MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402448863 · doi:10.1242/jeb.246619

Female zebra finches prefer partner's song despite absence of male voices when young

2024· article· en· W4402448863 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Srinivasan

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésZEBRA (computer)ZoologyCommunicationAdult malePsychologyZebra finchDevelopmental psychologyBiologyNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

How do animals adapt their senses to their surroundings? This has fascinated scientists for years, and it turns out that experiences growing up and as an adult play significant roles. Vocal communication is an essential part of social interaction in many animals, including humans – consider how a child learns to speak and respond to their parent's voice, forming strong bonds through communication by voice. But how important is it for female zebra finches to hear male voices when they are young? Can they still form a preference for their partner's trills as adults if deprived of hearing the songs of males as youngsters? Sarah Woolley and Erin Wall at McGill University, Canada, chose zebra finches to find out. Zebra finches are sociable songbirds where the males learn to sing and the females listen closely to their songs to learn how to recognise them, choose mates and form lasting partnerships for life.Wall and Woolley allowed some female zebra finch chicks to grow up with both parents, hearing their father's songs as well as their mother's voices; however, the fathers of other female zebra finch chicks were removed from their cage, so those chicks grew up without hearing the songs of other male birds. Once the chicks had grown up, the duo paired the young adult females with males for 2 weeks in the hope that they would form a lifelong partnership, and, sure enough, they did, regardless of whether they had heard male voices as they grew and developed. Females from both home backgrounds formed stable relationships with their male partners, constructing nests and generally settling down, even though some had not heard a male voice through the time they were growing up. So, it is not necessary for a female to hear a male voice while growing up to be able to form a partnership with a male for life as a young adult.Next, the duo tested the females’ preferences for their partner's songs, allowing them first to select between their male’s courtship serenade and the courtship song of unfamiliar males, before checking whether the females were particularly attracted to the courtship serenade of their partner. Sure enough, after 2 weeks of cohabiting with her new partner, each female was particularly partial to his trills, regardless of her upbringing, and were more keen on courtship calls than general conversation, even when the singer was just some random male. Living with a male and bonding is enough to make his song attractive, regardless of their early life experiences.However, while the couples were developing their relationship over the 2 weeks of the experiment, the researchers also allowed female/female couples to listen in on the conversations of the newly forming couple to find out whether simply listening to the songs of an adult male, without seeing or interacting with him, would allow the females to develop a strong preference for his utterances. However, it did not; females develop a strong attachment to the serenades of their partners and not just any male singing in the vicinity.So, it seems that even without listening to the songs of adult male zebra finches early in life, adult female zebra finches form life-long partnerships and preferences for male song. It's living with a male while forming a life-long attachment that makes his serenade more desirable. However, being deprived of male voices early in life does appear to affect the females’ nesting behaviour, with the females that had been deprived of male song as youngsters spending less time on their nests toward the end of the 2 week bonding period, suggesting that the lack of male song early in life may possibly have delayed breeding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental BiologyMême sujetAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorTravaux en français237 207