Advances in poultry nutrition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Table of ContentsPart 1 Physiology of feed intake 1.Nutrient requirements of broilers: an overview of factors affecting feed formulation: Gonzalo G. Mateos, Guillermo Talegón, Lewis Aguirre, Nereida L. Corrales, and Rosa Lázaro, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; 2.Advances in understanding poultry digestive anatomy and physiology: Birger Svihus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway; 3.Digestive kinetics of feedstuffs in broiler chickens: Sonia Yun Liu, Shemil P. Macelline and Peter H. Selle, The University of Sydney, Australia; 4.Advances in understanding poultry feed intake regulation: Jalila S. Dridi, Université d'Orléans, France; and Sami Dridi, University of Arkansas, USA; 5.Advances in understanding the cellular basis of feed efficiency in poultry muscle: Walter Bottje and Kentu Lassiter, University of Arkansas, USA; 6.Genetic factors affecting feed efficiency in meat-type chickens: Samuel E. Aggrey and Romdhane Rekaya, University of Georgia, USA; Part 2 Feed formulation 7.Maintaining the safety of poultry feed: G. Raj Murugesan, dsm-firmenich Nutritional Products, Switzerland; and Chasity M. Pender, dsm-firmenich Nutritional Products NA, USA; 8.Poultry feedstuff management and feed formulation utilizing big data: Bob Brill, Brilliant Alternatives Inc., USA; Matthew Clark, FeedGuys Resources Pte Ltd., Malaysia; and Dr Mirza Meghji, Salama Systems Inc., USA; 9.Advances in broiler breeder nutrition: Rick van Emous, Wageningen University, The Netherlands; Part 3 Individual nutrients/additives 10.Advances in understanding and improving the use of amino acids in poultry nutrition: M. T. Kidd, University of Arkansas, USA; S. Y. Liu and P. Selle, The University of Sydney, Australia; 11.Advances in understanding and improving the use of enzymes in broiler nutrition: Tanner L. Wise, Jung Yeol Sung, and Olayiwola Adeola, Purdue University, USA; 12.Advances in understanding and improving the use of macro-minerals in poultry nutrition: the example of phosphorus: A. Narcy , BOA-INRAE-Université France; F. Hervo, BOA-INRAEUniversité de Tours, France and Université Laval, Canada; C. R. Angel, University of Maryland, USA; A. Bonadiman, Université Laval, Canada; M. Duclos, B. Méda and S. Mignon-Grasteau, BOA-INRAE-Université de Tours, France; M. Reis, Trouw Nutrition R&D – El Viso de San Juan, Spain; and M. P. Létourneau-Montminy, Université Laval, Canada; 13.The use of probiotics and prebiotics to improve gut function and immunity in poultry: unlocking the secrets of avian wellness: Guillermo Tellez-Isaias , University of Arkansas, USA; Daniel Hernandez-Patlan and Bruno Solis-Cruz, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico; Saeed El-Ashram, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt; and Ebtsam Al-Olayan, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia; Part 4 Novel feed sources 14.Emerging protein sources for poultry feed: Archibold G. Bakare, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands; Taiye Olugbemi, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Mohammed M. Ari, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria; and Paul A. Iji, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands and University of New England, Australia; 15.The use of phytogenics in optimizing gut function and health in poultry: Konstantinos C. Mountzouris and Ioannis Brouklogiannis, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece; 16.Using macroalgae/seaweed and microalgae in poultry feed: Elisabeth Baéza and Cécile Berri, INRAE Nouzilly, France; and Edouard Coudert, Roullier, France; 17.Advances in synthetic biology to improve poultry production: Emile Fierro-Morel, Annika Kirsten Madler, Xin Gen Lei, Cornell University, USA; 18.High protein corn fermentation products for poultry derived from corn ethanol production: Peter E.V. Williams, FluidQuipTechnologies, USA; About the Editor(s)Dr Todd Applegate is Head of Department and R. Harold and Patsy Harrison Professor of Poultry Science at the University of Georgia, USA. He is a Fellow and former President of the Poultry Science Association (PSA). Amongst other honours, he is a recipient of the PSA’s Evonik Degussa Award for Achievement in Poultry Science. Professor Applegate has edited two previous books for Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Achieving sustainable production of poultry meat Volume 2: Breeding and nutrition and Achieving sustainable production of poultry meat Volume 3: Health and welfare, both published in 2017.What others are saying about this book....“Poultry consumption has increased over the last several years and this trend is expected to continue with the increasing population. With this in mind, the authors of this book have done an excellent job of reviewing current practices in poultry nutrition, evaluating new trends, and discussing how these new trends will impact the poultry industry in the future to meet the increasing demand for poultry meat and eggs. Researchers and nutritionists will find very useful information regarding a variety of topics related to current and future trends in poultry nutrition. Additionally, this book may also be used as supplementary material for poultry science courses.” (Book Review Published in the Journal of Applied Poultry Research)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».