Bibliographic record
Abstract
Table of ContentsPart 1 Physiology of feed intake 1.Nutrient requirements of broilers: an overview of factors affecting feed formulation: Gonzalo G. Mateos, Guillermo Talegón, Lewis Aguirre, Nereida L. Corrales, and Rosa Lázaro, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; 2.Advances in understanding poultry digestive anatomy and physiology: Birger Svihus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway; 3.Digestive kinetics of feedstuffs in broiler chickens: Sonia Yun Liu, Shemil P. Macelline and Peter H. Selle, The University of Sydney, Australia; 4.Advances in understanding poultry feed intake regulation: Jalila S. Dridi, Université d'Orléans, France; and Sami Dridi, University of Arkansas, USA; 5.Advances in understanding the cellular basis of feed efficiency in poultry muscle: Walter Bottje and Kentu Lassiter, University of Arkansas, USA; 6.Genetic factors affecting feed efficiency in meat-type chickens: Samuel E. Aggrey and Romdhane Rekaya, University of Georgia, USA; Part 2 Feed formulation 7.Maintaining the safety of poultry feed: G. Raj Murugesan, dsm-firmenich Nutritional Products, Switzerland; and Chasity M. Pender, dsm-firmenich Nutritional Products NA, USA; 8.Poultry feedstuff management and feed formulation utilizing big data: Bob Brill, Brilliant Alternatives Inc., USA; Matthew Clark, FeedGuys Resources Pte Ltd., Malaysia; and Dr Mirza Meghji, Salama Systems Inc., USA; 9.Advances in broiler breeder nutrition: Rick van Emous, Wageningen University, The Netherlands; Part 3 Individual nutrients/additives 10.Advances in understanding and improving the use of amino acids in poultry nutrition: M. T. Kidd, University of Arkansas, USA; S. Y. Liu and P. Selle, The University of Sydney, Australia; 11.Advances in understanding and improving the use of enzymes in broiler nutrition: Tanner L. Wise, Jung Yeol Sung, and Olayiwola Adeola, Purdue University, USA; 12.Advances in understanding and improving the use of macro-minerals in poultry nutrition: the example of phosphorus: A. Narcy , BOA-INRAE-Université France; F. Hervo, BOA-INRAEUniversité de Tours, France and Université Laval, Canada; C. R. Angel, University of Maryland, USA; A. Bonadiman, Université Laval, Canada; M. Duclos, B. Méda and S. Mignon-Grasteau, BOA-INRAE-Université de Tours, France; M. Reis, Trouw Nutrition R&D – El Viso de San Juan, Spain; and M. P. Létourneau-Montminy, Université Laval, Canada; 13.The use of probiotics and prebiotics to improve gut function and immunity in poultry: unlocking the secrets of avian wellness: Guillermo Tellez-Isaias , University of Arkansas, USA; Daniel Hernandez-Patlan and Bruno Solis-Cruz, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico; Saeed El-Ashram, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt; and Ebtsam Al-Olayan, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia; Part 4 Novel feed sources 14.Emerging protein sources for poultry feed: Archibold G. Bakare, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands; Taiye Olugbemi, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Mohammed M. Ari, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria; and Paul A. Iji, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands and University of New England, Australia; 15.The use of phytogenics in optimizing gut function and health in poultry: Konstantinos C. Mountzouris and Ioannis Brouklogiannis, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece; 16.Using macroalgae/seaweed and microalgae in poultry feed: Elisabeth Baéza and Cécile Berri, INRAE Nouzilly, France; and Edouard Coudert, Roullier, France; 17.Advances in synthetic biology to improve poultry production: Emile Fierro-Morel, Annika Kirsten Madler, Xin Gen Lei, Cornell University, USA; 18.High protein corn fermentation products for poultry derived from corn ethanol production: Peter E.V. Williams, FluidQuipTechnologies, USA; About the Editor(s)Dr Todd Applegate is Head of Department and R. Harold and Patsy Harrison Professor of Poultry Science at the University of Georgia, USA. He is a Fellow and former President of the Poultry Science Association (PSA). Amongst other honours, he is a recipient of the PSA’s Evonik Degussa Award for Achievement in Poultry Science. Professor Applegate has edited two previous books for Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Achieving sustainable production of poultry meat Volume 2: Breeding and nutrition and Achieving sustainable production of poultry meat Volume 3: Health and welfare, both published in 2017.What others are saying about this book....“Poultry consumption has increased over the last several years and this trend is expected to continue with the increasing population. With this in mind, the authors of this book have done an excellent job of reviewing current practices in poultry nutrition, evaluating new trends, and discussing how these new trends will impact the poultry industry in the future to meet the increasing demand for poultry meat and eggs. Researchers and nutritionists will find very useful information regarding a variety of topics related to current and future trends in poultry nutrition. Additionally, this book may also be used as supplementary material for poultry science courses.” (Book Review Published in the Journal of Applied Poultry Research)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".