MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403487160 · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiae552

Bigger meristem, higher yield? The roles of REL2 and RELK in maize meristem function and yield enhancement

2024· article· en· W4403487160 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Janlo M Robil, Thu M Tran

Notice bibliographique

RevuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNeurosciences FoundationKillam TrustsNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésMeristemYield (engineering)BiologyFunction (biology)BotanyAgronomyCell biologyPhysicsShoot

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Plant development depends on the sustained yet controlled proliferation of stem cells in the meristem. The well-known CLAVATA-WUSCHEL (CLV-WUS) signaling pathway integrates various molecular and hormonal cues to maintain this balance, which determines the meristem size and organ formation. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of fine-tuning meristem size regulation to improve crop architecture and yields (Chen and Gallavotti 2021). For example, in maize, slightly enlarging the inflorescence meristem (IM) can increase the number of kernel rows, which is a critical yield trait (Je et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2021). Although the CLV-WUS signaling pathway is conserved across species, mutations in its orthologous regulators can produce different effects on meristem size, suggesting an evolutionary diversification in the control of the pathway (Wang and Jiao 2023). Therefore, targeting key regulators of meristem maintenance while overcoming genetic redundancy and pleiotropy remains a significant challenge. The CLV-WUS signaling pathway maintains stem cell balance through a negative feedback loop: WUS, which is expressed in the organizing center, stimulates stem cell proliferation in the central zone, where it also activates CLV3, which in turn represses the WUS expression (Kitagawa and Jackson 2019) (Fig. 1A). In maize, orthologs of the CLV-WUS genes interact with various signaling peptides to regulate stem cell fate and differentiation (Chen and Gallavotti 2021). Additionally, factors like hormones and redox environments influence the CLV-WUS pathway. In these interactions, transcriptional corepressors play pivotal roles because they link the repressive machinery to control of gene expression based on developmental or environmental signals (Leydon et al. 2021). The maize transcriptional corepressor RAMOSA1 ENHANCER LOCUS2 (REL2, a co-ortholog of TOPLESS in Arabidopsis) regulates development, but its exact functions in meristem maintenance are still poorly understood (Gallavotti et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2019). REL2/RELK corepressors influence meristem size by controlling meristem maintenance. A) A simplified model in which REL2/RELK corepressors regulate maize IM maintenance. B) Schematic comparison of maize inflorescences during early development depicting a wild type with a normal IM size, a rel2;relk1 double mutant with an enlarged IM, and a rel2;relk1;Zmwus1 triple mutant in which IM size is restored to near-normal size. In this issue of Plant Physiology, Gregory et al. (2024) provide a comprehensive characterization of the maize REL2 corepressor family and its roles in plant growth and development. Through detailed genetic analyses, they found that REL2 is partially redundant with 3 REL-LIKE genes (RELKs), exhibiting specific compensatory patterns throughout development. They found that REL2/RELKs act through the CLV-WUS pathway to control meristem size, independent of other known upstream regulators. Furthermore, the authors discovered that in addition to interacting with WUS proteins, REL2/RELKs influence meristem function by regulating hormone levels and maintaining redox balance within the meristem (Fig. 1A). Finally, through hybrid maize analysis, the authors demonstrated REL2 has the potential to significantly increase maize yield. Maize rel2 mutants display pleiotropic vegetative and reproductive phenotypes such as defective axillary meristem (AM) initiation and IM maintenance (Gallavotti et al. 2010). To identify the genetic modifiers of REL2, the authors performed an EMS mutagenesis screen for enhancers of rel2 phenotypes and found 2 mutants both exhibiting shorter plant stature and upright tassel branches. By positional mapping and whole genome sequencing, the authors identified that both mutants carry base changes in RELK1, a member of the REL2 family. About one-half of the double mutant plants failed to produce an ear, reminiscent of the rel2 phenotype. Additionally, the RELK1 gene was upregulated in rel2 mutants with broad expression in various tissues, suggesting a compensatory mechanism between REL2 and RELK1 during development. To further investigate REL2/RELK functions, the authors generated CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts of the remaining gene family members, RELK2 and RELK3, and generated higher-order mutants. Although relk2 and relk3 single and double mutants appear normal, rel2;relk2;relk3 triple mutants exhibit severe defects in vegetative development, including a shoot apical meristem that is not maintained through embryogenesis. These findings suggest that REL2/RELKs display genetic redundancy and subfunctionalization during maize development, with REL2 serving as the primary gene. The authors then examined the impact of REL2/RELK mutations on meristem size. rel2;relk1 double mutants show a significant increase in IM size, although the ears produced minimal seeds, suggesting that downstream developmental processes were also affected. Gene expression analysis in these mutants showed a misregulation of many genes involved in hormone balance, redox regulation, and meristem maintenance pathways. Notably, the findings suggest that the combined loss of REL2 and RELK1 causes broader disruptions in the stem cell regulatory network compared with the loss of REL2 alone, as additional WOX (WUSCHEL-like homeobox) gene homologs were misregulated in the double mutants. Interestingly, double and triple mutants of rel2 and relk1 with Zmwus1 exhibit a more normal-looking IM, indicating a correction of meristem size in the mutants (Fig. 1B). These findings support a critical role of REL2/RELK1 in repressing ZmWUS1 expression during IM maintenance. How do REL2/RELK corepressors regulate the CLV-WUS pathway in relation to other factors? The authors analyzed double and triple mutants of rel2 and relk1 in combination with mutations in 3 other known meristem regulators, which are associated with abnormally large and sometimes deformed IMs. The findings further support that the enlarged meristem in rel2;relk1 mutants is likely due to WUS overexpression and stem cell overproliferation, but the precise molecular mechanism underlying this regulation requires further investigation. In summary, REL2/RELK corepressors regulate meristem size by modulating the CLV-WUS pathway and maintaining hormone and redox balance (Fig. 1A), making them a promising target for improving maize yield. However, an overly large meristem could compromise organ development (Kitagawa and Jackson 2019). Thus, Gregory et al. (2024) investigated whether heterozygosity of rel2 could enlarge the IM just enough to increase the kernel row number without causing detrimental effects. In maize and other crops, F1 hybrids, produced by crossing two genetically distinct parent plants, are widely used for commercial seed production. Using diverse maize inbred lines grown in different environments, the authors produced F1 hybrids heterozygous for the rel2 mutation. They found that at least 40% of these hybrid lines significantly increased kernel row numbers. While further investigation is needed to fully assess the impact of rel2 heterozygosity on yield and plant performance, this study demonstrates how targeting a key regulator can modulate plant development and potentially enhance crop yields. Thu M. Tran is funded by a National Science Foundation grant IOS 2131631. Janlo M. Robil is funded by Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship. All data described in this article are available in the original publication by Gregory et al. (2024).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,974
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,196

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYMême sujetCrop Yield and Soil FertilityTravaux en français237 207