MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404681197 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-955

The Classical and Large-a Solar System  

2025· preprint· en· W4404681197 sur OpenAlexaff
Wesley C. Fraser, Samantha Lawler, Rosemary E. Pike, J. J. Kavelaars, Edward Ashton, Stephen Gwyn, Ying-Tung Chen, Brett Gladman

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Établissements canadiensOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of ReginaNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSolar SystemAstrobiologyComputer sciencePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Here we present results of CLASSY: the Classical and Large-A Solar SYstem survey. Running into its third year, this 2-year CFHT Large Program was allotted 75 nights from 2022B through 2024A inclusive, with a 16 night extension in 2024B and 2025A to accommodate time lost due to equipment failure. Using shift’n’stack techniques, CLASSY has been surveying 5 independent pointings (10.1 square degrees total) of the cold classical belt’s forced midplane in search of Kuiper Belt Objects and very distant extreme trans-Neptunian Objects. Field opposition locations are chosen to be spaced as evenly as possible in ecliptic longitude and each spans a two-month window (AS: Aug-Sept, ON, JF, MJ, JA). The survey design involves 5 visits to each field across the first year (discovery), with observations of these fields at a second opposition one year later for some fields, and 2 years later for others (tracking). The survey has achieved limiting magnitudes of r~26.5, and we expect to have an >80% recovery rate during tracking. Due to the nature of the observations which by design are drifted at rates that approximate typical main-belt Kuiper Belt Objects, highly distant and/or inclined objects tend to sheer off the tracking pointings, resulting in a reduced recovery rate for objects on those orbits. To compensate, a pointed recovery effort at Magellan and supplemented at Palomar has accompanied the main CFHT program, successfully recovering many of our discoveries on more extreme orbits. To date, all discovery fields have been acquired, and all fields have received a complete year 2 or year 3 follow-up, thereby completing the main CLASSY observing program. The main science goals of CLASSY are to measure the size distribution of the cold classical belt to absolute magnitudes as faint as H_r~10, and to provide a census of extreme TNOs with minimal and well measured bias in ecliptic longitude. By nature of the robust pre/recovery during the first year, free inclinations can be calculated with sufficient accuracy to provide a surprisingly robust separation between members of the cold classicals and the more excited TNO populations, thereby enabling robust measurements of the luminosity functions of each population separately. We find that both populations exhibit the same luminosity functions to within the precision of the observations. Our observations reveal that the cold classical Kuiper Belt Objects exhibit an absolute magnitude distribution that is somewhat shallower than a direct extrapolation of the tapered exponential that accurately describes the size distribution measured for larger and brighter objects (see Figure 1). The inferred differential power-law slope over the range of CLASSY discoveries q~-2.5, revealing a decreasing mass per size, and suggests that what ever formation process resulted in these objects, it preferentially resulted in objects with diameters D~150 km, where the size distribution rolls over to this shallower slope. Even though our analysis clearly demonstrates sensitivity to objects at distances as far as 200 au, CLASSY has found a surprising dearth of eTNOs, discovering no more than 1 in the three fields we have searched to date (AS, ON, JF) though at time of writing, the year 2 and 3 follow-up observations have not been included in our analysis resulting in large uncertainties in orbital semi-major axis. At the distances over which most eTNOs are found, CLASSY is sensitive to objects with sizes smaller than the roll-over size of objects in the more proximate main Kuiper Belt, D~150 km. This preliminary result implies that eTNOs either exhibit a different size distribution and thus, possess relatively fewer large bodies than the main belt, or that these objects have subdued albedos compared with main belt objects, or both. We will conclude with a discussion of these and other prospects that can address the observed paucity of eTNOs. Figure 1: The preliminary absolute magnitude distribution of the cold classicals derived from the observations of AS (blue) and JF (orange) blocks. The thin black outline marks the cold classical Kuiper Belt Object H-distribution presented by Kavelaars et al. (2021) and the thick grey curve displays the best-fit tapered exponential of the cold classicals presented by Napier et al. (2024). ReferencesKavelaars et al. (2021) OSSOS Finds an Exponential Cutoff in the Size Distribution of the Cold Classical Kuiper Belt ApJ, 920L, 28KNapier et al. (2024) The DECam Ecliptic Exploration Project (DEEP). V. The Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Cold Classical Kuiper Belt, PSJ Vol 5, 270N.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,949
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,476

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsTravaux en français237 207