Combination of Olutasidenib and Azacitidine Induces Durable Complete Remissions in m<i>IDH1</i> Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicohort Open-Label Phase 1/2 Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a significant challenge as standard chemotherapies have limited efficacy and may be contraindicated in elderly or frail patients. Relapse and resistance to current therapies are common outcomes, and both quality and length of life decrease with successive lines of therapy. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine (AZA), are frequently used for both newly diagnosed and R/R AML, but have limited single-agent responses. Olutasidenib (OLU) is a potent, selective, oral, small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1 (mIDH1) and is FDA-approved for treatment of patients with mIDH1 R/R AML. A phase 1/2 registrational trial demonstrated that OLU monotherapy induced complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) in 35% of patients with R/R mIDH1 AML for a median duration of 25.9 months. We present a pooled analysis of patients with R/R AML who received a combination of OLU and AZA from the registrational, phase 1/2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02719574). Methods: Adult patients with R/R mIDH1R132 AML received twice daily 150 mg OLU (in continuous 28-day cycles) plus standard-of-care AZA (daily for 7 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles) and were evaluated for safety and response. Results: Sixty-seven patients with R/R mIDH1R132 AML received combination OLU+AZA after a median 10.2 months since AML diagnosis; 43% were refractory and 57% relapsed to prior treatment. Median age was 66 years (range 28-82), and 54% were male. Baseline ECOG was 0-1 in 82%. Most (83%) patients had 2+ prior treatment regimens, including HMA in 40%, IDH1 inhibitor therapy in 31% (olutasidenib monotherapy in 24%), and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in 10%. Cytogenetic risk class was intermediate in 72%, poor in 18% and unknown in 10%. One to 3 co-mutations were identified in 58% of patients, 4-7 in 19%, with FLT3 in 19% and TP53 in 6%. CR/CRh was achieved in 21/67 (31%; 95% CI, 21-44) patients, and median duration of CR/CRh was 15 months (range 0.4-49). The median time to CR/CRh was 3 months (range 1-10). CR was achieved in 18/67 (27%; 95% CI, 17-39) patients with median duration of 20 months (range 0-44). Overall response (partial remission or better) was achieved in 34/67 (51%; 95% CI, 38-63) patients. In a subset analysis (N=51) excluding patients who had prior OLU exposure, CR/CRh was achieved in 19/51 (37%; 95% CI, 24-52) patients, and CR was achieved in 16/51 (31%; 95% CI, 19-46). Overall response was achieved in 30/51 (59%; 95% CI, 44-72). Duration of CR/CRh was identical for the subset of 51 patients to the full group of 67 patients. The median overall survival was 13 months (95% CI, 9-19) in 67 patients, 24 months in overall responders, 30.6 months in patients with CR/CRh, and not reached (range 11.5, 55.3+) in patients with CR. Twelve patients (18%) who achieved remission went on to receive HSCT. Among the full group (N=67), transfusion independence of red blood cells (RBC) and platelets was achieved in 29% and 33% of patients, respectively, who were dependent at baseline. In patients who achieved CR/CRh (n=21), transfusion independence (RBC and platelets) was achieved in 64% (7/11) and 57% (4/7) of patients, respectively, who were dependent at baseline. The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (≥20% patients) were decreased platelet count (37%), red blood cell count (25%), and neutrophil count (24%). Six patients (9%) experienced differentiation syndrome, of which 2 (3%) were grade 3. Grade 3 or 4 Increases in ALT were reported in 1 patient, AST in 1, ALP in 1, and transaminases in 1. Four patients (6%) discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Conclusion: In the first reported analysis of a combination therapy with an mIDH1 inhibitor and an HMA focused on the relapsed/refractory AML setting, olutasidenib plus azacitidine induced high response rates and durable remissions with a tolerable side effect profile in patients with R/R mIDH1 AML.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».