Abstract 4144554: Revascularization of Patients with Low-Density Non-Calcified Plaque was Associated with Lower Occurrence of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a powerful noninvasive tool for identifying high-risk plaque, such as low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP). Though, the optimal treatment of patients with LD-NCP remains unclear. This study explored the association of revascularization in the setting of LD-NCP with the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the ICONIC study. A subset of 234 patients that underwent CCTA with subsequent ACS were matched to 234 control patients who also underwent CCTA but did not have ACS during follow-up. Patients were also followed for occurrence of revascularization, either coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention. Atherosclerosis imaging-enabled quantitative CT (AI-QCT) was used to measure diameter stenosis, and LD-NCP, non-calcified plaque, and calcified plaque volumes from each CCTA. LD-NCP was defined as plaque with -190 to 30 Hounsfield Units. Patients were stratified based on the presence of LD-NCP. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the occurrence of ACS with the rate of revascularization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and extended Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect size of revascularization and LD-NCP on occurrence of ACS. Results: AI-QCT was completed in 448/468 subjects (follow-up time [MEAN±SD] 2.44±2.48 years). The median of LD-NCP was 1.2 mm 3 for patients with >0 mm 3 LD-NCP. There were 85 patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 and 363 patients with LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 . In patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 , the rate of revascularization in patients with and without ACS was 3/52 (5.8%) versus 14/33 (42.4%) (p<0.001). In patients with LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 , the rate of revascularization in patients with and without ACS was 36/170 (21.2%) versus 39/193 (20.2%) (p=0.897). In comparison to patients without revascularization and LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 , patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 and revascularization were less likely to have ACS during follow-up (adjusted HR: 0.20 [0.07, 0.61]; p=0.005). Additionally, patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 who did not undergo revascularization were more likely to have ACS (adjusted HR: 1.47 [1.03, 2.12]; p=0.036). Hazard ratios were adjusted for diameter stenosis, and non-calcified and calcified plaque volume. Time-dependent coefficients were included for diameter stenosis. Conclusion: Revascularization of patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 identified on CCTA with AI-QCT was associated with less risk for ACS.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».