Erving Polster in the (International) Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 1997, I was the president of the Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (AAGT), later renamed to International Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (IAAGT). I was a nervous wreck as I waited for the end of a conference dinner and reception to give my presidential speech. What could I possibly say to this crowd consisting of my mentors and my gurus? I swallowed hard and decided to look my audience in the eye. I remember looking at Joseph Zinker, Elaine Kepner, Richard Kitzler, Robert Resnick, Gary Yontef, and many, many others whom I strove to emulate. These were the famous Gestalt therapists I had hoped to rub elbows with when I joined the conferences initially sponsored by the Gestalt Journal1 and later IAAGT. I had arrived, and in that very moment I found myself inarticulate.I continued to scan the room, and I came to Miriam’s Polster’s face. She looked loving and kind. Next to her was Erving Polster. He looked formidable to me. Big bushy eyebrows, and a gaze that really saw me. He was inviting, warm, and formidable all at the same time. In this very moment, I recognized it was not Erv that I was afraid of; it was me. I blurted out to the audience, “I don’t know why I’m looking at you; I know I’ll find what I need to say in me.” Erv smiled, and I settled into myself. What I am perfectly clear about is that Erving Polster was a lovely and brilliant man, dedicated to his craft and contacts. I was lucky to get to know Erv.Erving Polster was a rock and a founding member of AAGT. Those early days were highly contentious, and community meetings often followed a process of wrestling the microphone from one angry person to another. Our individuation from the Gestalt Journal was both critical and extremely difficult. Through it all, there was lots of polarization. If anyone in the organization stood for middle ground, it was Erving Polster. Both he and Miriam Polster were honored with AAGT’s Lifetime Achievement Award at the 1999 AAGT Conference in New York. Erv received a second, unprecedented lifetime achievement award in Vancouver at the 2006 AAGT Conference, where he was also the keynote speaker. Erving Polster is the only one to have received two lifetime achievement awards. He deserved them both.Needless to say, his warmth and brilliance will be missed, and I for one will be grateful for the balance, reason, and passion he brought to IAAGT.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».