MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402423790 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp17994

An Analysis of Housing Market Dynamics: Evaluating Potential Bubbles and Their Implications on Affordability

2024· article· en· W4402423790 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Izabel Brucaj

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)EconomicsBusinessEconometricsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Over the past three years, Canada experienced rapidly increasing inflation. Among the many challenges this brought for Canadians, the issue of the affordability of houses and rents is a fundamental one. The rise in Canada’s ratio of the average house price to average rent has fostered further research regarding how this value has changed during the pandemic and its implications for today. This paper extends the research of Allen Head and Huw Lloyd Ellis's exploration of the speculation that Canada is experiencing a housing bubble. A pricing framework is used to assess whether the growth of house prices in Canadian cities since 1987 can be explained by variations in rents, real interest rates and property taxes, known as the “fundamentals.” The magnitude to which house prices have appreciated is contingent upon how participants in the housing market perceive real interest rates. Methodology Firstly, the relevant data needed to conduct our econometric analysis was collected. Data was updated for 27 central metropolitan areas (CMAs) in Canada from 1987 to 2021. Specifically, some of this raw data included rent prices, mortgage rates, interest rates, inflation rates, average and median income, provincial population, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In addition, the MLS price was used. Compiled by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA), it is an index that collects monthly statistics for properties sold via the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) and accessed by Canadian realtors. Once the raw data was compiled, we calculated the predicted price using a user cost model and compared it to the actual price. This user cost model considers factors such as rents, property taxes and interest rates. From this, we calculated the price-rent ratio. The predicted price-rent ratio, named “User Cost Model price,” as presented in the red lines in the following graphs, demonstrates what our model predicts for overvaluation in the housing market. Comparatively, the actual price-rent ratio, “MLS Average,” presented as the blue line, depicts what we observe in real-time. We then computed the differences between the predicted measure from our model and the actual observed MLS price for each year and city. This differential we calculated is a time series of “overvaluations’’ and “undervaluations.” Using this data for each city, we used this measure of difference in valuation in 2020 and 2021 and compared it to the average difference in valuation over an updated base period. Results and Conclusions Referencing the series of graphs produced, we observe substantial increases in overvaluations in Ontario cities. For example, St. Catharines, London and Windsor depict sizeable overvaluations, in addition to other cities across Canada, such as Toronto, Montreal, Gatineau, and Vancouver. Comparatively, we observed undervaluations in cities in Quebec, such as Québec City, Trois-Rivières, and Saguenay. Cities in the Prairies and Atlantic, such as Calgary, Edmonton, and Saint John, seem to share a similar result of undervaluation. However, each appears to rise in overvaluation again in 2020. While there are many reasons we can attribute to these trends, for now, we may only speculate what this means. We learn from our analysis that overvaluation continues to grow despite increasing rents. These results are particularly interesting for our study because there was a possibility that these rent increases were actually anticipated by housing market participants, which should have accounted for some overvaluation in the past. However, based on our work, this is not the case. If this were true, the overvaluation gap would have narrowed, not widened, as in our case. With this updated dataset, upcoming researchers will be able to investigate deeper into the reasons behind the widening overvaluation gap in many Canadian cities. As statistics become more publicly available, we can continue to enhance this dataset and examine how government policies and housing market participants affect interest rate expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings→Same topicHousing Market and Economics→French-language works237,207→