MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404431921 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109381

Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system

2024· article· en· W4404431921 on OpenAlexaff
Aimé J. Messiga, Thidarat Rupngam

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover cropEnvironmental scienceLeaching (pedology)AgronomySilageSoil waterPhosphorusAgroforestrySoil scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managing soil phosphorus (P) in agroecosystems with high P levels is crucial to mitigate P loss in water sources without compromising yields. The objective of this study was to assess maize silage ( Zea mays L.) + interseeding cover crop of annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiforum ) or using a relay cover crop and starter P (P0, P10, and P20) on (i) P leaching, (ii) changes in soil P status, and (iii) maize yield, cover crop biomass and P uptake. A six-year study was conducted between 2018 and 2023 in two sites. Leachate samples were collected every two weeks between 2021and 2023. The concentration of P in leachate exceeded 0.5 mg L –1 indicating a high risk of P leaching at the current levels of soil P. High concentration of P in leachate with a peak at 0.9 mg L –1 in August and 1.45 mg L –1 in October during 2021 and 2022 was pronounced under interseeded compared to relay cover crop system due to improve water infiltration contributing to the downward movement of P. In contrast, the concentration of P in leachate was high under relay cover crops in February and March particularly in 2023, which could be attributed to the delay in cover crops establishment and growth in early spring. The concentration of P extracted using anion exchange membranes (PO 4AEMs ) increased with increasing starter P rate during the first weeks after planting maize silage. There were spikes of PO 4AEMs , reaching 1.18 and 1.73 µg cm –2 d –1 during the 4th, 7th, and 8th weeks after planting maize which coincided with high soil moisture content occurring after irrigation or rainfall events. The lack of dry matter yield response to starter P at harvest was due to high initial soil P. The soil P status remained significantly high averaging 196.6 mg kg –1 as Mehlich-3 P, despite negative cumulative P budgets. A close observation of the relationships among soil P indicators shows a trend of rapidly decreasing water extractable P under interseeding compared with relay cover crops. It is possible that the production of high biomass under interseeding cover crops increased the amount of P taken up from the soil. We conclude that interseeding cover crops within cash crops in high P soils could be effective at decreasing soil P, but could enhance P leached in the first years of cropping due to high water infiltration along the soil profile. • P leached was assessed in high-P soils in maize-interseeding cover crop systems. • P in leachate > 0.5 mg L –1 across cropping systems and sampling periods. • Maize dry matter yield was not affected by P fertilizer due to high initial soil P. • Soil P remained high at 196.6 mg kg –1 after six years despite negative P budgets. • High risk of P leached at the levels of soil P in the study sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207