An Analysis of Housing Market Dynamics: Evaluating Potential Bubbles and Their Implications on Affordability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose Over the past three years, Canada experienced rapidly increasing inflation. Among the many challenges this brought for Canadians, the issue of the affordability of houses and rents is a fundamental one. The rise in Canada’s ratio of the average house price to average rent has fostered further research regarding how this value has changed during the pandemic and its implications for today. This paper extends the research of Allen Head and Huw Lloyd Ellis's exploration of the speculation that Canada is experiencing a housing bubble. A pricing framework is used to assess whether the growth of house prices in Canadian cities since 1987 can be explained by variations in rents, real interest rates and property taxes, known as the “fundamentals.” The magnitude to which house prices have appreciated is contingent upon how participants in the housing market perceive real interest rates. Methodology Firstly, the relevant data needed to conduct our econometric analysis was collected. Data was updated for 27 central metropolitan areas (CMAs) in Canada from 1987 to 2021. Specifically, some of this raw data included rent prices, mortgage rates, interest rates, inflation rates, average and median income, provincial population, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In addition, the MLS price was used. Compiled by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA), it is an index that collects monthly statistics for properties sold via the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) and accessed by Canadian realtors. Once the raw data was compiled, we calculated the predicted price using a user cost model and compared it to the actual price. This user cost model considers factors such as rents, property taxes and interest rates. From this, we calculated the price-rent ratio. The predicted price-rent ratio, named “User Cost Model price,” as presented in the red lines in the following graphs, demonstrates what our model predicts for overvaluation in the housing market. Comparatively, the actual price-rent ratio, “MLS Average,” presented as the blue line, depicts what we observe in real-time. We then computed the differences between the predicted measure from our model and the actual observed MLS price for each year and city. This differential we calculated is a time series of “overvaluations’’ and “undervaluations.” Using this data for each city, we used this measure of difference in valuation in 2020 and 2021 and compared it to the average difference in valuation over an updated base period. Results and Conclusions Referencing the series of graphs produced, we observe substantial increases in overvaluations in Ontario cities. For example, St. Catharines, London and Windsor depict sizeable overvaluations, in addition to other cities across Canada, such as Toronto, Montreal, Gatineau, and Vancouver. Comparatively, we observed undervaluations in cities in Quebec, such as Québec City, Trois-Rivières, and Saguenay. Cities in the Prairies and Atlantic, such as Calgary, Edmonton, and Saint John, seem to share a similar result of undervaluation. However, each appears to rise in overvaluation again in 2020. While there are many reasons we can attribute to these trends, for now, we may only speculate what this means. We learn from our analysis that overvaluation continues to grow despite increasing rents. These results are particularly interesting for our study because there was a possibility that these rent increases were actually anticipated by housing market participants, which should have accounted for some overvaluation in the past. However, based on our work, this is not the case. If this were true, the overvaluation gap would have narrowed, not widened, as in our case. With this updated dataset, upcoming researchers will be able to investigate deeper into the reasons behind the widening overvaluation gap in many Canadian cities. As statistics become more publicly available, we can continue to enhance this dataset and examine how government policies and housing market participants affect interest rate expectations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».