Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Explicitly—or not—protocols determine much of what we do. Far exceeding traditional notions of “good manners,” protocols are systems of language that regulate how we relate to each other, to our cultural, social, and political environments, and to the technologies that create them. The first publication to critically examine protocols across a wide range of disciplines, As for Protocols brings together contributions by twenty-four international artists, writers, scholars, musicians, architects, and scientists who explore protocols across various fields, foregrounding opportunities for creating new protocols that are inclusive and equitable. Through essays, artworks, interviews, and scores, the book speaks to protocols as practice—neither conventional mannerisms nor abstract concepts, but material processes, relational affinities, shared responsibilities, and mutual care. Edited by Re’al Christian, Carin Kuoni, and Eriola Pira, with an opening score by Raven Chacon and contributions by Salome Asega, Carolina Caycedo with Lupita Limón Corrales, Jesse Chun, Asia Dorsey, Taraneh Fazeli and Cannach MacBride, Pablo Helguera, Emmanuel Iduma, Mary Maggic, Shannon Mattern, V. Mitch McEwen with Nadir Jeevanjee, Rashaun Mitchell with Silas Riener, Romy Opperman, Rasheedah Phillips, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson with Maria Hupfield, Ultra-red with Robert Sember, and Underground Resistance. "At a time of intersecting and increasingly alarming global crises, it is incumbent upon us, as differentially positioned artistic researchers, makers, and workers, to reassess our roles and responsibilities in the context of emergent and urgent global crises: our job is not only to ask why art, but which art (forms/practices/commitments) do we offer our energy and life-blood to? As for Protocols, as an edited volume/catalogue as well as archive of almost two years of thinking, making, and debating organized through the Vera List Center, touches on so many of the perspectives, vocalities, and literacies that the project of art attuned to social and ecological justice needs right now. It is wide-ranging, smart, diverse, attentive to constitutive difference, and productive of generative confluence." —<b>Natalie Loveless</b>, University of Alberta "As for Protocols is an exciting volume of reflections on the concept or convention we know as protocol—sets of techno-cultural procedures that organize communicative interaction. … In As for Protocols chapters build upon each other; concepts developed in one chapter reappear in subsequent ones efficaciously, providing continuity across projects whose methods and contexts are very different. The writing is consistently accessible and insightful from start to finish." —<b>Kelli Moore</b>, New York University <b>Re’al Christian</b> is assistant director of editorial initiatives at the Vera List Center for Art and Politics at The New School. She is the co-editor of Maria Hupfield’s Breaking Protocol, published by the VLC and Inventory Press. She is a contributing editor at ART PAPERS and has written texts for numerous magazines, catalogues, and anthologies, including Track Changes: A Handbook for Art Criticism (Paper Monument 2023), among others. <b>Carin Kuoni</b> is senior director and chief curator of the Vera List Center for Art and Politics at The New School and Assistant Professor of Visual Studies. She has curated numerous transdisciplinary exhibitions and is editor or co-editor of ten books, most recently Studies into Darkness: On the Perils and Promise of Freedom of Speech and Maria Thereza Alves: Seeds of Change for the Vera List Center and Amherst College Press. <b>Eriola Pira</b> is the curator and director of programs at the Vera List Center for Art and Politics at The New School, working with artists to explore new ideas and present exhibitions, performances, and publications on art and its politics. Her curatorial work and writing have been published and featured in catalogs and publications such as The New York Times, Artforum, Hyperallergic, Bomb, Guernica, and Kosovo 2.0 magazines. An auto-narrated audiobook is available via the "Download" button above.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».