MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402734347 · doi:10.36950/2024.4ciss059

Secondary school randomized controlled interventions with a minimum dual approach to health and the links to BMI in pupils: A systematic review and meta-analysis within the project From Science 2 School

2024· review· en· W4402734347 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Derrick R. Tanous, Gerhard Ruedl, Mohamad Motevalli, Katharina Wirnitzer

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS) · 2024
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeta-analysisPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialMedical educationDual (grammatical number)PsychologyMedicineMathematics educationNursingSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction & Purpose Health behavior offers a pivotal domain of health for managing current global crises, including physical inactivity and overweight/obesity (Schroeder, 2007). However, adults have limited capacity for adopting healthy behavior into their lifestyle (Prochaska & Velicer, 1997). Schools offer an ideal setting for implementing health interventions considering the breadth of children that can be reached and the amount of time children spend in school (Tanous et al., 2022). The present study hypothesized that appropriately planned physical activity (PA) intervention for pupils and during compulsory secondary school time results in healthier body weight management. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a published protocol (Tanous et al., 2022), and a trial registration was completed on the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPEO: CRD4202347770). The databases searched (12/2021) included PubMed, Education Source, and EMBASE. Only school-based randomized controlled trial interventions on PA and/or diet published in English or German were included. The study population included pupils (10-19 years of age) enrolled in secondary schools and without major nutritional deficit or unstable health condition. The study sample was refined using exclusion criteria: (i) no outcome on body weight, body mass index (BMI), or self-reported, (ii) intervention groups only targeting overweight and/or obese pupils, (iii) interventions outside of regular school hours or implemented beyond the school setting, (iv) total intervention duration less than eight weeks, (v) branches of schools specializing on physical exercise/sports in general, and (vi) no control group. Title/abstract and full-text screening, data appraisal, and summary data extraction were completed by two reviewers. Results A total of 5,945 articles were identified by the search process, including 23 studies and 9,441 pupils (of which 4,787 males and 4,654 females) eligible for the analysis. PA interventions ranged from eight weeks to eight months and included jumping (n = 2), strength exercises (n = 3), cardiovascular endurance (n = 4), or a combination (n = 2). For PA intervention implemented in the secondary level school setting for at least eight weeks duration, a random effect size of -0.12 units (95% CI [-0.26. 0.02]) of BMI (kg/m2) was found with low statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 0%; p = 0.60). Discussion Due to the behavioral constraints of the school setting, children are denied from achieving the minimum level of health protection, which adversely contributes to the poor global health status with a major impact. Previous meta-analyses identified a small PA intervention effect for improving BMI in pupils (-0.02 kg/m2 and -0.05 kg/m2; Guerra et al., 2013; Harris et al., 2009) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 77% and 54%, respectively). The findings of the present investigation revealed a more precise effect measure than previous meta-analyses (Guerra et al., 2013; Harris et al., 2009) regarding the exclusive power of the secondary school setting over PA levels and the BMI health improvement possibility for pupils (-0.12 kg/m2). Conclusion PA intervention in secondary schools contributes to limited, yet beneficial body weight management for pupils in the ongoing global health crisis (Schroeder, 2007; Tanous et al., 2022). Considering the lack of formal organization at homes, schools are urged to achieve 60 minutes of PA daily. References Guerra, P. H., Nobre, M. R. C., Da Silveira, J. A. C., & Taddei, J. A. d. A. C. (2013). The effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clinics, 68(9), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(09)14 Harris, K. C., Kuramoto, L. K., Schulzer, M., & Retallack, J. E. (2009). Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: A meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(7), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080966 Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 Schroeder, S. A. (2007). Shattuck lecture. We can do better – Improving the health of the American people. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(12), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa073350 Tanous, D. R., Ruedl, G., Kirschner, W., Drenowatz, C., Craddock, J., Rosemann, T., & Wirnitzer, K. (2022). School health programs of physical education and/or diet among pupils of primary and secondary school levels I and II linked to body mass index: A systematic review protocol within the project From Science 2 School. PLoS ONE, 17(10), Article e0275012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275012

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,024
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0240,044
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0270,043
Bibliométrie0,0070,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,192
Tête enseignante GPT0,528
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS)Même sujetHealth and Lifestyle StudiesTravaux en français237 207