Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Managing soil phosphorus (P) in agroecosystems with high P levels is crucial to mitigate P loss in water sources without compromising yields. The objective of this study was to assess maize silage ( Zea mays L.) + interseeding cover crop of annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiforum ) or using a relay cover crop and starter P (P0, P10, and P20) on (i) P leaching, (ii) changes in soil P status, and (iii) maize yield, cover crop biomass and P uptake. A six-year study was conducted between 2018 and 2023 in two sites. Leachate samples were collected every two weeks between 2021and 2023. The concentration of P in leachate exceeded 0.5 mg L –1 indicating a high risk of P leaching at the current levels of soil P. High concentration of P in leachate with a peak at 0.9 mg L –1 in August and 1.45 mg L –1 in October during 2021 and 2022 was pronounced under interseeded compared to relay cover crop system due to improve water infiltration contributing to the downward movement of P. In contrast, the concentration of P in leachate was high under relay cover crops in February and March particularly in 2023, which could be attributed to the delay in cover crops establishment and growth in early spring. The concentration of P extracted using anion exchange membranes (PO 4AEMs ) increased with increasing starter P rate during the first weeks after planting maize silage. There were spikes of PO 4AEMs , reaching 1.18 and 1.73 µg cm –2 d –1 during the 4th, 7th, and 8th weeks after planting maize which coincided with high soil moisture content occurring after irrigation or rainfall events. The lack of dry matter yield response to starter P at harvest was due to high initial soil P. The soil P status remained significantly high averaging 196.6 mg kg –1 as Mehlich-3 P, despite negative cumulative P budgets. A close observation of the relationships among soil P indicators shows a trend of rapidly decreasing water extractable P under interseeding compared with relay cover crops. It is possible that the production of high biomass under interseeding cover crops increased the amount of P taken up from the soil. We conclude that interseeding cover crops within cash crops in high P soils could be effective at decreasing soil P, but could enhance P leached in the first years of cropping due to high water infiltration along the soil profile. • P leached was assessed in high-P soils in maize-interseeding cover crop systems. • P in leachate > 0.5 mg L –1 across cropping systems and sampling periods. • Maize dry matter yield was not affected by P fertilizer due to high initial soil P. • Soil P remained high at 196.6 mg kg –1 after six years despite negative P budgets. • High risk of P leached at the levels of soil P in the study sites.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».