Efficacy of mirikizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in comparison to ustekinumab: Summary results from the double-blind Phase 3 VIVID-1 trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Mirikizumab (miri) is a selective IL23p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. The primary focus of the VIVID-1 trial (NCT03926130) was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of miri compared to placebo (PBO) with the secondary endpoints including the comparisons of miri to ustekinumab (uste). Objectives: We present the results of miri treatment compared to uste at Week 52 (W52) from the Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and PBO-controlled, treat-through (TT) VIVID-1 study. Methodology: Adult patients (pts) (N=1065) were randomised 6:3:2 to miri (N=579) 900mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) to W12, then 300mg subcutaneously (SC) Q4W to W52, uste (N=287) one ~6 mg/kg IV dose, then 90mg SC Q8W to W52 or PBO (N=199). At W12 PBO responders continued PBO to W52; PBO non-responders received the same blinded miri regimen described above. Multiplicity-controlled endpoints comparing miri vs uste were endoscopic response (ER) at W52 (superiority test), and clinical remission (CR) by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at W52 (non-inferiority test using 10% margin). Additional non-multiplicity-adjusted endpoints included endoscopic remission, corticosteroid-free (CSF) CR by CDAI, and the composite of CDAI CR and ER at W52. Pre-specified endpoint of change from baseline (CFB) in inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP) was assessed through W52. Outcome: Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups([ Table 1 ]). Miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for CR by CDAI, with numerically higher response rates for miri in bio-failed pts ([ Fig. 1a, b ]). Although superiority to uste in ER was not achieved, in bio-failed pts miri demonstrated a numerical trend towards greater response rates([ Fig. 1c, d ]). Rates of endoscopic remission and CSF-CDAI CR were not statistically different for miri vs uste. Miri had significantly greater rates compared to uste in achieving combined CDAI CR and ER at W52([ Fig. 2 ]). Miri had a nominal statistical difference to uste in decreasing FCP and CRP([ Fig. 3 ]). The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of miri([ Table 2 ]). Conclusion: In this phase 3 TT design study, miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI. In biologic failed pts miri had a numerical trend towards greater response compared to uste in clinical and endoscopic endpoints and an acceptable safety profile. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Table 1 Baseline demographics and disease characteristics. MIRI USTE PBO TOTAL N=579 N=287 N=199 N=1065 Age (years), mean (SD) 36∙0 (13∙2) 36∙6 (12∙7) 36∙3 (12∙7) 36∙2 (13∙0) Male, n (%) 332 (57∙3) 137 (47∙7) 118 (59∙3) 587 (55∙1) Weight (kg), mean (SD) 68∙02 (18∙3) 66∙86 (17∙6) 69∙55 (19∙0) 67∙99 (18∙3) BMI, mean (SD) 23∙2 (5∙4) 23∙3 (5∙5) 23∙8 (5∙8) 23∙4 (5∙5) Race, n (%) White 408 (71∙5) 201 (70∙3) 144 (74∙6) 753 (71∙7) Black or African American 10 (1∙8) 8 (2∙8) 5 (2∙6) 23 (2∙2) Asian 148 (25∙9) 74 (25∙9) 42 (21∙8) 264 (25∙1) Other 2 (0∙4) 2 (0∙7) 2 (1∙0) 6 (0∙6) Multiple 3 (0∙5) 1 (0∙3) 0 (0∙0) 4 (0∙4) Geographic region, n (%) Europe and Rest of World 319 (55∙1) 155 (54∙0) 117 (58∙8) 591 (55∙5) North America 77 (13∙3) 37 (12∙9) 27 (13∙6) 141 (13∙2) Central America or South America 30 (5∙2) 20 (7∙0) 9 (4∙5) 59 (5∙5) Asia 153 (26∙4) 75 (26∙1) 46 (23∙1) 274 (25∙7) Duration of Crohn’s disease (years), mean (SD) 7∙4 (8∙2) 7∙2 (7∙7) 7∙8 (7∙4) 7∙4 (7∙9) History of surgical bowel resection (yes), n (%) 89 (15.4) 29 (10.1) 33 (16.6) 151 (14.2) Disease location, n (%) Ileum only 65 (11∙2) 29 (10∙1) 19 (9∙5) 113 (10∙6) Colon only 225 (38∙9) 120 (41∙8) 77 (38∙7) 422 (39∙6) Ileum and colon 289 (49∙9) 138 (48∙1) 103 (51∙8) 530 (49∙8) Baseline CDAI, mean (SD) 323∙1 (85∙8) 318∙5 (93∙2) 318∙9 (86∙2) 321∙1 (87∙9) SF daily average, mean (SD) 5∙7 (3∙0) 5∙7 (2∙9) 5∙8 (3∙2) 5∙7 (3∙0) AP daily average, mean (SD) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) SES-CD Total Score, mean (SD) 13∙5 (6∙6) 13∙9 (6∙6) 13∙1 (6∙0) 13∙5 (6∙5) CRP (mg/L), median (Q1, Q3) 8∙5 (2∙9, 25∙0) 8∙9 (3∙4, 24∙8) 7∙6 (2∙9, 18∙8) 8∙3 (3∙0, 23∙7) Faecal calprotectin (mg/kg), median (Q1, Q3) 1315∙0 (444∙0, 2676∙0) 1489∙0 (519∙0, 2814∙0) 1161∙0 (324∙0, 2170∙0) 1315∙0 (452∙0, 2610∙0) Corticosteroid use, n (%) 177 (30∙6) 90 (31∙4) 58 (29∙1) 325 (30∙5) Immunomodulator use, n (%) 146 (25∙2) 87 (30∙3) 58 (29∙1) 291 (27∙3) Prior biologic failure, n (%) 281 (48∙5) 139 (48∙4) 97 (48∙7) 517 (48∙5) Prior anti-TNF failure, n (%) 265 (45∙8) 133 (46∙3) 89 (44∙7) 487 (45∙7) Prior anti-integrin failure, n (%) 68 (11∙7) 31 (10∙8) 24 (12∙1) 123 (11∙5) Number of failed biologics, n (%) None 298 (51∙5) 148 (51∙6) 102 (51∙3) 548 (51∙5) 1 175 (30∙2) 91 (31∙7) 66 (33∙2) 332 (31∙2) ≥2 106 (18∙3) 48 (16∙7) 31 (15∙6) 185 (17∙4) Abbreviations: AP=abdominal pain score; BMI=body mass index; CD=Crohn’s disease; CDAI=Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CRP=C-reactive protein; MIRI=mirikizumab; N=number of participants in the analysis population; n=number of participants in the specified category; PBO=placebo; Q=interquartile range; SD=standard deviation; SES-CD=Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s disease; SF=stool frequency; TNF=tumour necrosis factor; USTE=ustekinumab. Table 2 Safety overview. Weeks 0 to 52 MIRI USTE PBO N=630, PYE=593∙6 N=309, PYE=293∙3 N=211, PYE=119∙5 n (%) [EAIR] n (%) [EAIR] n (%) [EAIR] Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) 495 (78∙6) [201∙9] 239 (77∙3) [180∙4] 154 (73∙0) [291∙8] Common TEAEs a COVID-19 104 (16∙5) [19∙3] 47 (15∙2) [17∙3] 29 (13∙7) [26∙4] Anaemia 42 (6∙7) [7∙4] 15 (4∙9) [5∙3] 14 (6∙6) [12∙2] Arthralgia 41 (6∙5) [7∙2] 8 (2∙6) [2∙8] 11 (5∙2) [9∙6] Headache 41 (6∙5) [7∙2] 15 (4∙9) [5∙3] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] Upper respiratory tract infection 38 (6∙0) [6∙7] 22 (7∙1) [7∙8] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] Nasopharyngitis 36 (5∙7) [6∙3] 19 (6∙1) [6∙7] 9 (4∙3) [7∙7] Serious infection 14 (2∙2) [2∙4] 9 (2∙9) [3∙1] 6 (2∙8) [5∙1] Opportunistic infection 7 (1∙1) [1∙2] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] Adjudicated cerebro-cardiovascular events 3 (0∙5) [0∙5] 2 (0∙6) [0∙7] 2 (0∙9) [1∙7] Female 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Cancer 2 (0∙3) [0∙3] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 1 (0∙2) [0∙2] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Malignancies excluding NMSC 1 (0∙2) [0∙2] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] Hepatic laboratory b 39 (6∙2) [6∙8] 8 (2∙6) [2∙8] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] ALT ≥3× ULN 12 (1∙9) 6 (2∙0) 0 (0∙0) ≥5× ULN 3 (0∙5) 1 (0∙3) 0 (0∙0) AST ≥3× ULN 9 (1∙4) 7 (2∙3) 2 (1∙0) ≥5× ULN 2 (0∙3) 4 (1∙3) 0 (0∙0) ALT/ AST ≥3× ULN and TB ≥2× ULN 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) 1 (0∙2) ALP ≥2× ULN and Bilirubin ≥2× ULN 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) ALP ≥2× ULN 7 (1∙1) 0 (0∙0) 2 (1∙0) Serious adverse events (SAE) 65 (10∙3) [11∙5] 33 (10∙7) [11∙8] 36 (17∙1) [32∙5] Treatment discontinuation due to adverse event 32 (5∙1) [5∙4] 8 (2∙6) [2∙7] 20 (9∙5) [17∙1] Death c 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study drug; a: Events that occurred in at least 5% of the patients in any trial group. Events are listed according to decreasing frequency in the mirikizumab group.; b: No ALT or AST shifts ≥10× ULN were reported in the mirikizumab treatment or placebo groups. One participant (EAIR=0∙3 per 100 PYE) in the ustekinumab group reported ALT shifts ≥10× ULN. Two participants (EAIR=0∙7 per 100 PYE) in the ustekinumab group reported AST shifts ≥10× ULN.; c: A 35-year-old male patient who died due to pulmonary embolism, one additional 23-year-old male placebo non-responder patient who switched to mirikizumab after week 12 died due to worsening of CD, and a 63-year-old female patient who died due to sepsis.; Abbreviations: AE=adverse events; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate transferase; EAIR=exposure adjusted incidence rates; MIRI=mirikizumab; N=number of patients in the analysis population; n=number of patients in the specified category; PBO=placebo; PYE=patient years of exposure; SAE=serious adverse event; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event; TB=total bilirubin; ULN=upper limit of normal; USTE=ustekinumab. Publication History Article published online: 26 September 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».