-360. Schmidt, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2010). The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 572-581. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Operant conditioning. The Encyclopedia of Education, 7, 29-33. Thomas, C. H., & Lankau, M. J. (2009). Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Human Resource Management, 48(3), 417-432. Tsai, K. H., Chang, H. C., & Peng, C. Y. (2016). Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: a moderated mediation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 445-463. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226. Warsono, H., & Riduwan, A. (2019). The effect of autocratic, participative, and delegation leadership on work motivation of Indonesian navy personnel. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 7(5), 475-482. Wasserman, E., Ben-eli, S., Yehoshua, O., & Gal, R. (2016). Relationship between the principal’s leadership style and teacher motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(10), 180-192. Xiang, C.C. & Long, L.R. (2013). Participative leadership and employee voice: The mediating role of positive impression management motivation. Management Review, 25(7), 156-166. (in Chinese) Yan, Z. (2018). How to promote employee voice behavior: Analysis based on leadership style perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 10(1), 1814-1823. Yoo, J. (2017). Customer power and frontline employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of psychological empowerment. 51 (1), 238-256. Zhang, S., Bowers, A. J., & Mao, Y. (2021). Authentic leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of interpersonal trust. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 768–785.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation and lifelong development research.Same topicCommunication in Education and HealthcareFrench-language works237,207