Discordance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐low status between breast primary and distant metastases with clinical–pathological correlation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AIMS: Breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in-situ hybridisation (ISH) (HER2-low) can now be targeted by HER2 antibody drug conjugates. We set out to compare HER2 status between matched primary invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) and distant metastases (DM) with clinical-pathological correlation, with specific interest in HER2-low. METHODS: Biomarker studies and clinical-pathological features of primary IBC with matched DM diagnosed between 2021 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed. HER2 status was assessed per 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for IHC (4B5) and ISH (IQFISH pharmDX). Bilateral breast primaries were excluded. HER2 IHC 0 to 1+ were reassessed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven cases of primary IBC with matched DM were identified. Biomarkers were performed on core biopsy (n = 74) and resection (n = 73). One hundred and twenty-six (86%) were initially classified as 'HER2-negative'; of these, 67 (46%) were reclassified as HER2-low. Patients with HER2-positive primaries were younger (P = 0.01) and had an increased incidence of micropapillary carcinoma (P = 0.02). HER2-low primaries also had an increased incidence of micropapillary carcinoma (P = 0.02) and oestrogen receptor (ER) positivity (P = 0.02) compared to HER2 0. One hundred and sixty-nine matched DM cases excluding bone metastasis were identified (range = one to seven metastases per IBC). The most common sites of metastases were liver (50 of 169, 30%), lung (36 of 169; 21%), distant lymph node (26 of 169, 15%); 138 DM cases (82%) were previously classified as 'HER2-negative', and 62 (37%) were reclassified as HER2-low. Like HER2-low primaries, HER2-low metastases were frequently ER-positive (52 of 62; 84%) (P = 0.02). Brain metastases were more frequently HER2-positive (five of 32; 16%) (P = 0.04). Comparing HER2 status in matched primaries and DM, HER2 status was discordant in 62 cases (37%). Most changes occurred from HER2-low to HER2 0 (33 of 169, 20%), HER2 0 to HER2-low (17 of 169, 10%) and HER2-low to positive (10 of 169, 6%). All HER2-low to HER2 0 changes were HER2 1+ to 0. In 30 patients with multiple DM sites (47 cases), HER2 status among different DM samples was discordant in 16 patients (53%), mainly from HER2-low to HER2 0 (16 of 47, 34%). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of previous 'HER2-negative' primaries and DM cases were reclassified as HER2-low. Discordant HER2 status between IBC primary and metastasis and between different DM sites demonstrated tumour heterogeneity and highlights the need for HER2 retesting in distant metastasis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».