MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401631956 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16012

Revisiting the Agrarian Question: Seed Commons, Peasant Resistance(s), and the Reproduction of Capital Accumulation in International Law

2024· dissertation· en· W4401631956 sur OpenAlexaff
Rachael Lynne Malott

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAgrarian societyCommonsPeasantReproductionMarxist philosophySocial reproductionCapital (architecture)SociologyRestructuringResistance (ecology)CapitalismLawPolitical sciencePolitical economyLaw and economicsSocial capitalPoliticsGeographyAgriculture

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What is the role of international law in agrarian transformations, and how do peasants encounter and engage with it in their everyday lives?This thesis seeks to answer this question by conducting a case study into the ways that Colombian seed networks have utilized strategies and tactics from within and outside the law to push back against the growing seed monopolization and expansion of intellectual property rights.Drawing upon methods of digital ethnography, legal ethnography, and document analysis, as well as bringing together critical agrarian studies and Marxist and Third World Approaches to International law, I demonstrate the various ways that international law has played a central role in fostering the ongoing dispossession of peasants, restructuring property and social relations, engendering ecocide, and reproducing capital accumulation.By examining the resistance to international law "from below," legal scholars can better understand its materialization, limits, and contradictions. H1 iii AcknowledgmentsThe purpose of this section is to be concise with brief notes of thanks, but even while writing this, I am reminded again of the beautiful community I am surrounded by, which made this all possible.I have never been good at keeping things short; if anything is long and drawn out, I want it to be this section.This section offers only a small glimpse of those who have supported me endlessly over the past years, acknowledging and honouring the sacrifices made by many so that I could live out this dream of having this project come to life.First and foremost, I want to thank the Algonquin Anishinaabe peoples and Nation.I completed this thesis as an uninvited settler on these unceded and unsurrendered lands, and this degree would not have been possible otherwise.I thank them for sharing their knowledge and cosmologies with us.I thank them for the Seven Grandfather Teachings.I have incorporated these into my work and into my life.This thesis reaffirms the urgency for landback and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples across Abya Yala and beyond.Second, I thank the workers around the world who made this degree possible.The paper this was written on, the battery of my computer, the janitorial staff who ensure the study rooms and lecture halls are clean for us to learn, and the farmers and migrant labourers who bring the food to our tables.It is never lost on me that I am the one who could write this degree inside the belly of the beast of empire, telling your stories, at the continued expense and implication of the reproduction of capitalism; most of the labour within it is unseen.This degree will not be in vain.Third, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Ania Zbyszewska.I could have an entire section dedicated to her, but I will keep it short.Ania's grad school course on regulating the labouring body was the precursor to this thesis.The course and her careful selection of readings and themes allowed me to see the connections between labour and ecologies, the need for feminist engagements, and the broader processes of capital accumulation down the line.I wish everyone could take this course, and it is an understatement to say that it changed the trajectory of my life.Over the past two years, she has been the best supervisor I could have ever asked for, spending many, many hours reading drafts and reading my work to offer the most generous feedback.Even more of these hours were spent on affective labour, being patient, listening to me, and offering a mentorship and comradeship that allowed me to write this.Even more, through the many struggles and barriers I encountered, she always reminded me that I could finish this work and to take breaks to enjoy things.It is not an exaggeration to say that I would have dropped out long ago had it not been for her.The many meetings, emails, and words of encouragement kept me going, and I cannot believe how lucky I am to have one of the brightest minds and kindest humans in my corner.Dr. Ania not only teaches and shares her deep knowledge of feminist politics with those around her, but she embodies it.One of the many examples of this was during the March 2023 strike when we grad students were in the middle of burnout and so exhausted; Dr. Ania showed up on the picket line every day for us (even bringing her classes), emailed us words of encouragement, and was so determined to help us achieve any gains.This is one of the hundreds of examples of her praxis.I will deeply miss all of these H1 iv meetings and conversations.Although this final copy is a testament to the collective labour from peoples past and present, it is also a bittersweet moment marking that these wonderful days of working together have also slowly drawn to a close.Not everyone can be a great mentor, and certainly not everyone is a comrade.But for whatever reason, the stars aligned, and I was able to gain both.So, in short, thank you endlessly for this help: our department is lucky beyond measure to have you, and if the academe is worth salvaging in any way, it is because of people like you.To my second reader, Dr. Umut zsu: your incredible feedback and guidance on the drafts of this thesis were important beyond measure.You are a scholar I have admired for years and whose work has been so instrumental to my own.Your contributions to international law, history, and Marxism are valued by so many of us around the world.I could have honestly never imagined that you would help me with my own journey in this domain.I am eternally grateful for your close readings, your many wonderful suggestions, and your willingness to see through many (very bad) drafts while understanding and believing in

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,929
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,991

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207