MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Erving Polster in the (International) Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy

2024· article· en· W4402876726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGestalt Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestalt therapyAssociation (psychology)Gestalt psychologyPsychologyPsychotherapistNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1997, I was the president of the Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (AAGT), later renamed to International Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (IAAGT). I was a nervous wreck as I waited for the end of a conference dinner and reception to give my presidential speech. What could I possibly say to this crowd consisting of my mentors and my gurus? I swallowed hard and decided to look my audience in the eye. I remember looking at Joseph Zinker, Elaine Kepner, Richard Kitzler, Robert Resnick, Gary Yontef, and many, many others whom I strove to emulate. These were the famous Gestalt therapists I had hoped to rub elbows with when I joined the conferences initially sponsored by the Gestalt Journal1 and later IAAGT. I had arrived, and in that very moment I found myself inarticulate.I continued to scan the room, and I came to Miriam’s Polster’s face. She looked loving and kind. Next to her was Erving Polster. He looked formidable to me. Big bushy eyebrows, and a gaze that really saw me. He was inviting, warm, and formidable all at the same time. In this very moment, I recognized it was not Erv that I was afraid of; it was me. I blurted out to the audience, “I don’t know why I’m looking at you; I know I’ll find what I need to say in me.” Erv smiled, and I settled into myself. What I am perfectly clear about is that Erving Polster was a lovely and brilliant man, dedicated to his craft and contacts. I was lucky to get to know Erv.Erving Polster was a rock and a founding member of AAGT. Those early days were highly contentious, and community meetings often followed a process of wrestling the microphone from one angry person to another. Our individuation from the Gestalt Journal was both critical and extremely difficult. Through it all, there was lots of polarization. If anyone in the organization stood for middle ground, it was Erving Polster. Both he and Miriam Polster were honored with AAGT’s Lifetime Achievement Award at the 1999 AAGT Conference in New York. Erv received a second, unprecedented lifetime achievement award in Vancouver at the 2006 AAGT Conference, where he was also the keynote speaker. Erving Polster is the only one to have received two lifetime achievement awards. He deserved them both.Needless to say, his warmth and brilliance will be missed, and I for one will be grateful for the balance, reason, and passion he brought to IAAGT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it