MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1450 Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 152 Weeks of Continuous Treatment: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study

2024· article· en· W4403722617 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, Geert D’Haens, David B. Clemow, Peter Irvin, Jordan Johns, Theresa Hunter, María T. Abreu, Scott D. Lee, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Taku Kobayashi, Marla C. Dubinsky, Séverine Vermeire, Corey A. Siegel, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Richard Moses, Joe Milata, Vipin Arora, Axel Dignaß, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtension (predicate logic)Term (time)Open labelSurgeryProgramming languageRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mirikizumab, a p19-directed interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, is efficacious in inducing clinical remission at Week(W) 12 and maintaining clinical remission through W52 and W104 in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) (LUCENT-1, LUCENT-2, LUCENT-3). Here we present efficacy and safety results through W152 of mirikizumab treatment from the open-label extension LUCENT-3 study. Methods: Clinical, symptomatic, quality-of-life, and adverse event outcomes are reported for mirikizumab induction responders, including biologic failed patients, who entered LUCENT-3, with data shown for W52 maintenance responders or remitters. Discontinuations or missing data were handled by non-responder imputation (NRI), modified NRI (mNRI), and observed case (OC). mNRI uses multiple imputation for missing data and balances bias of NRI and OC. Table provides endpoint and population definitions and abbreviations. Results: Using mNRI, among W52 miri responders, 82% demonstrated clinical response at W152. Remission rates at W152 for W52 clinical responders were: 56% clinical, 55% corticosteroid-free (CSF), 61% endoscopic, 53% histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR), 75% symptomatic, and 59% bowel urgency. Patients achieving histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) and bowel urgency clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) at W152 were 53% and 74%, respectively. For W52 miri remitters, 85% demonstrated clinical response at W152. Remission rates at W152 for W52 clinical remitters were: 70% clinical, 69% CSF, 72% endoscopic, 63% HEMR, 82% symptomatic, and 61% bowel urgency. Patients achieving HEMI and bowel urgency CMI at W152 were 64% and 76%, respectively. Biologic Failed/Non-failed subgroup data were generally similar (Table 1). Stool frequency, rectal bleeding, bowel urgency, and abdominal pain symptom score reductions from induction baseline at W52 were sustained through W152. Severe adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7.4% of patients, while 5.3% discontinued treatment due to an AE. AEs of special interest included: opportunistic infection (1.8%); cerebrocardiovascular events (1.5%); malignancy (0.3%). Elevated liver enzymes ≥3ULN included: ALT (0.9%); AST (1.2%); TBL (1.8%); none ≥5ULN. Conclusion: Symptomatic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and quality-of-life outcomes support the long-term sustained benefit of mirikizumab treatment up to 152 W in patients with UC, including biologic failed patients, with no new safety concerns. Table 1. - Efficacy and safety results through week 152 of mirikizumab treatment Endpoints atWeek 152 In Week 52 Responders1 n=285% All (95% CI3) In Week 52 Responders1 n=195% Not Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Responders1 n=91% Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=179% All (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=120% Not Biologic Failed (95% CI3) In Week 52 Remitters2 n=59% Biologic Failed (95% CI3) Clinical Response4 71.6(66.1, 76.5) 76.4(70.0, 81.8) 60.4(50.2, 69.9) 72.6(65.7, 78.6) 79.2(71.1, 85.5) 59.3(46.6, 70.9) Clinical Remission5 49.5(43.7, 55.2) 52.3(45.3, 59.2) 42.9(33.2, 53.1) 60.3(53.0, 67.2) 65.8(57.0, 73.7) 49.2(36.8, 61.6) Symptomatic Remission6 CSF Remission7 66.3(60.6, 71.6) 48.1(42.3, 53.9) 71.3(64.6, 77.2) 50.8(43.8, 57.7) 54.9(44.7, 64.8)41.8(32.2, 52.0) 69.8(62.7, 76.1)59.2(51.9, 66.1) 75.8(67.4, 82.6)65.0(56.1, 72.9) 57.6(44.9, 69.4)47.5(35.3, 60.0) HEMR8 49.3 (43.6, 55.1) 51.3 (44.3, 58.2) 45.1 (35.2, 55.3) 59.2(51.9, 66.1) 63.3(54.4, 71.4) 50.8(38.4, 63.2) Endoscopic Remission9 59.1(53.3, 64.6) 59.5(52.5, 66.1) 58.2(48.0, 67.8) 69.8(62.7, 76.1) 73.3(64.8, 80.4) 62.7(50.0, 73.9) HEMI10 50.3(44.6, 56.1) 51.8(44.8, 58.7) 47.3(37.3, 57.4) 59.8(52.5, 66.7) 64.2(55.3, 72.2) 50.8(38.4, 63.2) Bowel Urgency Remission11 51.6(45.8, 57.3) 55.4(48.4, 62.2) 42.9(33.2, 53.1) 52.5(45.2, 59.7) 60.0(51.1, 68.3) 37.3(26.1, 50.0) Bowel Urgency CMI12 n=266 13 65.4(59.5, 70.9) n=180 13 69.4(62.4, 75.7) n=87 13 56.3(45.9, 66.3) n=169 13 63.9(56.4, 70.8) n=112 13 68.8(59.7, 76.6) n=57 13 54.4(41.6, 66.6) Abbreviations: AE=Adverse event; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate transaminase; CI=Confidence Interval; CMI= clinically meaningful improvement; CSF= corticosteroid-free; HEMI= histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement; HEMR=histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission ES=Endoscopic Subscore; mITT=Modified Intent-to-Treat; mRNI=modified NRI; NRI=Nonresponder Imputation; NRS = Numeric Rating Scale; OC = observed case; TBL=total bilirubin.Definitions: Biologic Failed: Inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerant to a biologic therapy or the Janus kinase inhibitors for UC. Cerebrocardiovascular events: atrial fibrillation (N=2), angina unstable (N=1), coronary arterial stent insertion (N=1), hypertensive crisis (N=1), ventricular tachycardia (N=1) – angina and stint were same patient. Not Biologic Failed: failed conventional treatments (i.e., immunomodulators/corticosteroids); may include some participants who were exposed to but did not fail biologic treatment. Malignancy: thyroid cancer metastatic (N=1). mNRI: patients who discontinue treatment treated as nonresponders and patients who are otherwise missing endpoint data imputed using multiple imputation. NRI: patients who discontinue treatment treated as nonresponders and patients who are otherwise missing endpoint data tagged as nonresponders. OC: patients who discontinue treatment or are otherwise missing data are excluded from analyses. Opportunistic infection: herpes zoster (N=4), candidiasis (N=3) – one patient had each.1Responders = (≥30% and 2-point decrease from baseline in the composite clinical endpoint of the sum of endoscopic (ES), stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB) subscores, and RB = 0 or 1, or ≥1 pt decrease from baseline).2Remitters = (Mayo Modified Score [MMS] SF = 0 or SF = 1 with ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline; RB = 0; ES = 0 or 1) cohort of LUCENT-2 at W52.3Response confidence intervals are constructed using Wilson method, without continuity correction.4Clinical response: ≥2-point and ≥30% decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0 or 1 or, RB ≥1-point decrease from baseline.5Clinical remission: SF=0 or SF=1 with ≥1-point decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0; and ES=0 or 1 (excluding friability).6Symptomatic remission: SF=0 or SF=1 with ≥1-point decrease in MMS from baseline; RB=0.7Corticosteroid-free (CSF) remission: Defined as clinical remission, and no corticosteroid use for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 52; SF = 0, or SF = 1 with a ≥1-point decrease from induction baseline; RB = 0; ES = 0 or 1 (excluding friability).8Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission (HEMR): Endoscopic subscore=0 or 1 (excluding friability) + Geboes≤2.0.9Endoscopic remission: ES=0 or 1 (excluding friability); score ranges 0 to 4; a lower score indicates less mucosal damage.10Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI): Endoscopic subscore=0 or 1 (excluding friability) + Geboes≤3.1.11Bowel urgency remission: UNRS=0 or 1.12Bowel urgency Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI): Change from baseline in UNRS≥3 in patients with UNRS≥3 at induction baseline.13In patients who had BU NRS≥3 at induction baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207