MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401631956 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16012

Revisiting the Agrarian Question: Seed Commons, Peasant Resistance(s), and the Reproduction of Capital Accumulation in International Law

2024· dissertation· en· W4401631956 on OpenAlexaff
Rachael Lynne Malott

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgrarian societyCommonsPeasantReproductionMarxist philosophySocial reproductionCapital (architecture)SociologyRestructuringResistance (ecology)CapitalismLawPolitical sciencePolitical economyLaw and economicsSocial capitalPoliticsGeographyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What is the role of international law in agrarian transformations, and how do peasants encounter and engage with it in their everyday lives?This thesis seeks to answer this question by conducting a case study into the ways that Colombian seed networks have utilized strategies and tactics from within and outside the law to push back against the growing seed monopolization and expansion of intellectual property rights.Drawing upon methods of digital ethnography, legal ethnography, and document analysis, as well as bringing together critical agrarian studies and Marxist and Third World Approaches to International law, I demonstrate the various ways that international law has played a central role in fostering the ongoing dispossession of peasants, restructuring property and social relations, engendering ecocide, and reproducing capital accumulation.By examining the resistance to international law "from below," legal scholars can better understand its materialization, limits, and contradictions. H1 iii AcknowledgmentsThe purpose of this section is to be concise with brief notes of thanks, but even while writing this, I am reminded again of the beautiful community I am surrounded by, which made this all possible.I have never been good at keeping things short; if anything is long and drawn out, I want it to be this section.This section offers only a small glimpse of those who have supported me endlessly over the past years, acknowledging and honouring the sacrifices made by many so that I could live out this dream of having this project come to life.First and foremost, I want to thank the Algonquin Anishinaabe peoples and Nation.I completed this thesis as an uninvited settler on these unceded and unsurrendered lands, and this degree would not have been possible otherwise.I thank them for sharing their knowledge and cosmologies with us.I thank them for the Seven Grandfather Teachings.I have incorporated these into my work and into my life.This thesis reaffirms the urgency for landback and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples across Abya Yala and beyond.Second, I thank the workers around the world who made this degree possible.The paper this was written on, the battery of my computer, the janitorial staff who ensure the study rooms and lecture halls are clean for us to learn, and the farmers and migrant labourers who bring the food to our tables.It is never lost on me that I am the one who could write this degree inside the belly of the beast of empire, telling your stories, at the continued expense and implication of the reproduction of capitalism; most of the labour within it is unseen.This degree will not be in vain.Third, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Ania Zbyszewska.I could have an entire section dedicated to her, but I will keep it short.Ania's grad school course on regulating the labouring body was the precursor to this thesis.The course and her careful selection of readings and themes allowed me to see the connections between labour and ecologies, the need for feminist engagements, and the broader processes of capital accumulation down the line.I wish everyone could take this course, and it is an understatement to say that it changed the trajectory of my life.Over the past two years, she has been the best supervisor I could have ever asked for, spending many, many hours reading drafts and reading my work to offer the most generous feedback.Even more of these hours were spent on affective labour, being patient, listening to me, and offering a mentorship and comradeship that allowed me to write this.Even more, through the many struggles and barriers I encountered, she always reminded me that I could finish this work and to take breaks to enjoy things.It is not an exaggeration to say that I would have dropped out long ago had it not been for her.The many meetings, emails, and words of encouragement kept me going, and I cannot believe how lucky I am to have one of the brightest minds and kindest humans in my corner.Dr. Ania not only teaches and shares her deep knowledge of feminist politics with those around her, but she embodies it.One of the many examples of this was during the March 2023 strike when we grad students were in the middle of burnout and so exhausted; Dr. Ania showed up on the picket line every day for us (even bringing her classes), emailed us words of encouragement, and was so determined to help us achieve any gains.This is one of the hundreds of examples of her praxis.I will deeply miss all of these H1 iv meetings and conversations.Although this final copy is a testament to the collective labour from peoples past and present, it is also a bittersweet moment marking that these wonderful days of working together have also slowly drawn to a close.Not everyone can be a great mentor, and certainly not everyone is a comrade.But for whatever reason, the stars aligned, and I was able to gain both.So, in short, thank you endlessly for this help: our department is lucky beyond measure to have you, and if the academe is worth salvaging in any way, it is because of people like you.To my second reader, Dr. Umut zsu: your incredible feedback and guidance on the drafts of this thesis were important beyond measure.You are a scholar I have admired for years and whose work has been so instrumental to my own.Your contributions to international law, history, and Marxism are valued by so many of us around the world.I could have honestly never imagined that you would help me with my own journey in this domain.I am eternally grateful for your close readings, your many wonderful suggestions, and your willingness to see through many (very bad) drafts while understanding and believing in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207