Abstract 4144554: Revascularization of Patients with Low-Density Non-Calcified Plaque was Associated with Lower Occurrence of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a powerful noninvasive tool for identifying high-risk plaque, such as low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP). Though, the optimal treatment of patients with LD-NCP remains unclear. This study explored the association of revascularization in the setting of LD-NCP with the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the ICONIC study. A subset of 234 patients that underwent CCTA with subsequent ACS were matched to 234 control patients who also underwent CCTA but did not have ACS during follow-up. Patients were also followed for occurrence of revascularization, either coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention. Atherosclerosis imaging-enabled quantitative CT (AI-QCT) was used to measure diameter stenosis, and LD-NCP, non-calcified plaque, and calcified plaque volumes from each CCTA. LD-NCP was defined as plaque with -190 to 30 Hounsfield Units. Patients were stratified based on the presence of LD-NCP. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the occurrence of ACS with the rate of revascularization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and extended Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect size of revascularization and LD-NCP on occurrence of ACS. Results: AI-QCT was completed in 448/468 subjects (follow-up time [MEAN±SD] 2.44±2.48 years). The median of LD-NCP was 1.2 mm 3 for patients with >0 mm 3 LD-NCP. There were 85 patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 and 363 patients with LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 . In patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 , the rate of revascularization in patients with and without ACS was 3/52 (5.8%) versus 14/33 (42.4%) (p<0.001). In patients with LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 , the rate of revascularization in patients with and without ACS was 36/170 (21.2%) versus 39/193 (20.2%) (p=0.897). In comparison to patients without revascularization and LD-NCP ≤1.2 mm 3 , patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 and revascularization were less likely to have ACS during follow-up (adjusted HR: 0.20 [0.07, 0.61]; p=0.005). Additionally, patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 who did not undergo revascularization were more likely to have ACS (adjusted HR: 1.47 [1.03, 2.12]; p=0.036). Hazard ratios were adjusted for diameter stenosis, and non-calcified and calcified plaque volume. Time-dependent coefficients were included for diameter stenosis. Conclusion: Revascularization of patients with LD-NCP >1.2 mm 3 identified on CCTA with AI-QCT was associated with less risk for ACS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".