MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403722617 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0001035168.20882.09

S1450 Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 152 Weeks of Continuous Treatment: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study

2024· article· en· W4403722617 sur OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, Geert D’Haens, David B. Clemow, Peter Irvin, Jordan Johns, Theresa Hunter, María T. Abreu, Scott D. Lee, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Taku Kobayashi, Marla C. Dubinsky, Séverine Vermeire, Corey A. Siegel, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Richard Moses, Joe Milata, Vipin Arora, Axel Dignaß, Remo Panaccione

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineExtension (predicate logic)Term (time)Open labelSurgeryProgramming languageRandomized controlled trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Mirikizumab, a p19-directed interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, is efficacious in inducing clinical remission at Week(W) 12 and maintaining clinical remission through W52 and W104 in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) (LUCENT-1, LUCENT-2, LUCENT-3). Here we present efficacy and safety results through W152 of mirikizumab treatment from the open-label extension LUCENT-3 study. Methods: Clinical, symptomatic, quality-of-life, and adverse event outcomes are reported for mirikizumab induction responders, including biologic failed patients, who entered LUCENT-3, with data shown for W52 maintenance responders or remitters. Discontinuations or missing data were handled by non-responder imputation (NRI), modified NRI (mNRI), and observed case (OC). mNRI uses multiple imputation for missing data and balances bias of NRI and OC. Table provides endpoint and population definitions and abbreviations. Results: Using mNRI, among W52 miri responders, 82% demonstrated clinical response at W152. Remission rates at W152 for W52 clinical responders were: 56% clinical, 55% corticosteroid-free (CSF), 61% endoscopic, 53% histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR), 75% symptomatic, and 59% bowel urgency. Patients achieving histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) and bowel urgency clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) at W152 were 53% and 74%, respectively. For W52 miri remitters, 85% demonstrated clinical response at W152. Remission rates at W152 for W52 clinical remitters were: 70% clinical, 69% CSF, 72% endoscopic, 63% HEMR, 82% symptomatic, and 61% bowel urgency. Patients achieving HEMI and bowel urgency CMI at W152 were 64% and 76%, respectively. Biologic Failed/Non-failed subgroup data were generally similar (Table 1). Stool frequency, rectal bleeding, bowel urgency, and abdominal pain symptom score reductions from induction baseline at W52 were sustained through W152. Severe adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7.4% of patients, while 5.3% discontinued treatment due to an AE. AEs of special interest included: opportunistic infection (1.8%); cerebrocardiovascular events (1.5%); malignancy (0.3%). Elevated liver enzymes ≥3ULN included: ALT (0.9%); AST (1.2%); TBL (1.8%); none ≥5ULN. Conclusion: Symptomatic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and quality-of-life outcomes support the long-term sustained benefit of mirikizumab treatment up to 152 W in patients with UC, including biologic failed patients, with no new safety concerns. Table 1. - Efficacy and safety results through week 152 of mirikizumab treatment Endpoints atWeek 152 In Week 52 Responders1 n=285% All (95% CI3) In Week 52 Responders1 n=195% Not Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Responders1 n=91% Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=179% All (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=120% Not Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=59% Biologic Failed (95% CI3) Clinical Response4 71.6(66.1, 76.5) 76.4(70.0, 81.8) 60.4(50.2, 69.9) 72.6(65.7, 78.6) 79.2(71.1, 85.5) 59.3(46.6, 70.9) Clinical Remission5 49.5(43.7, 55.2) 52.3(45.3, 59.2) 42.9(33.2, 53.1) 60.3(53.0, 67.2) 65.8(57.0, 73.7) 49.2(36.8, 61.6) Symptomatic Remission6 CSF Remission7 66.3(60.6, 71.6) 48.1(42.3, 53.9) 71.3(64.6, 77.2) 50.8(43.8, 57.7) 54.9(44.7, 64.8)41.8(32.2, 52.0) 69.8(62.7, 76.1)59.2(51.9, 66.1) 75.8(67.4, 82.6)65.0(56.1, 72.9) 57.6(44.9, 69.4)47.5(35.3, 60.0) HEMR8 49.3 (43.6, 55.1) 51.3 (44.3, 58.2) 45.1 (35.2, 55.3) 59.2(51.9, 66.1) 63.3(54.4, 71.4) 50.8(38.4, 63.2) Endoscopic Remission9 59.1(53.3, 64.6) 59.5(52.5, 66.1) 58.2(48.0, 67.8) 69.8(62.7, 76.1) 73.3(64.8, 80.4) 62.7(50.0, 73.9) HEMI10 50.3(44.6, 56.1) 51.8(44.8, 58.7) 47.3(37.3, 57.4) 59.8(52.5, 66.7) 64.2(55.3, 72.2) 50.8(38.4, 63.2) Bowel Urgency Remission11 51.6(45.8, 57.3) 55.4(48.4, 62.2) 42.9(33.2, 53.1) 52.5(45.2, 59.7) 60.0(51.1, 68.3) 37.3(26.1, 50.0) Bowel Urgency CMI12 n=266 13 65.4(59.5, 70.9) n=180 13 69.4(62.4, 75.7) n=87 13 56.3(45.9, 66.3) n=169 13 63.9(56.4, 70.8) n=112 13 68.8(59.7, 76.6) n=57 13 54.4(41.6, 66.6) Abbreviations: AE=Adverse event; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate transaminase; CI=Confidence Interval; CMI= clinically meaningful improvement; CSF= corticosteroid-free; HEMI= histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement; HEMR=histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission ES=Endoscopic Subscore; mITT=Modified Intent-to-Treat; mRNI=modified NRI; NRI=Nonresponder Imputation; NRS = Numeric Rating Scale; OC = observed case; TBL=total bilirubin.Definitions: Biologic Failed: Inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerant to a biologic therapy or the Janus kinase inhibitors for UC. Cerebrocardiovascular events: atrial fibrillation (N=2), angina unstable (N=1), coronary arterial stent insertion (N=1), hypertensive crisis (N=1), ventricular tachycardia (N=1) – angina and stint were same patient. Not Biologic Failed: failed conventional treatments (i.e., immunomodulators/corticosteroids); may include some participants who were exposed to but did not fail biologic treatment. Malignancy: thyroid cancer metastatic (N=1). mNRI: patients who discontinue treatment treated as nonresponders and patients who are otherwise missing endpoint data imputed using multiple imputation. NRI: patients who discontinue treatment treated as nonresponders and patients who are otherwise missing endpoint data tagged as nonresponders. OC: patients who discontinue treatment or are otherwise missing data are excluded from analyses. Opportunistic infection: herpes zoster (N=4), candidiasis (N=3) – one patient had each.1Responders = (≥30% and 2-point decrease from baseline in the composite clinical endpoint of the sum of endoscopic (ES), stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB) subscores, and RB = 0 or 1, or ≥1 pt decrease from baseline).2Remitters = (Mayo Modified Score [MMS] SF = 0 or SF = 1 with ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline; RB = 0; ES = 0 or 1) cohort of LUCENT-2 at W52.3Response confidence intervals are constructed using Wilson method, without continuity correction.4Clinical response: ≥2-point and ≥30% decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0 or 1 or, RB ≥1-point decrease from baseline.5Clinical remission: SF=0 or SF=1 with ≥1-point decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0; and ES=0 or 1 (excluding friability).6Symptomatic remission: SF=0 or SF=1 with ≥1-point decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0.7Corticosteroid-free (CSF) remission: Defined as clinical remission, and no corticosteroid use for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 52; SF = 0, or SF = 1 with a ≥1-point decrease from induction baseline; RB = 0; ES = 0 or 1 (excluding friability).8Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission (HEMR): Endoscopic subscore=0 or 1 (excluding friability) + Geboes≤2.0.9Endoscopic remission: ES=0 or 1 (excluding friability); score ranges 0 to 4; a lower score indicates less mucosal damage.10Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI): Endoscopic subscore=0 or 1 (excluding friability) + Geboes≤3.1.11Bowel urgency remission: UNRS=0 or 1.12Bowel urgency Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI): Change from baseline in UNRS≥3 in patients with UNRS≥3 at induction baseline.13In patients who had BU NRS≥3 at induction baseline.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,302 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of GastroenterologyMême sujetColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesTravaux en français237 207