Real-Time Analytics and AI for Managing No-Show Appointments in Primary Health Care in the United Arab Emirates: Before-and-After Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Primary health care (PHC) services face operational challenges due to high patient volumes, leading to complex management needs. Patients access services through booked appointments and walk-in visits, with walk-in visits often facing longer waiting times. No-show appointments are significant contributors to inefficiency in PHC operations, which can lead to an estimated 3%-14% revenue loss, disrupt resource allocation, and negatively impact health care quality. Emirates Health Services (EHS) PHC centers handle over 140,000 visits monthly. Baseline data indicate a 21% no-show rate and an average patient wait time exceeding 16 minutes, necessitating an advanced scheduling and resource management system to enhance patient experiences and operational efficiency. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solution that was integrated with an interactive real-time data dashboard on reducing no-show appointments and improving patient waiting times at the EHS PHCs. Methods: This study introduced an innovative AI-based data application to enhance PHC efficiency. Leveraging our electronic health record system, we deployed an AI model with an 86% accuracy rate to predict no-shows by analyzing historical data and categorizing appointments based on no-show risk. The model was integrated with a real-time dashboard to monitor patient journeys and wait times. Clinic coordinators used the dashboard to proactively manage high-risk appointments and optimize resource allocation. The intervention was assessed through a before-and-after comparison of PHC appointment dynamics and wait times, analyzing data from 135,393 appointments (67,429 before implementation and 67,964 after implementation). Results: Implementation of the AI-powered no-show prediction model resulted in a significant 50.7% reduction in no-show rates (P<.001). The odds ratio for no-shows after implementation was 0.43 (95% CI 0.42-0.45; P<.001), indicating a 57% reduction in the likelihood of no-shows. Additionally, patient wait times decreased by an average of 5.7 minutes overall (P<.001), with some PHCs achieving up to a 50% reduction in wait times. Conclusions: This project demonstrates that integrating AI with a data analytics platform and an electronic health record systems can significantly improve operational efficiency and patient satisfaction in PHC settings. The AI model enabled daily assessments of wait times and allowed for real-time adjustments, such as reallocating patients to different clinicians, thus reducing wait times and optimizing resource use. These findings illustrate the transformative potential of AI and real-time data analytics in health care delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".