Temporal decreases in pathogen colonization and infection among hospitalized neonates following routine skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate: Botswana 2022 – 2023
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a major cause of sepsis among hospitalized neonates globally. Aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin antisepsis has been shown to be safe for use in infants; however, its sustained effectiveness in preventing Gram-negative pathogen colonization, bloodstream infection (BSI), and mortality is unclear. Methods: We conducted a period prevalence survey, with 26 sampling events over 12 months (18 October 2022 – 31 October 2023) at a 33-bed neonatal unit in a tertiary public hospital in Botswana where ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are leading causes of BSI. Perirectal and periumbilical skin swabs were collected every two weeks from all inpatients. Swabs were inoculated onto chromogenic media selective and differential for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and Acinetobacter spp. (CHROMagar™ ESBL, Acinetobacter). Colonization status was determined based on culture growth and colony morphology. Contemporaneous data on all-cause mortality and BSI were abstracted from routine surveillance records. Pre- and post-CHG prevalences were compared using a simple Chi-square test. During the surveillance period, an outbreak of K. pneumoniae linked to contaminated multi-use vials was detected, thus BSIs and deaths during the outbreak period (2 February–6 April, 2023) were excluded. In February 2023, the hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) team introduced twice-weekly whole-body cleansing with commercially available 2% aqueous CHG, performed by caregivers and healthcare workers on neonates >24 hours old and weighing ≥1 kg until discharge. Results: There were significant decreases in ESBL-E and Acinetobacter skin and perirectal colonization following the CHG intervention (Table 1; Figure 1). After the CHG intervention, the incidence of Acinetobacter BSIs declined significantly and there was a trend toward a decline in other BSIs and mortality. No adverse events associated with CHG were reported. Conclusions: Twice-weekly CHG application was temporally associated with significant reductions in neonatal ESBL-E and Actinetobacter skin and perirectal colonization and Acinetobacter BSI. This analysis was limited by a short pre-intervention surveillance period and thus may have been influenced by confounders such as seasonality, and intensified IPC efforts following the outbreak. Analysis of the routine CHG use in other settings and over longer surveillance periods are needed to better understand its effectiveness as an IPC strategy in settings where neonatal sepsis incidence is high. Table 1. Colonization prevalence, BSI incidence, and mortality surrounding introduction of CHG skin cleansing in a neonatal unit, 18 October 2022 – 31 October 2023.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».