MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405039028 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-206247

Final Results of the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Trial of Cybord Induction, Double-Alkylator Conditioning with High-Dose Intravenous Busulfan + Melphalan, ASCT and Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (CMRG-001)

2024· article· en· W4405039028 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Donna Reece, Giovanni Piza Rodriguez, Mariela Pantoja, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Darrell White, Irwindeep Sandhu, Julie Stakiw, Michaël Sébag, Terrance Comeau, Kevin Song, Jean Roy, Martha Louzada, Arleigh McCurdy, Vishal Kukreti, Suzanne Trudel, Anca Prica, Rodger E. Tiedemann, Christine I. Chen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensLondon Health Sciences CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreVancouver General HospitalBC Cancer AgencySaint John Regional HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontConcordia UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity Health NetworkDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMelphalanMedicineBusulfanLenalidomideMultiple myelomaMaintenance therapyPlerixaforSurgeryOncologyInternal medicineChemotherapyCyclophosphamide

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Real-world CMRG Database results in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with the previous Canadian standard regimen of CyBorD induction, high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel) + single ASCT followed by lenalidomide (len) maintenance until progression/toxicity yielded a benchmark median PFS of 4.5 and median OS of 9.4 years (yrs) (Cote J, et al. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:137). The CMRG-001 trial was designed over a decade ago to try to optimize results in ASCT-eligible NDMM patients (pts). Study pts received the same standard induction in use during this time (typically weekly CyBorD) as well as len maintenance 10 mg daily until disease progression/toxicity, but the pre-ASCT conditioning consisted of double-alkylator HD therapy with intravenous (IV) busulfan and melphalan (BuMel) rather than HD-Mel (Reece D, et al. Blood 2019; 134 [Suppl 1]: 4570). Results: Between 03/2013-05/2016, 78 pts were entered. Median age was 57 yrs (range 34-69); 51 (65.4%) were male; median beta-2 microglobulin level was 3.07 mg/L (range 1.7-20). High-risk (HR) FISH cytogenetics were identified in 15 (19.2%) pts and consisted of t(4;14) in 9 (11.5%), t(14;16) in 7 (9%) and del17p in 4 (5%); 5 pts had 2 HR features. Median follow-up is now 7.2 yrs (range 0.4-8.9). The PFS rates at 5 and 8 yrs after ASCT are 60% (95% CI 48-70%) and 43% (95% CI 30-56%), respectively. The median PFS for those with standard-risk (SR) FISH has not yet been reached compared with 4 yrs for HR pts. In SR pts, the 5-yr PFS is 66% (95% CI 52-76%) and 8-yr PFS 50.2% (95% CI 35-64%), compared with the respective PFS rates in HR individuals of 32% (95% CI 10-57%) and 11% (7-37%) (p=0.008). No difference in PFS between HR pts with 1 versus 2 HR FISH aberrations was observed (p=0.41), although pt numbers were small. No early transplant-related mortality occurred. Twenty-three events of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) have been diagnosed in 20 pts (including 1 pt with both colon and 3 non-melanoma skin cancers) as follows: skin cancers in 8 (1 melanoma and 7 non-melanoma [all resolved]), 7 heme malignancies (4 AML, 1 ALL, 1 Hodgkin's disease, 1 diffuse large B cell lymphoma) and 8 adenocarcinomas (1 prostate, 1 endocervical in situ, 2 colon, 1 lung, 1 pancreas, 2 unknown primary). Median time from ASCT until diagnosis of any SPM was 2.76 yrs, and 3.71 yrs in those with invasive/systemic SPMs; 5 of these pts had already discontinued len maintenance for other reasons. Nineteen (24.4%) of the 78 pts have died. The most common cause of death was MM progression (9 pts) while 7 pts succumbed to an SPM (2 from AML, 1 from ALL, 1 from Hodgkin's disease and 3 from adenocarcinoma). The median time from ASCT to death from SPM was 4.2 yrs. The other 3 deaths were due to pulmonary embolism in 1 pt and unknown causes in 2 pts. The median OS in all pts has not yet been reached. The 5- and 8-yr OS rates are 81% (95% CI 70-88%) and 71.5% (95% CI 59-81%). When evaluated by FISH cytogenetic risk, 5- and 8-yr OS rates are 85% (95% CI 73-90%) and 76% (95% CI 61-85%) for SR pts and 63% (95% CI 32-83%) and 54% (95% CI 24-76%) in HR pts, respectively (p=0.043). Summary/Conclusions: 1) Despite the caveats with cross-trial comparisons, the median PFS of 7.4 yrs and 5- and 8-yr OS rates of 81% and 71.5% with IV BuMel conditioning before ASCT compare favorably with our prior real-world Canadian benchmarks using similar CyBorD induction and len maintenance until progression but pre-ASCT conditioning with HD-Mel alone without Bu; 2) the results are not dissimilar to those reported with RVD induction, single ASCT using HD-Mel conditioning, RVD consolidation and continuous len maintenance (median PFS 5.6 yrs and 5-yr OS 79.2%; Richardson PG, et al. NEJM 2022; 387:132); 3) while just over half of the SR pts are alive without progression 8 yrs post-ASCT, the PFS and OS in HR pts remain suboptimal; 4) better preventative strategies are needed to reduce the incidence of fatal SPMs; 4) the PFS/OS survival results suggest a strong anti-myeloma effect of IV BuMel conditioning before ASCT, particularly given the absence of RVD before/after ASCT in this trial; 5) future ASCT studies evaluating IV BuMel conditioning with optimal induction, integration of immunotherapy and/or modified len maintenance schedules–perhaps based on factors such as MRD status–may be of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,995
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,124

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→