MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402448863 · doi:10.1242/jeb.246619

Female zebra finches prefer partner's song despite absence of male voices when young

2024· article· en· W4402448863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Srinivasan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZEBRA (computer)ZoologyCommunicationAdult malePsychologyZebra finchDevelopmental psychologyBiologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How do animals adapt their senses to their surroundings? This has fascinated scientists for years, and it turns out that experiences growing up and as an adult play significant roles. Vocal communication is an essential part of social interaction in many animals, including humans – consider how a child learns to speak and respond to their parent's voice, forming strong bonds through communication by voice. But how important is it for female zebra finches to hear male voices when they are young? Can they still form a preference for their partner's trills as adults if deprived of hearing the songs of males as youngsters? Sarah Woolley and Erin Wall at McGill University, Canada, chose zebra finches to find out. Zebra finches are sociable songbirds where the males learn to sing and the females listen closely to their songs to learn how to recognise them, choose mates and form lasting partnerships for life.Wall and Woolley allowed some female zebra finch chicks to grow up with both parents, hearing their father's songs as well as their mother's voices; however, the fathers of other female zebra finch chicks were removed from their cage, so those chicks grew up without hearing the songs of other male birds. Once the chicks had grown up, the duo paired the young adult females with males for 2 weeks in the hope that they would form a lifelong partnership, and, sure enough, they did, regardless of whether they had heard male voices as they grew and developed. Females from both home backgrounds formed stable relationships with their male partners, constructing nests and generally settling down, even though some had not heard a male voice through the time they were growing up. So, it is not necessary for a female to hear a male voice while growing up to be able to form a partnership with a male for life as a young adult.Next, the duo tested the females’ preferences for their partner's songs, allowing them first to select between their male’s courtship serenade and the courtship song of unfamiliar males, before checking whether the females were particularly attracted to the courtship serenade of their partner. Sure enough, after 2 weeks of cohabiting with her new partner, each female was particularly partial to his trills, regardless of her upbringing, and were more keen on courtship calls than general conversation, even when the singer was just some random male. Living with a male and bonding is enough to make his song attractive, regardless of their early life experiences.However, while the couples were developing their relationship over the 2 weeks of the experiment, the researchers also allowed female/female couples to listen in on the conversations of the newly forming couple to find out whether simply listening to the songs of an adult male, without seeing or interacting with him, would allow the females to develop a strong preference for his utterances. However, it did not; females develop a strong attachment to the serenades of their partners and not just any male singing in the vicinity.So, it seems that even without listening to the songs of adult male zebra finches early in life, adult female zebra finches form life-long partnerships and preferences for male song. It's living with a male while forming a life-long attachment that makes his serenade more desirable. However, being deprived of male voices early in life does appear to affect the females’ nesting behaviour, with the females that had been deprived of male song as youngsters spending less time on their nests toward the end of the 2 week bonding period, suggesting that the lack of male song early in life may possibly have delayed breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207