MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402995727 · doi:10.47895/amp.v58i17.11680

UP-PGH Department of Dermatology: 100 Years of Skin Health Advocacy in the Service of the Filipino. Is there a place for the dermatologist in primary health care?

2024· editorial· en· W4402995727 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Christina Filomena R Batac

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Medica Philippina · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedicine and Dermatology Studies History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDermatologyFamily medicineReferralHealth carePolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Department of Dermatology of the University of the Philippines – Philippine General Hospital has celebrated its 100th year last 2022. Recognizing the importance of skin health, the Division of Dermatology was established in 1922, merely 12 years after the Philippine General Hospital was formally inaugurated and had opened its doors to the public. It is notable that among the researches of its first chief, Dr. Perpetuo Gutierrez, also considered The Father of Philippine Dermatology, were on yaws. Yaws, a bacterial skin infection caused by Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue, was considered as one of the most important public health problems in the Philippines in the mid-twentieth century. It was thought to have been eradicated in the Philippines since 1973, after a nationwide yaws eradication campaign was initiated in the 1950s. However, Dr. Belen Dofitas, chief of the Department’s Section of Neglected Tropical Diseases, had detected yaws cases in Mindanao in 2000, alerting the DOH that yaws is still endemic in certain populations. In fact, one of the goals of the 2024 DOH’s Multi-Disease Elimination Plan includes stopping the transmission of yaws. Then and now, UP-PGH Department of Dermatology has been blazing the trail towards skin care for all Filipinos. With the signing of the Universal Health Care (UHC) Bill into law, what is in store for dermatology in the Philippines? At present, patients with skin concerns are able to consult dermatologists directly, without any need for a referral from a primary care physician. With the UHC law, dermatologists being considered specialists may only be consulted by patients upon referral from the health system’s gatekeepers, the primary care physicians. Specialists may still be consulted directly but at a cost. This model is not new, and has been the set-up followed in developed countries such as the US, UK, and Canada. With the aim of providing quality health care, the goal is to move the health system’s focus from treatment to prevention. The vision is for every Filipino to have access to a primary care physician, as well as all preventive care and counsel near one’s residence. This goal will not be achieved overnight, and requires constant education in health literacy, not just for patients, but also for physicians and everyone in the health system. Primary care physicians will therefore be expected to provide high quality health care in all aspects. It is worthwhile to consider if this is truly feasible in this age of information explosion and therapeutic innovations. Will this path really lead to better patient care open to innovations, or just health insurance-directed care? This system has its pros and cons. There are anecdotal stories from countries following this system, of long waiting times before patients are seen by primary care physicians, and more so by specialists, including dermatologists. Dermatologists are trained to see any patient with any skin concern, from common dermatoses such as acne, tinea, impetigo, and pediculosis, to less common and relatively more complicated cases such as autoimmune bullous diseases and skin cancer. At the PGH Dermatology OPD clinic, the top ten diseases based on new patients in 2023 were 1) acne vulgaris, 2) psoriasis, 3) keloid, 4) atopic dermatitis, 5) irritant contact dermatitis, 6) melasma, 7) verruca vulgaris, 8) seborrheic dermatitis, 9) dermatosis papulose nigra, and 10) nummular dermatitis. The cumulative census of all residency training institutions of the Philippine Dermatological Society (PDS) last 2023 based on new cases reflects a similar trend: 1) acne vulgaris, 2) scabies, 3) dermatophytosis, 4) psoriasis, 5) seborrheic dermatitis, 6) atopic dermatitis, 7) allergic contact dermatitis, 8) verruca vulgaris, 9) irritant contact dermatitis, and 10) lichen simplex chronicus. These also make up the cases seen by most dermatologists engaged in private medical practice. Although these cases may be seen and managed with competence by primary care physicians, these are cases which dermatologists have been trained to manage, educate, and spend time providing counsel. The gatekeeper model will not be cost-effective if patients with skin conditions will ultimately be referred to dermatologists after being seen by primary care physicians. This model may be more appropriate for patients who have vague symptoms and do not know which physician to consult. However, patients with skin symptoms do have skin diseases and may choose to consult a dermatologist. As the Universal Health Care Law is still in the process of full implementation, it is timely to consider if it is better that dermatologists as well as other specialists that focus on certain organ systems such as ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, and orthopedic surgeons, be offered the option to be embedded in primary health care. This will allow patients to directly access their expertise, with shortened waiting times and be assured of quality care. This will also lessen the patient load of primary care physicians who will continue to see a variety of patients, allowing them to provide better health care to all their patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,632
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa Medica PhilippinaMême sujetMedicine and Dermatology Studies HistoryTravaux en français237 207