MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403058047 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1789693

Efficacy of mirikizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in comparison to ustekinumab: Summary results from the double-blind Phase 3 VIVID-1 trial

2024· article· en· W4403058047 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Zeißig, Marc Ferrante, Vipul Jairath, Geert D’Haens, Walter Reinisch, F Rösemann, Sven Maier, Marijana Protić, Kam‐Lun Ellis Hon, Michelle Ugolini Lopes, Zhantao Lin, Nathan Morris, Britta Siegmund

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUstekinumabCrohn's diseaseDouble blindMedicineInternal medicinePhase (matter)DiseaseDermatologyPlaceboPathologyPhysicsAlternative medicineInfliximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mirikizumab (miri) is a selective IL23p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. The primary focus of the VIVID-1 trial (NCT03926130) was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of miri compared to placebo (PBO) with the secondary endpoints including the comparisons of miri to ustekinumab (uste). Objectives: We present the results of miri treatment compared to uste at Week 52 (W52) from the Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and PBO-controlled, treat-through (TT) VIVID-1 study. Methodology: Adult patients (pts) (N=1065) were randomised 6:3:2 to miri (N=579) 900mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) to W12, then 300mg subcutaneously (SC) Q4W to W52, uste (N=287) one ~6 mg/kg IV dose, then 90mg SC Q8W to W52 or PBO (N=199). At W12 PBO responders continued PBO to W52; PBO non-responders received the same blinded miri regimen described above. Multiplicity-controlled endpoints comparing miri vs uste were endoscopic response (ER) at W52 (superiority test), and clinical remission (CR) by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at W52 (non-inferiority test using 10% margin). Additional non-multiplicity-adjusted endpoints included endoscopic remission, corticosteroid-free (CSF) CR by CDAI, and the composite of CDAI CR and ER at W52. Pre-specified endpoint of change from baseline (CFB) in inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP) was assessed through W52. Outcome: Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups([ Table 1 ]). Miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for CR by CDAI, with numerically higher response rates for miri in bio-failed pts ([ Fig. 1a, b ]). Although superiority to uste in ER was not achieved, in bio-failed pts miri demonstrated a numerical trend towards greater response rates([ Fig. 1c, d ]). Rates of endoscopic remission and CSF-CDAI CR were not statistically different for miri vs uste. Miri had significantly greater rates compared to uste in achieving combined CDAI CR and ER at W52([ Fig. 2 ]). Miri had a nominal statistical difference to uste in decreasing FCP and CRP([ Fig. 3 ]). The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of miri([ Table 2 ]). Conclusion: In this phase 3 TT design study, miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI. In biologic failed pts miri had a numerical trend towards greater response compared to uste in clinical and endoscopic endpoints and an acceptable safety profile. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Table 1 Baseline demographics and disease characteristics. MIRI USTE PBO TOTAL N=579 N=287 N=199 N=1065 Age (years), mean (SD) 36∙0 (13∙2) 36∙6 (12∙7) 36∙3 (12∙7) 36∙2 (13∙0) Male, n (%) 332 (57∙3) 137 (47∙7) 118 (59∙3) 587 (55∙1) Weight (kg), mean (SD) 68∙02 (18∙3) 66∙86 (17∙6) 69∙55 (19∙0) 67∙99 (18∙3) BMI, mean (SD) 23∙2 (5∙4) 23∙3 (5∙5) 23∙8 (5∙8) 23∙4 (5∙5) Race, n (%) White 408 (71∙5) 201 (70∙3) 144 (74∙6) 753 (71∙7) Black or African American 10 (1∙8) 8 (2∙8) 5 (2∙6) 23 (2∙2) Asian 148 (25∙9) 74 (25∙9) 42 (21∙8) 264 (25∙1) Other 2 (0∙4) 2 (0∙7) 2 (1∙0) 6 (0∙6) Multiple 3 (0∙5) 1 (0∙3) 0 (0∙0) 4 (0∙4) Geographic region, n (%) Europe and Rest of World 319 (55∙1) 155 (54∙0) 117 (58∙8) 591 (55∙5) North America 77 (13∙3) 37 (12∙9) 27 (13∙6) 141 (13∙2) Central America or South America 30 (5∙2) 20 (7∙0) 9 (4∙5) 59 (5∙5) Asia 153 (26∙4) 75 (26∙1) 46 (23∙1) 274 (25∙7) Duration of Crohn’s disease (years), mean (SD) 7∙4 (8∙2) 7∙2 (7∙7) 7∙8 (7∙4) 7∙4 (7∙9) History of surgical bowel resection (yes), n (%) 89 (15.4) 29 (10.1) 33 (16.6) 151 (14.2) Disease location, n (%) Ileum only 65 (11∙2) 29 (10∙1) 19 (9∙5) 113 (10∙6) Colon only 225 (38∙9) 120 (41∙8) 77 (38∙7) 422 (39∙6) Ileum and colon 289 (49∙9) 138 (48∙1) 103 (51∙8) 530 (49∙8) Baseline CDAI, mean (SD) 323∙1 (85∙8) 318∙5 (93∙2) 318∙9 (86∙2) 321∙1 (87∙9) SF daily average, mean (SD) 5∙7 (3∙0) 5∙7 (2∙9) 5∙8 (3∙2) 5∙7 (3∙0) AP daily average, mean (SD) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) 2∙1 (0∙6) SES-CD Total Score, mean (SD) 13∙5 (6∙6) 13∙9 (6∙6) 13∙1 (6∙0) 13∙5 (6∙5) CRP (mg/L), median (Q1, Q3) 8∙5 (2∙9, 25∙0) 8∙9 (3∙4, 24∙8) 7∙6 (2∙9, 18∙8) 8∙3 (3∙0, 23∙7) Faecal calprotectin (mg/kg), median (Q1, Q3) 1315∙0 (444∙0, 2676∙0) 1489∙0 (519∙0, 2814∙0) 1161∙0 (324∙0, 2170∙0) 1315∙0 (452∙0, 2610∙0) Corticosteroid use, n (%) 177 (30∙6) 90 (31∙4) 58 (29∙1) 325 (30∙5) Immunomodulator use, n (%) 146 (25∙2) 87 (30∙3) 58 (29∙1) 291 (27∙3) Prior biologic failure, n (%) 281 (48∙5) 139 (48∙4) 97 (48∙7) 517 (48∙5) Prior anti-TNF failure, n (%) 265 (45∙8) 133 (46∙3) 89 (44∙7) 487 (45∙7) Prior anti-integrin failure, n (%) 68 (11∙7) 31 (10∙8) 24 (12∙1) 123 (11∙5) Number of failed biologics, n (%) None 298 (51∙5) 148 (51∙6) 102 (51∙3) 548 (51∙5) 1 175 (30∙2) 91 (31∙7) 66 (33∙2) 332 (31∙2) ≥2 106 (18∙3) 48 (16∙7) 31 (15∙6) 185 (17∙4) Abbreviations: AP=abdominal pain score; BMI=body mass index; CD=Crohn’s disease; CDAI=Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CRP=C-reactive protein; MIRI=mirikizumab; N=number of participants in the analysis population; n=number of participants in the specified category; PBO=placebo; Q=interquartile range; SD=standard deviation; SES-CD=Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s disease; SF=stool frequency; TNF=tumour necrosis factor; USTE=ustekinumab. Table 2 Safety overview. Weeks 0 to 52 MIRI USTE PBO N=630, PYE=593∙6 N=309, PYE=293∙3 N=211, PYE=119∙5 n (%) [EAIR] n (%) [EAIR] n (%) [EAIR] Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) 495 (78∙6) [201∙9] 239 (77∙3) [180∙4] 154 (73∙0) [291∙8] Common TEAEs a COVID-19 104 (16∙5) [19∙3] 47 (15∙2) [17∙3] 29 (13∙7) [26∙4] Anaemia 42 (6∙7) [7∙4] 15 (4∙9) [5∙3] 14 (6∙6) [12∙2] Arthralgia 41 (6∙5) [7∙2] 8 (2∙6) [2∙8] 11 (5∙2) [9∙6] Headache 41 (6∙5) [7∙2] 15 (4∙9) [5∙3] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] Upper respiratory tract infection 38 (6∙0) [6∙7] 22 (7∙1) [7∙8] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] Nasopharyngitis 36 (5∙7) [6∙3] 19 (6∙1) [6∙7] 9 (4∙3) [7∙7] Serious infection 14 (2∙2) [2∙4] 9 (2∙9) [3∙1] 6 (2∙8) [5∙1] Opportunistic infection 7 (1∙1) [1∙2] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] Adjudicated cerebro-cardiovascular events 3 (0∙5) [0∙5] 2 (0∙6) [0∙7] 2 (0∙9) [1∙7] Female 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Cancer 2 (0∙3) [0∙3] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 1 (0∙2) [0∙2] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Malignancies excluding NMSC 1 (0∙2) [0∙2] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] Hepatic laboratory b 39 (6∙2) [6∙8] 8 (2∙6) [2∙8] 9 (4∙3) [7∙8] ALT ≥3× ULN 12 (1∙9) 6 (2∙0) 0 (0∙0) ≥5× ULN 3 (0∙5) 1 (0∙3) 0 (0∙0) AST ≥3× ULN 9 (1∙4) 7 (2∙3) 2 (1∙0) ≥5× ULN 2 (0∙3) 4 (1∙3) 0 (0∙0) ALT/ AST ≥3× ULN and TB ≥2× ULN 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) 1 (0∙2) ALP ≥2× ULN and Bilirubin ≥2× ULN 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) 0 (0∙0) ALP ≥2× ULN 7 (1∙1) 0 (0∙0) 2 (1∙0) Serious adverse events (SAE) 65 (10∙3) [11∙5] 33 (10∙7) [11∙8] 36 (17∙1) [32∙5] Treatment discontinuation due to adverse event 32 (5∙1) [5∙4] 8 (2∙6) [2∙7] 20 (9∙5) [17∙1] Death c 0 (0∙0) [0∙0] 1 (0∙3) [0∙3] 1 (0∙5) [0∙8] Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study drug; a: Events that occurred in at least 5% of the patients in any trial group. Events are listed according to decreasing frequency in the mirikizumab group.; b: No ALT or AST shifts ≥10× ULN were reported in the mirikizumab treatment or placebo groups. One participant (EAIR=0∙3 per 100 PYE) in the ustekinumab group reported ALT shifts ≥10× ULN. Two participants (EAIR=0∙7 per 100 PYE) in the ustekinumab group reported AST shifts ≥10× ULN.; c: A 35-year-old male patient who died due to pulmonary embolism, one additional 23-year-old male placebo non-responder patient who switched to mirikizumab after week 12 died due to worsening of CD, and a 63-year-old female patient who died due to sepsis.; Abbreviations: AE=adverse events; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate transferase; EAIR=exposure adjusted incidence rates; MIRI=mirikizumab; N=number of patients in the analysis population; n=number of patients in the specified category; PBO=placebo; PYE=patient years of exposure; SAE=serious adverse event; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event; TB=total bilirubin; ULN=upper limit of normal; USTE=ustekinumab. Publication History Article published online: 26 September 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für GastroenterologieSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207