MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403487160 · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiae552

Bigger meristem, higher yield? The roles of REL2 and RELK in maize meristem function and yield enhancement

2024· article· en· W4403487160 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Janlo M Robil, Thu M Tran

Bibliographic record

VenuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNeurosciences FoundationKillam TrustsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMeristemYield (engineering)BiologyFunction (biology)BotanyAgronomyCell biologyPhysicsShoot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant development depends on the sustained yet controlled proliferation of stem cells in the meristem. The well-known CLAVATA-WUSCHEL (CLV-WUS) signaling pathway integrates various molecular and hormonal cues to maintain this balance, which determines the meristem size and organ formation. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of fine-tuning meristem size regulation to improve crop architecture and yields (Chen and Gallavotti 2021). For example, in maize, slightly enlarging the inflorescence meristem (IM) can increase the number of kernel rows, which is a critical yield trait (Je et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2021). Although the CLV-WUS signaling pathway is conserved across species, mutations in its orthologous regulators can produce different effects on meristem size, suggesting an evolutionary diversification in the control of the pathway (Wang and Jiao 2023). Therefore, targeting key regulators of meristem maintenance while overcoming genetic redundancy and pleiotropy remains a significant challenge. The CLV-WUS signaling pathway maintains stem cell balance through a negative feedback loop: WUS, which is expressed in the organizing center, stimulates stem cell proliferation in the central zone, where it also activates CLV3, which in turn represses the WUS expression (Kitagawa and Jackson 2019) (Fig. 1A). In maize, orthologs of the CLV-WUS genes interact with various signaling peptides to regulate stem cell fate and differentiation (Chen and Gallavotti 2021). Additionally, factors like hormones and redox environments influence the CLV-WUS pathway. In these interactions, transcriptional corepressors play pivotal roles because they link the repressive machinery to control of gene expression based on developmental or environmental signals (Leydon et al. 2021). The maize transcriptional corepressor RAMOSA1 ENHANCER LOCUS2 (REL2, a co-ortholog of TOPLESS in Arabidopsis) regulates development, but its exact functions in meristem maintenance are still poorly understood (Gallavotti et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2019). REL2/RELK corepressors influence meristem size by controlling meristem maintenance. A) A simplified model in which REL2/RELK corepressors regulate maize IM maintenance. B) Schematic comparison of maize inflorescences during early development depicting a wild type with a normal IM size, a rel2;relk1 double mutant with an enlarged IM, and a rel2;relk1;Zmwus1 triple mutant in which IM size is restored to near-normal size. In this issue of Plant Physiology, Gregory et al. (2024) provide a comprehensive characterization of the maize REL2 corepressor family and its roles in plant growth and development. Through detailed genetic analyses, they found that REL2 is partially redundant with 3 REL-LIKE genes (RELKs), exhibiting specific compensatory patterns throughout development. They found that REL2/RELKs act through the CLV-WUS pathway to control meristem size, independent of other known upstream regulators. Furthermore, the authors discovered that in addition to interacting with WUS proteins, REL2/RELKs influence meristem function by regulating hormone levels and maintaining redox balance within the meristem (Fig. 1A). Finally, through hybrid maize analysis, the authors demonstrated REL2 has the potential to significantly increase maize yield. Maize rel2 mutants display pleiotropic vegetative and reproductive phenotypes such as defective axillary meristem (AM) initiation and IM maintenance (Gallavotti et al. 2010). To identify the genetic modifiers of REL2, the authors performed an EMS mutagenesis screen for enhancers of rel2 phenotypes and found 2 mutants both exhibiting shorter plant stature and upright tassel branches. By positional mapping and whole genome sequencing, the authors identified that both mutants carry base changes in RELK1, a member of the REL2 family. About one-half of the double mutant plants failed to produce an ear, reminiscent of the rel2 phenotype. Additionally, the RELK1 gene was upregulated in rel2 mutants with broad expression in various tissues, suggesting a compensatory mechanism between REL2 and RELK1 during development. To further investigate REL2/RELK functions, the authors generated CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts of the remaining gene family members, RELK2 and RELK3, and generated higher-order mutants. Although relk2 and relk3 single and double mutants appear normal, rel2;relk2;relk3 triple mutants exhibit severe defects in vegetative development, including a shoot apical meristem that is not maintained through embryogenesis. These findings suggest that REL2/RELKs display genetic redundancy and subfunctionalization during maize development, with REL2 serving as the primary gene. The authors then examined the impact of REL2/RELK mutations on meristem size. rel2;relk1 double mutants show a significant increase in IM size, although the ears produced minimal seeds, suggesting that downstream developmental processes were also affected. Gene expression analysis in these mutants showed a misregulation of many genes involved in hormone balance, redox regulation, and meristem maintenance pathways. Notably, the findings suggest that the combined loss of REL2 and RELK1 causes broader disruptions in the stem cell regulatory network compared with the loss of REL2 alone, as additional WOX (WUSCHEL-like homeobox) gene homologs were misregulated in the double mutants. Interestingly, double and triple mutants of rel2 and relk1 with Zmwus1 exhibit a more normal-looking IM, indicating a correction of meristem size in the mutants (Fig. 1B). These findings support a critical role of REL2/RELK1 in repressing ZmWUS1 expression during IM maintenance. How do REL2/RELK corepressors regulate the CLV-WUS pathway in relation to other factors? The authors analyzed double and triple mutants of rel2 and relk1 in combination with mutations in 3 other known meristem regulators, which are associated with abnormally large and sometimes deformed IMs. The findings further support that the enlarged meristem in rel2;relk1 mutants is likely due to WUS overexpression and stem cell overproliferation, but the precise molecular mechanism underlying this regulation requires further investigation. In summary, REL2/RELK corepressors regulate meristem size by modulating the CLV-WUS pathway and maintaining hormone and redox balance (Fig. 1A), making them a promising target for improving maize yield. However, an overly large meristem could compromise organ development (Kitagawa and Jackson 2019). Thus, Gregory et al. (2024) investigated whether heterozygosity of rel2 could enlarge the IM just enough to increase the kernel row number without causing detrimental effects. In maize and other crops, F1 hybrids, produced by crossing two genetically distinct parent plants, are widely used for commercial seed production. Using diverse maize inbred lines grown in different environments, the authors produced F1 hybrids heterozygous for the rel2 mutation. They found that at least 40% of these hybrid lines significantly increased kernel row numbers. While further investigation is needed to fully assess the impact of rel2 heterozygosity on yield and plant performance, this study demonstrates how targeting a key regulator can modulate plant development and potentially enhance crop yields. Thu M. Tran is funded by a National Science Foundation grant IOS 2131631. Janlo M. Robil is funded by Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship. All data described in this article are available in the original publication by Gregory et al. (2024).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207