MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404103178 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.29.24316289

Safety and efficacy of long-term gantenerumab treatment in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease: an open label extension of the phase 2/3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled platform DIAN-TU Trial

2024· preprint· en· W4404103178 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Randall J. Bateman, Yan Li, Eric McDade, Jorge J. Llibre‐Guerra, David B. Clifford, Alireza Atri, Susan L. Mills, Anna Santacruz, Guoqiao Wang, Charlene Supnet, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Brian A. Gordon, Laura Ibáñez, Gregory Klein, Monika Baudler, Rachelle S. Doody, Paul Delmar, Geoffrey A. Kerchner, Tobias Bittner, Jakub Wojtowicz, Azad Bonni, Paulo Fontoura, Carsten Hofmann, Luka Kulic, Jason Hassenstab, Andrew J. Aschenbrenner, Richard J. Perrin, Carlos Cruchaga, Alan E. Renton, Chengjie Xiong, Alison Goate, John C. Morris, David M. Holtzman, B. Joy Snider, Catherine J. Mummery, William S. Brooks, David Wallon, Sarah Berman, Erik D. Roberson, Colin L. Masters, Douglas Galasko, Suman Jayadev, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle, Jérémie Pariente, Justin Kinsella, Christopher H. van Dyck, Serge Gauthier, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Mario Masellis, Bruno Dubois, Lawrence S. Honig, Clifford R. Jack, Alisha Daniels, Ricardo Allegri, Jasmeer P. Chhatwal, Gregory S. Day, Nick C. Fox, Edward D. Huey, Takeshi Ikeuchi, Mathias Jucker, Jae‐Hong Lee, Allan I. Levey, Johannes Levin, Francisco Lopera, Jee Hoon Roh, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Peter R. Schofield

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesNational Health and Medical Research CouncilGenentechNational Institutes of HealthFondation pour la Recherche sur AlzheimerDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenBayer VitalFondation Brain CanadaNeuroscience Research AustraliaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchParkinson CanadaWeston Brain InstituteJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyAlzheimer SocietyTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesNovo NordiskEisaiAlzheimer's Association
Mots-clésDementiaAmyloid (mycology)DiseaseMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseTerm (time)Amyloid βGerontologyNeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Amyloid-plaque removal by monoclonal antibody therapies slows clinical progression in symptomatic Alzheimer's disease; however, the potential for delaying the onset of clinical symptoms in asymptomatic people is unknown. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU) is an ongoing platform trial assessing the safety and efficacy of multiple investigational products in participants with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) caused by mutations. On the basis of findings of amyloid removal and downstream biological effects from the gantenerumab arm of the platform trial, we continued a 3-year open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with high doses of gantenerumab. Methods: The randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2/3 multi-arm trial (DIAN-TU-001) assessed solanezumab or gantenerumab versus placebo in participants who were between 15 years before to 10 years after their estimated years to symptom onset and had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score of 0 (cognitively normal) to 1 (mild dementia). This study was followed by an OLE study of gantenerumab treatment, conducted at 18 study sites in Australia, Canada, France, Ireland, Puerto Rico, Spain, the UK, and USA. For inclusion in the OLE, participants at risk for DIAD had participated in the double-blind period of DIAN-TU-001 and were required to know their mutation status. We investigated increasing doses of gantenerumab up to 1500 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks. Due to the lack of a regulatory path for gantenerumab, the study was stopped early after a pre-specified interim analysis (when most participants had completed 2 years of treatment) of the clinical measure CDR-SB. The primary outcome for the final analysis was the amyloid plaque measure PiB-PET SUVR at 3 years, assessed in the modified intention to treat population (defined as participants who received any gantenerumab treatment post-OLE baseline, had at least one PiB-PET SUVR assessment prior to gantenerumab treatment, and a post-baseline assessment). All participants who received at least one dose of study drug in the OLE were included in the safety analysis. DIAN-TU-001 (NCT01760005) and the OLE (NCT06424236) are registered with clinicaltrials.gov. Findings: Of 74 participants who were recruited into the OLE study between June 3, 2020 and April 22, 2021, 73 were enrolled and received gantenerumab treatment. 47 (64%) stopped dosing due to early termination of the study by the sponsor, and 13 (18%) prematurely discontinued the study for other reasons. The mITT population for the primary analysis comprised 55 participants. At the interim analysis, the hazard ratio for clinical decline of CDR-SB in asymptomatic mutation carriers was 0.79 (n=53, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.32) for participants who were treated with gantenerumab in either the double-blind or OLE period (Any Gant), and 0.53 (n=22, 0.27 to 1.03) for participants who were treated with gantenerumab the longest (Longest Gant). At the final analysis, the adjusted mean change from OLE baseline to year 3 in PiB-PET SUVR was -0.71 SUVR (95% CI -0.88 to -0.53, p<0.0001). Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities occurred in 53% (39/73) of participants: 47% (34/73) with microhaemorrhages, 30% (22/73) with oedema, and 6% (5/73) were associated with symptoms. No treatment-associated macrohaemorrhages or deaths occurred. Interpretation: Partial or short-term amyloid removal did not show significant clinical effects. However, long-term full amyloid removal potentially delayed symptom onset and dementia progression. Conclusions are limited due to the OLE design and use of external controls and need to be confirmed in long term trials. Funding: National Institutes on Aging, Alzheimer's Association, GHR, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd/Genentech.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,110
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2024
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxiv→Même sujetAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→Travaux en français237 207→