Attribution of old russian furniture in museums in the first quarter of the twentieth-first century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Attribution of Old Russian furniture in museums begins in the first third of the twentieth century, and its active development continues in the next century. In 2000, a catalog for the exhibition “One Hundred and Twelve Chairs” was published. For the first time, it includes images of several ancient artifacts and their brief annotations. The next edition on the topic of interest to us was published in St. Petersburg in 2003. Its Old Russian section includes a selective bibliography and two articles in which information about furniture production from antiquity to the XVII centuries is presented in chronological order on the basis of information gleaned from literature, as well as specific monuments for the consideration of stage phenomena. In 2015, a book about the collection of furniture of the Hermitage appeared. The catalog part includes several ancient artifacts previously published in the second half of the twentieth century, without a radical revision of the old information. An example of the practical use of the method of complex research of the monument is the 2017 article by N.V. Ugleva about a retractable table. A detailed study of the monument made it possible to determine that it, like its direct analogues, were made not in the XVII– XVIII, as previously thought, but at the end of the XIX century. In 2018, a book was published dedicated to Russian painted chests, which includes furniture of the XVI–XVII centuries. The author analyzes its design and decor, suggests a new dating. In the same year, a collective monograph was published, about the phenomenon of domestic throne chairs. Two articles directly concern the topic of interest to us. In the first of them, “For Fear and Greatness”, the question of terminology is solved, the historical evolution of this type of ceremonial setting for official receptions in Russia has been traced since ancient times. The second article about Russian throne chairs [24]. For the first time, these monuments are considered as examples of stylistic art. The same algorithm of practical work with museum exhibits is reflected in the published report by N.V. Ugleva on the new attribution of the curule chair from the collection of the Historical Museum. Previously considered a model of the XVII century. On the basis of an art history analysis, it was ranked among the works of the last third of the XV – first third of the XVI centuries. The only foreign author who published Russian artifacts of the XVII century is D. Miller, who included two monuments from the Hermitage collection. In the XXI century, the development of the science of ancient Russian furniture has risen to a new stage, when doubts were expressed about the relevance of old dating and the idea of separating the ancient heritage into a separate zone of independent research is being viewed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».