MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402995727 · doi:10.47895/amp.v58i17.11680

UP-PGH Department of Dermatology: 100 Years of Skin Health Advocacy in the Service of the Filipino. Is there a place for the dermatologist in primary health care?

2024· editorial· en· W4402995727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Christina Filomena R Batac

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Medica Philippina · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicine and Dermatology Studies History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyFamily medicineReferralHealth carePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Department of Dermatology of the University of the Philippines – Philippine General Hospital has celebrated its 100th year last 2022. Recognizing the importance of skin health, the Division of Dermatology was established in 1922, merely 12 years after the Philippine General Hospital was formally inaugurated and had opened its doors to the public. It is notable that among the researches of its first chief, Dr. Perpetuo Gutierrez, also considered The Father of Philippine Dermatology, were on yaws. Yaws, a bacterial skin infection caused by Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue, was considered as one of the most important public health problems in the Philippines in the mid-twentieth century. It was thought to have been eradicated in the Philippines since 1973, after a nationwide yaws eradication campaign was initiated in the 1950s. However, Dr. Belen Dofitas, chief of the Department’s Section of Neglected Tropical Diseases, had detected yaws cases in Mindanao in 2000, alerting the DOH that yaws is still endemic in certain populations. In fact, one of the goals of the 2024 DOH’s Multi-Disease Elimination Plan includes stopping the transmission of yaws. Then and now, UP-PGH Department of Dermatology has been blazing the trail towards skin care for all Filipinos. With the signing of the Universal Health Care (UHC) Bill into law, what is in store for dermatology in the Philippines? At present, patients with skin concerns are able to consult dermatologists directly, without any need for a referral from a primary care physician. With the UHC law, dermatologists being considered specialists may only be consulted by patients upon referral from the health system’s gatekeepers, the primary care physicians. Specialists may still be consulted directly but at a cost. This model is not new, and has been the set-up followed in developed countries such as the US, UK, and Canada. With the aim of providing quality health care, the goal is to move the health system’s focus from treatment to prevention. The vision is for every Filipino to have access to a primary care physician, as well as all preventive care and counsel near one’s residence. This goal will not be achieved overnight, and requires constant education in health literacy, not just for patients, but also for physicians and everyone in the health system. Primary care physicians will therefore be expected to provide high quality health care in all aspects. It is worthwhile to consider if this is truly feasible in this age of information explosion and therapeutic innovations. Will this path really lead to better patient care open to innovations, or just health insurance-directed care? This system has its pros and cons. There are anecdotal stories from countries following this system, of long waiting times before patients are seen by primary care physicians, and more so by specialists, including dermatologists. Dermatologists are trained to see any patient with any skin concern, from common dermatoses such as acne, tinea, impetigo, and pediculosis, to less common and relatively more complicated cases such as autoimmune bullous diseases and skin cancer. At the PGH Dermatology OPD clinic, the top ten diseases based on new patients in 2023 were 1) acne vulgaris, 2) psoriasis, 3) keloid, 4) atopic dermatitis, 5) irritant contact dermatitis, 6) melasma, 7) verruca vulgaris, 8) seborrheic dermatitis, 9) dermatosis papulose nigra, and 10) nummular dermatitis. The cumulative census of all residency training institutions of the Philippine Dermatological Society (PDS) last 2023 based on new cases reflects a similar trend: 1) acne vulgaris, 2) scabies, 3) dermatophytosis, 4) psoriasis, 5) seborrheic dermatitis, 6) atopic dermatitis, 7) allergic contact dermatitis, 8) verruca vulgaris, 9) irritant contact dermatitis, and 10) lichen simplex chronicus. These also make up the cases seen by most dermatologists engaged in private medical practice. Although these cases may be seen and managed with competence by primary care physicians, these are cases which dermatologists have been trained to manage, educate, and spend time providing counsel. The gatekeeper model will not be cost-effective if patients with skin conditions will ultimately be referred to dermatologists after being seen by primary care physicians. This model may be more appropriate for patients who have vague symptoms and do not know which physician to consult. However, patients with skin symptoms do have skin diseases and may choose to consult a dermatologist. As the Universal Health Care Law is still in the process of full implementation, it is timely to consider if it is better that dermatologists as well as other specialists that focus on certain organ systems such as ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, and orthopedic surgeons, be offered the option to be embedded in primary health care. This will allow patients to directly access their expertise, with shortened waiting times and be assured of quality care. This will also lessen the patient load of primary care physicians who will continue to see a variety of patients, allowing them to provide better health care to all their patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0060.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Medica PhilippinaSame topicMedicine and Dermatology Studies HistoryFrench-language works237,207