MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402734347 · doi:10.36950/2024.4ciss059

Secondary school randomized controlled interventions with a minimum dual approach to health and the links to BMI in pupils: A systematic review and meta-analysis within the project From Science 2 School

2024· review· en· W4402734347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Derrick R. Tanous, Gerhard Ruedl, Mohamad Motevalli, Katharina Wirnitzer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS) · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialMedical educationDual (grammatical number)PsychologyMedicineMathematics educationNursingSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction & Purpose Health behavior offers a pivotal domain of health for managing current global crises, including physical inactivity and overweight/obesity (Schroeder, 2007). However, adults have limited capacity for adopting healthy behavior into their lifestyle (Prochaska & Velicer, 1997). Schools offer an ideal setting for implementing health interventions considering the breadth of children that can be reached and the amount of time children spend in school (Tanous et al., 2022). The present study hypothesized that appropriately planned physical activity (PA) intervention for pupils and during compulsory secondary school time results in healthier body weight management. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a published protocol (Tanous et al., 2022), and a trial registration was completed on the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPEO: CRD4202347770). The databases searched (12/2021) included PubMed, Education Source, and EMBASE. Only school-based randomized controlled trial interventions on PA and/or diet published in English or German were included. The study population included pupils (10-19 years of age) enrolled in secondary schools and without major nutritional deficit or unstable health condition. The study sample was refined using exclusion criteria: (i) no outcome on body weight, body mass index (BMI), or self-reported, (ii) intervention groups only targeting overweight and/or obese pupils, (iii) interventions outside of regular school hours or implemented beyond the school setting, (iv) total intervention duration less than eight weeks, (v) branches of schools specializing on physical exercise/sports in general, and (vi) no control group. Title/abstract and full-text screening, data appraisal, and summary data extraction were completed by two reviewers. Results A total of 5,945 articles were identified by the search process, including 23 studies and 9,441 pupils (of which 4,787 males and 4,654 females) eligible for the analysis. PA interventions ranged from eight weeks to eight months and included jumping (n = 2), strength exercises (n = 3), cardiovascular endurance (n = 4), or a combination (n = 2). For PA intervention implemented in the secondary level school setting for at least eight weeks duration, a random effect size of -0.12 units (95% CI [-0.26. 0.02]) of BMI (kg/m2) was found with low statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 0%; p = 0.60). Discussion Due to the behavioral constraints of the school setting, children are denied from achieving the minimum level of health protection, which adversely contributes to the poor global health status with a major impact. Previous meta-analyses identified a small PA intervention effect for improving BMI in pupils (-0.02 kg/m2 and -0.05 kg/m2; Guerra et al., 2013; Harris et al., 2009) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 77% and 54%, respectively). The findings of the present investigation revealed a more precise effect measure than previous meta-analyses (Guerra et al., 2013; Harris et al., 2009) regarding the exclusive power of the secondary school setting over PA levels and the BMI health improvement possibility for pupils (-0.12 kg/m2). Conclusion PA intervention in secondary schools contributes to limited, yet beneficial body weight management for pupils in the ongoing global health crisis (Schroeder, 2007; Tanous et al., 2022). Considering the lack of formal organization at homes, schools are urged to achieve 60 minutes of PA daily. References Guerra, P. H., Nobre, M. R. C., Da Silveira, J. A. C., & Taddei, J. A. d. A. C. (2013). The effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clinics, 68(9), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(09)14 Harris, K. C., Kuramoto, L. K., Schulzer, M., & Retallack, J. E. (2009). Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: A meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(7), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080966 Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 Schroeder, S. A. (2007). Shattuck lecture. We can do better – Improving the health of the American people. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(12), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa073350 Tanous, D. R., Ruedl, G., Kirschner, W., Drenowatz, C., Craddock, J., Rosemann, T., & Wirnitzer, K. (2022). School health programs of physical education and/or diet among pupils of primary and secondary school levels I and II linked to body mass index: A systematic review protocol within the project From Science 2 School. PLoS ONE, 17(10), Article e0275012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0270.043
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.528
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS)Same topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207