Real-Time Analytics and AI for Managing No-Show Appointments in Primary Health Care in the United Arab Emirates: Before-and-After Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Primary health care (PHC) services face operational challenges due to high patient volumes, leading to complex management needs. Patients access services through booked appointments and walk-in visits, with walk-in visits often facing longer waiting times. No-show appointments are significant contributors to inefficiency in PHC operations, which can lead to an estimated 3%-14% revenue loss, disrupt resource allocation, and negatively impact health care quality. Emirates Health Services (EHS) PHC centers handle over 140,000 visits monthly. Baseline data indicate a 21% no-show rate and an average patient wait time exceeding 16 minutes, necessitating an advanced scheduling and resource management system to enhance patient experiences and operational efficiency. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solution that was integrated with an interactive real-time data dashboard on reducing no-show appointments and improving patient waiting times at the EHS PHCs. Methods: This study introduced an innovative AI-based data application to enhance PHC efficiency. Leveraging our electronic health record system, we deployed an AI model with an 86% accuracy rate to predict no-shows by analyzing historical data and categorizing appointments based on no-show risk. The model was integrated with a real-time dashboard to monitor patient journeys and wait times. Clinic coordinators used the dashboard to proactively manage high-risk appointments and optimize resource allocation. The intervention was assessed through a before-and-after comparison of PHC appointment dynamics and wait times, analyzing data from 135,393 appointments (67,429 before implementation and 67,964 after implementation). Results: Implementation of the AI-powered no-show prediction model resulted in a significant 50.7% reduction in no-show rates (P<.001). The odds ratio for no-shows after implementation was 0.43 (95% CI 0.42-0.45; P<.001), indicating a 57% reduction in the likelihood of no-shows. Additionally, patient wait times decreased by an average of 5.7 minutes overall (P<.001), with some PHCs achieving up to a 50% reduction in wait times. Conclusions: This project demonstrates that integrating AI with a data analytics platform and an electronic health record systems can significantly improve operational efficiency and patient satisfaction in PHC settings. The AI model enabled daily assessments of wait times and allowed for real-time adjustments, such as reallocating patients to different clinicians, thus reducing wait times and optimizing resource use. These findings illustrate the transformative potential of AI and real-time data analytics in health care delivery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».