Temporal decreases in pathogen colonization and infection among hospitalized neonates following routine skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate: Botswana 2022 – 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a major cause of sepsis among hospitalized neonates globally. Aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin antisepsis has been shown to be safe for use in infants; however, its sustained effectiveness in preventing Gram-negative pathogen colonization, bloodstream infection (BSI), and mortality is unclear. Methods: We conducted a period prevalence survey, with 26 sampling events over 12 months (18 October 2022 – 31 October 2023) at a 33-bed neonatal unit in a tertiary public hospital in Botswana where ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are leading causes of BSI. Perirectal and periumbilical skin swabs were collected every two weeks from all inpatients. Swabs were inoculated onto chromogenic media selective and differential for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and Acinetobacter spp. (CHROMagar™ ESBL, Acinetobacter). Colonization status was determined based on culture growth and colony morphology. Contemporaneous data on all-cause mortality and BSI were abstracted from routine surveillance records. Pre- and post-CHG prevalences were compared using a simple Chi-square test. During the surveillance period, an outbreak of K. pneumoniae linked to contaminated multi-use vials was detected, thus BSIs and deaths during the outbreak period (2 February–6 April, 2023) were excluded. In February 2023, the hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) team introduced twice-weekly whole-body cleansing with commercially available 2% aqueous CHG, performed by caregivers and healthcare workers on neonates >24 hours old and weighing ≥1 kg until discharge. Results: There were significant decreases in ESBL-E and Acinetobacter skin and perirectal colonization following the CHG intervention (Table 1; Figure 1). After the CHG intervention, the incidence of Acinetobacter BSIs declined significantly and there was a trend toward a decline in other BSIs and mortality. No adverse events associated with CHG were reported. Conclusions: Twice-weekly CHG application was temporally associated with significant reductions in neonatal ESBL-E and Actinetobacter skin and perirectal colonization and Acinetobacter BSI. This analysis was limited by a short pre-intervention surveillance period and thus may have been influenced by confounders such as seasonality, and intensified IPC efforts following the outbreak. Analysis of the routine CHG use in other settings and over longer surveillance periods are needed to better understand its effectiveness as an IPC strategy in settings where neonatal sepsis incidence is high. Table 1. Colonization prevalence, BSI incidence, and mortality surrounding introduction of CHG skin cleansing in a neonatal unit, 18 October 2022 – 31 October 2023.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".