Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban for Pediatric Patients Requiring Anticoagulation for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: In children, the incidence of VTE was initially reported to be very low at 0.07-0.14 per 10,000 children; however, contemporary data revealed a higher incidence for hospitalized children: ≥ 106 per 10,000 admissions (Andrew M et al. Blood 1994;83:1251-7, van Ommen CH et al. J Pediatr 2001;139:676-81, O'Brien SH et al. Pediatrics 2022;149:e2021054649). Pediatric evidence-based VTE treatment guidelines recommend unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as standard of care (SOC), acknowledging the gap surrounding the use of direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, in children (Monagle P et al. Chest 2012;141[suppl 2]:e737S-e801S, Monagle P et al. Blood Adv 2018;2:3292-3316). The safety and efficacy profile of apixaban in adults with VTE has been established (Agnelli G et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:699-708 and 2013;369:799-808). This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of apixaban in pediatric patients (pts) requiring anticoagulation for the treatment of VTE. Methods: In this 12-week, open-label, active-controlled descriptive study (NCT02464969), pediatric pts (aged < 18 years) with image-confirmed VTE were randomized 2:1 to receive apixaban dosed according to a fixed-dose, body weight tiered (mg/kg) regimen by age group (birth to 27 days, 28 days to < 2 years, 2 to < 12 years, 12 to < 18 years), or SOC prescribed per local practice (VKA, LMWH, and UFH). The primary efficacy endpoint was image-confirmed and adjudicated recurrent VTE defined as contiguous progression or non-contiguous new thrombus (new), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), other thrombosis, paradoxical embolism, and VTE-related mortality. The primary safety endpoint was adjudicated major bleeding and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Secondary endpoints included new or recurrent symptomatic/asymptomatic DVT, PE, VTE other than DVT or PE, stroke, index event status, minor bleeding events, and apixaban PK/PD (plasma concentration and anti-Factor Xa activity [AXA] of apixaban). Pts who discontinued anticoagulation completed end-of-treatment and safety visits. The study was not powered and used descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 229 pts were randomized (full analysis set: apixaban n = 155, SOC n = 74). In total, 26 pts (11.4%) discontinued treatment (apixaban n = 17, SOC n = 9) and 4 (1.7%) were not treated (apixaban n = 3, SOC n = 1). The majority of pts were female (55.9%) and White (76.4%); median (range) age was 14.2 (0.04-18.0) years. Baseline demographics were comparable between treatment arms. Primary efficacy endpoint: in the apixaban group, 4 (2.6%, 95% CI 0.8-6.7) pts had ≥ 1 symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrent VTE event compared with 2 (2.7%, 95% CI 0.2-9.9) pts in the SOC group; no pts had VTE-related death. Primary safety endpoint: no pts in either treatment group had major bleeding events. In the apixaban group, 2 (1.3%, 95% CI 0.1-5.0) pts had CRNMB compared with 1 (1.4%, 95% CI 0.0-8.1) in the SOC group. The overall safety profile of apixaban was similar to SOC based on the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. No clinically meaningful treatment differences in hematology and clinical chemistry laboratory parameters were observed. Day 14 pre-dose and corresponding post-dose median apixaban concentrations were similar across age groups at the administered doses. AXA was linearly correlated to apixaban concentrations across all age groups and body-weight tiers. Conclusions: In this active-controlled descriptive study in children from birth to < 18 years of age with acute VTE, treatment with apixaban resulted in a low risk of VTE recurrence and comparable risk of major and CRNMB events compared to SOC therapy. No new safety signals were observed in apixaban-treated pts. The safety profile was generally consistent with that reported in adult VTE studies. PK/PD findings demonstrated linear correlation and were consistent across age and body-weight tiers. Study support: This study was sponsored by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Acknowledgments: We thank the Study B0661037 investigators and patients for their participation. Editorial and medical writing support were provided by Caudex, a division of IPG Health Medical Communications, New York, NY, USA, and were funded by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».